3D Printed Guns Make Gun Control Debate Obsolete

8

Technology has unleashed upon us, a world where fantasy has become reality. Anything can go from your mind to reality, with the push of a button. So is the case of 3D printing and firearms.

When Cody Wilson first got the idea to 3D print a gun, I don’t think he realized the far reaching implications of his idea nor that a simple idea could throw the entire gun debate out the window. Defense Distributed a “Nonprofit Anti-Monopolist Digital Publishing” company, founded by Cody, on the belief that people should be able to freely share and print gun part designs to make at home using the best of today’s technology, the 3D printer.

3D-printed-gun-models

Cody and his company were the first to 3D print an AR-15 lower receiver. After many designs and failed test shots at the range, they achieved it. Cody was able to 3D print a fully usable and firing lower receiver and high capacity magazines. It was a first in the world.

Just a few short years later, Defense Distributed finds themselves in a law suit with the U.S. State Department. Cody filed suit against the U.S. Government for constitutional censorship violations. The suit claims that the State Department has censored his distribution of “information in the form of blueprints, drawings, photographs, plans, instructions or documentation,” as per the 2015 filing. According to Cody, the State Department is not allowing for his distribution of specific manufacturing info related to 3D printing gun parts at home, a violation of his constitutional rights. He attests that the digital distribution of gun specs and blueprints are not covered under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, which the State Department is using as their excuse to ban his disbursement of 3D printable gun part blueprints. The law suit is ongoing.

Cody has taken his innovation in a new direction with the release of the Ghost Gunner. An easy to use home milling device that can etch a gun out of a block of metal. Well, more accurately, it can produce gun parts like the lower assembly of an AR-15. The Ghost Gunner has come under fire, as it is able to manufacture highly regulated parts with out a serial number, making them completely untraceable. The Ghost Gunner can be bought for around $1200, putting the capability of making an untraceable weapon in the hands of anyone with a PC, and the money to shell out for the device.

That brings up a whole new debate. If you are able to manufacture banned, hard to get or untraceable guns, the entire existing gun debate becomes irrelevant. Who cares about background checks when you can make your AR at home?

s2-100595226-primary.idge

Everyone should have seen this coming. Where there is a will, there is a way. The future of 3D printed guns is uncertain, but the conversation is only just beginning. I’m pretty sure that like all other digital information, once its out there, its out there and cannot be turned back. While politicians go around in circles with the current gun debate in the U.S., innovators like Cody Wilson will be there to show the folly in their ways.

Sources: CNet, Ghost Gunner, Defense Distributed, Wired.


This article (3D Printed Guns Make Gun Control Debate Obsolete) is a free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author Alek Hidell and AnonHQ.com.


Anonymous recommends: Click Here To Surf & Download Anonymously, Protect Yourself From Any Hackers Or Spy Agencies And Get Around Censorship Filters

Click here to follow us on steemit.com, the decentralized social media platform with no censorship and get paid for your posts, likes and comments!

 

8 COMMENTS

  1. This is truly terrifying. With this technology Australia and other civilized countries could end up like the United States

    • Other civilized countreies yes, but Australia?

      If Australians wanted to kill each other US-style, couldn’t they just go outside and choose from the vast bounty of lethal stuff nature provides the good people down under?

      Jokes aside, I get your point and I agree, coming from Denmark where firearms are highly controled, and only legal for civiliains if they have a hunters permit, or do sports shooting, and even then, only specific types are allowed (no assault rifle hunting etc.) and sports pistols/rifles have to be kept at the shooting range i think.

      Been wondering about the legality of printing and selling custom parts for airsoft rifles since i first heard of 3d printed guns

  2. This is truely awesome, I can’t wait to get my hands on one of these. Think of all the guns, guns and more guns i can make. Gonna need a bigger house.

  3. god dammit people, guns don’t kill people, people do, the problem is not the guns, its the people using them, again I say the problem is not the technology it Is the person using it. someone with a milling machine could make their own gun parts, so what’s the difference. the fact of the matter is, if someone wants a gun in todays day and age, they will get one, whether it be legal or illegal is also irrelevant in todays society. we all know legal doesn’t mean right, and illegal doesn’t mean wrong.

  4. Ok, not to panic. Plastic lowers for ARs have been around for a few years and totally legal. Lowers are just one portion of what makes an functional AR-15. The barrel, recoil spring, slide etc. etc. MUST be made out of refined metal.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here