Biggest Election Fraud In History Discovered In The United States

15

By Jon Rappoport

 

Shocking video reveals secret software designed to rig elections.

Vote fraud expert Bev Harris exposes electronic voting machines.

Okay. She finally did it. On Monday, Bev Harris (blackboxvoting.org), the great investigator of vote fraud, appeared on the Alex Jones show and laid it all out. The GEMS vote-fraud system, “fraction magic,” the way the vote is being stolen. Not just in theory, but in fact. Listen to the whole interview and get the word out. Bev’s findings are staggering. Below the video is the original piece I did on this earlier this month.

High Alert: the election can still be rigged

Votes counted as fractions instead of as whole numbers

…[A]mazingly, the vote-rigging system it describes has not gotten widespread attention. The system can be used across the entire US.

As we know, there are a number of ways to rig an election. Bev Harris, at blackboxvoting.org, is exploring a specific “cheat sheet” that has vast implications for the Trump vs. Hillary contest.

It’s a vote-counting system called GEMS.

I urge you to dive into her multi-part series, Fraction Magic (Part-1 here). Here are key Harris quotes. They’re all shockers:

“Our testing [of GEMS] shows that one vote can be counted 25 times, another only one one-thousandth of a time, effectively converting some votes to zero.”

“This report summarizes the results of our review of the GEMS election management system, which counts approximately 25 percent of all votes in the United States. The results of this study demonstrate that a fractional vote feature is embedded in each GEMS application which can be used to invisibly, yet radically, alter election outcomes by pre-setting desired vote percentages to redistribute votes. This tampering is not visible to election observers, even if they are standing in the room and watching the computer. Use of the decimalized vote feature is unlikely to be detected by auditing or canvass procedures, and can be applied across large jurisdictions in less than 60 seconds.”

“GEMS vote-counting systems are and have been operated under five trade names: Global Election Systems, Diebold Election Systems, Premier Election Systems, Dominion Voting Systems, and Election Systems & Software, in addition to a number of private regional subcontractors. At the time of this writing, this system is used statewide in Alaska, Connecticut, Georgia, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Utah and Vermont, and for counties in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming. It is also used in Canada.”

“Instead of ‘1’ the vote is allowed to be 1/2, or 1+7/8, or any other value that is not a whole number.”

“Weighting a race [through the use of GEMS] removes the principle of ‘one person-one vote’ to allow some votes to be counted as less than one or more than one. Regardless of what the real votes are, candidates can receive a set percentage of votes. Results can be controlled. For example, Candidate A can be assigned 44% of the votes, Candidate B 51%, and Candidate C the rest.”

“All evidence that [rigged] fractional values ever existed [in the GEMS system] can be removed instantly even from the underlying database using a setting in the GEMS data tables, in which case even instructing GEMS to show the [rigged] decimals will fail to reveal they were used.”

“Source code: Instructions to treat votes as decimal values instead of whole numbers [i.e., rigging] are inserted multiple times in the GEMS source code itself; thus, this feature cannot have been created by accident.”

A contact who, so far, apparently wishes to remain anonymous states the following about the history of the GEMS system:

“The Fractional vote [rigging] portion traces directly to Jeffrey W. Dean, whose wife was primary stockholder of the company that developed GEMS. He ran the company but was prohibited from handling money or checks due to a criminal conviction for computer fraud, for which he spent 4 years in prison. Almost immediately after being released from prison he was granted intimate access to elections data and large government contracts for ballot printing and ballot processing.”

I see no effort on the part of the federal government, state governments, or the mainstream press to investigate the GEMS system or respond to Bev Harris’ extensive analysis.

It’s not as if media outlets are unaware of her. From shesource.org, here is an excerpt from her bio:

“Harris has been referred to as ‘the godmother’ of the election reform movement. (Boston Globe). Vanity Fair magazine credits her with founding the movement to reform electronic voting. Time Magazine calls her book, Black Box Voting, ‘the bible’ of electronic voting… Harris’s investigations have led some to call her the ‘Erin Brockovich of elections.’ (Salon.com)… Harris has supervised five ‘hack demonstrations’ in the field, using real voting machines. These have been covered by the Associated Press, the Washington Post, and in formal reports by the United States General Accounting Office…”

So far, her analysis of GEMS seems to be labeled “too hot to handle.” Press outlets prefer to report the slinging of mud from both Presidential candidates’ camps. Meanwhile, the actual results of the coming elections—including Congressional races—appear to be up for grabs, depending on who controls GEMS.

Update: From what I understand, each state government appoints a “consultant” to manage GEMS on election night. That person would be capable of rigging the vote.

This article originally appeared on activistpost.com.

15 COMMENTS

  1. We here in Australia taking voting as something straight forward and have faith in our system.
    It’s all open and transparent. Check it all out at http://www.aec.gov.au
    And any Australian citizen is eligible to vote (except if you’re in prison with a long sentence). Never any obstruction to voting. Yes it is compulsory, and we get at least 90% turnout. Democracy the way it’s meant to be.

  2. when you vote. The votes are transferred to a paper log. Votes also stay in the machine memory. Other is on a removable drive. I would think. If any fraud accrues from the removable drive or the box memory. Selected official from both parties can count the votes on the paper log. Those are whole votes. I would presume, they all need to match.

  3. This Is Bologna. SUCH FUCKING CRAP. This is absolute Bullshit. Those machines are different in every state. I highly doubt there is a master Key to change Votes. As a Programmer i know what she is talking about, Integer Versus Double or floating point, but her story does not hold any water.

  4. Ok so where will this go from here? Will it just be left on a shelf full of dust and history?

    Someone needs to take this and run with it. America depends on it.

  5. My worry is that Trump and the GOP are trying to steal the election by a combination of wide-spread systematic voter suppression (id laws enforced only in black and hispanic communities), intimidation (poll ‘watcher’ to harass minority voters) and misinformation (pro-Trump 4chan members targeting Clinton users with false information about how to vote). Trump reminds me far to much of Hitler, and we need to stop him before he can target us in a second holocaust. I’m no fan of Hillary either, but she is far less dangerous than Trump. However, I think her campaign is far too weak to stop Trump by itself. Traditional forms of activism are failing, we need to act now to stop him. We might not get a second chance once he establishes his secret police.

    • … how can you read information from wikileaks, which has NEVER released a piece of false information, and then continue to say hillary would be better for this country than trump? If hillary gets elected wikileaks is dropping information to get her put in prison without a doubt. Then the corrupt people running this government can put who ever they want behind Kaine to do what ever they so please. With trump elected it would be much harder to place whom ever they want behind him to get what they want. Trump is by far not the best candidate, maybe he is there to be the exact same thing hillary is; however, its clear hillary shouldnt be anywhere near a presidential seat.

    • ID laws keep the vote honest not repressed. People should be required to show ID it wasn’t long ago, and probably still happening, that corporations would hire pools of people to hit every voting station that doesn’t ID this allowed people to get more than one vote on a given day. How you say requiring an ID is repressive to the vote is beyond my comprehension, given in most cases all you need is mail to prove your idenity.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here