Obama’s Birth Certificate Investigation Concludes After 5 Years, Forensic Outcome: Certificate is Fake

After a 5 year long investigation, forensic evidence has concluded that President Obama's birth certificate presented to the public is without a doubt, 100 percent fake.

10
Obama birth certificate fake

This isn’t about whether Barack Obama’s country of birth was the United States or somewhere else. This is about whether or not the birth certificate put forth by the government and Obama was indeed fraudulent.

Over the course of a 5 year investigation overseen by Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and conducted by Mike Zullo, involving PhD graduates in 4 different labs, and other professionals, the birth certificate put forward by the government at the time, has been declared a fake.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio held a news conference on the 16th, aired live on Fox 10 to discuss his department’s findings. You can view the entire segment below.

9 points of forgery were discovered; copied and pasted onto Barack Obama’s birth certificate from a birth certificate belonging to a Johanna Ah’ Nee. Both certificates came from Hawaii, 1961, just 16 days apart. The 9 points forged from the certificate belonging to Ah’Nee were pasted “digitally” onto the Obama document.

The 9 points of forgery include [mark 13:12]:

Section 6a Place of Birth, the city — Honolulu

Section 6b Place of Birth, the island — Oahu

Section 7b “Residence of Mother” — Oahu

Date stamp of document in Section 20 and 22

Section 6c – box crossed ‘yes‘ to “Is Place of Birth Inside City or Town Limits?”

Section 7d – box crossed ‘yes‘ to “Is Residence Inside City or Town Limits?”

Section 7g box crossed ‘no’ to “Is residence on a farm or plantation?”

The boxes in 6d and 7c where the cross marked ‘yes’ to the questions were also forged.

Obama birth certificate fake

Two specialists from two different continents (Hawaii and Italy) with no knowledge of the other, assisted in the investigation, and both concluded very similar outcomes, resulting in the 9 points of forgery.

The date stamps  [mark 27:27 on the clip below] at the lower angle at the bottom of the documents suggest that it is highly probable that the document is a forgery. Coupled with the other points discovered, suggests that it is 100 percent a forgery because of the “textual juxta-positioning” relationship of certain words to each other on the document.

Reid Hayes, co-author of 5 books, a board member of the scientific association of forensic examiners, and a court qualified hand writing and document examiner with 40 years’ experience, released this conclusion. “The Obama certificate of live birth posted on whitehouse.gov on April 27, 2011 is a fraudulently manufactured document. Evidence indicates that this certificate of live birth of Johanna Ah’ Nee is one source utilized in the construction of the certificate of live birth … “the nail in the coffin” that provides the certificate of live birth is inauthentic…” In other words, it is a fraudulent document.

The intention was to clear the document, says self-confessed Republican, Zullo. But it wasn’t to eventuate if he were to remain true to his discipline as an investigative officer, after evidence began to mount. 

Stonewalled by two places that could have cleared the issue up, Zullo was as much as thrown out by Kapalani medical centre as he was from the Department of Health in Hawaii, both avoiding the question of genuine verification of the contents of the birth certificate, not that there was simply a birth record on file. [mark 35:00 and 39:45].

Zullo was also clear that Johanna Ah’ Nee is not a suspect; her birth certificate, according to her, had remained in a locked filing cabinet until 10 days after the Obama certificate surfaced online. [mark 40:05]

Falsifying a document like this is a federal offense. It is also speculated that the birth certificate was simply created – which can be done on face value, according to Hawaiian laws. All in all, the document is false, but the context and circumstances are still unknown. It disappeared and reappeared from the bound documents it belonged in, to the White House and back again. Zullo has more questions than answers – but the document is now proven by specialists in their field, on either side of the world, as fake.

Ironically, revisiting the laws of Hawaii, Zullo points out “Hawaii law says that the Department of Health in Hawaii must create a birth certificate merely on the representation from anyone that a birth has taken place. It doesn’t tell you anything. Somebody just reported it.” [mark 39:00]

There are ways to amend a certificate years later [mark 37.25], where the amended information becomes the real information in the file. And that there is no way to determine if it is an amended certificate.

It begs the question as to why this certificate was ever amended – or if it was created entirely. It is a federal offense. The Johanna Ah’ Nee document is a source of the activity – it’s a “safe bet.” Technically, Obama should be impeached.

What is Obama, to this day – and the government – hiding?

It also begs the question: why hasn’t this news gone viral?

.

Sources: Private sources, YouTube.


This article (Obama’s Birth Certificate Investigation Concludes After 5 Years, Forensic Outcome: Certificate is Fake) is a free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author AnonWatcher and AnonHQ.com.


