Renowned Climate Scientist Fears the CIA Could Use the Weather as a War Weapon

9

Written by Derrick Broze at theantimedia.org

 

While speaking at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in San Jose, California, Professor Alan Robock discussed the possibility that the Central Intelligence Agency is using the weather as a weapon of war. Robock has done research for the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC) in the past.

Robock stated he was phoned by two men claiming to be from the CIA, asking whether or not it was possible for hostile governments to use GeoEngineering, or mass manipulation of the weather, against the United States.

“I got a phone call from two men who said we work as consultants for the CIA and we’d like to know if some other country was controlling our climate, would we know about it?”
[…]
“I’d learned of lots of other things the CIA had done that haven’t followed the rules and I thought that wasn’t how I wanted my tax money spent. I think this research has to be in the open and international so there isn’t any question of it being used for hostile purposes.“

The news comes days after an international committee of scientists released a report stating that GeoEngineering techniques are not a viable alternative to reducing greenhouse gas emissions to combat the effects of climate change. The committee report called for further research and understanding of various GeoEngineering techniques, including carbon dioxide removal schemes, and solar-radiation management, before implementation. The scientists found that Solar