Supporting Anonymous’ Independent & Investigative News is important to us. Please, follow us on Twitter: Follow @AnonymousNewsHQ  

10 COMMENTS

  1. I always suspected by Obama’s accent that he was a Russian spy. Thank god Fighten’ Joe Arpaio has got our back. Seriously, a friend of mine who has studied the matter has a convincing argument that Obama’s mom was a CIA whore. Check it for yourselves.

    • Did you perhaps believe Sheriff Joe???? (If so, so sorry.)

      His “9 points” was disproved within five hours after the press conference.

      http://imgur.com/gallery/qB8NG

      At his last press conference before this one Sheriff Joe claimed that he had proved that Obama’s birth certificate was forged because of the penciled numeral ‘9″ besides one of the entries.

      Sheriff Joe claimed that the numeral “9” meant that the box was not filled in, and since the box was indeed filled in, that must mean that the birth certificate is forged. And then it turned out that Sheriff Joe got the meaning of “9” from a coding book FOR THE WRONG YEAR.

      And of course you will remember his sending a team to Hawaii to see whether there was an original birth certificate in the files of the DOH—-and neglecting to tell that team that A WARRANT would be necessary.

      Then there was the claim that “layers” proved that Obama’s birth certificate must be forged. But in fact layers are normal in PDF, and you can scan your own birth certificate—or any document on security paper, compress the result, put it into PDF and then open that file with Adobe Illustrator and SEE LAYERS. (And if you don’t believe me, you can try that out for yourself with your own birth certificate.

      I don’t believe that Sheriff Joe mentioned the “African American” myth, but other birthers have been concentrating on that a lot lately, and as usual they are WRONG. (The explanation is that in Hawaii you are allowed to use ANY word or combination of words to describe your race, and the word on Obama’s birth certificate is actually AFRICAN and not African American”—-and the word AFRICAN was what AFRICAN exchange students commonly called their race at the time, and Obama’s father was an AFRICAN exchange student. And the hospital, Kapiolani, really did exist in 1961 and really did have exactly the same name as on Obama’s birth certificate (birther “research” being wrong as usual and for the standard motive), and if you don’t believe me call the hospital up during office hours Hawaii time, and ASK.

      In short the “Obama’s birth certificate is forged” claim comes from the same motive that caused the “African American” myth and the “hospital had a different name” myth and the “his Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya” LIE (she actually said that Obama was born in Hawaii in three interviews, of which birthers showed their readers only part of one, carefully cutting off the tape recording on their sites just BEFORE she was asked where he was born and replied that it was in Hawaii “where his father was studying at the time.” And they did not show the other two interviews at all (Now, I wonder why not?), and in one of them she said that the first that he family had heard of Obama was IN A LETTER FROM HAWAII, and in the other she simply said that Obama was not born in Kenya—-which, BTW. the Kenyan government has said too (Birther sites did not show that to their readers either, for the usual motive).

  2. If you are too ignorant to understand the basic principals of copy & paste, and don’t have the intellectual capacity to fathom what the implications of a president without a true certificate of live birth mean, then don’t bother leaving a comment. Go back to the sandbox. Play with your Tonkas. Eat dirt, and relish the fact that ignorance truly IS bliss. You like your news and current events processed, pureed, and packaged in a neat little box, with a golden M for a handle. Much easier for your little tum-tum to digest your information that way, isn’t it? Awwww… Him’s such a BIG THINKER!
    Meanwhile, The Acting President Of The United States Of America, Barack Obama, does not have one of the very elements that are required to become president. You MUST be born in the U.S.A. and must be able to PROVE that. That’s why Arnold Schwarzenegger can NEVER run for president. You MUST be a naturally born citizen to even be considered a candidate. Obama’s birth certificate is a fake. A fabricated document, which is a federal offense in and if itself. So that said, what does that say about his entire PRESIDENCY? Fruit of the forbidden tree. School is over. Go back to recess, kids.

  3. Can someone explain what’s up with anonymous? Last year they were all about fake communist agenda news. This year they are truthful and conservative righteous. It is a positive change. But who can explain this to me and how can they ever be trusted with their previous history?

  4. Anyone with any knowledge of photoshop can tell you the file they published is totally fake. It has nine layers. Snopes tries to explain it as coming from a scanner, which simply a lie – scanners don’t divide images into layers. So Snopes is confirming that the file published has nine layers. It does not take any research to know that means the file is a forgery. All it takes is basic knowledge of computers, scanners, and photoshop. Obviously the person who published the file didn’t know acrobat supports layers, assuming that saving the file as a PDF (from photoshop) would flatten the image. That is a mistakes lots of people would make. It’s also a bad forgery, which is why it’s so trivial to verify.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here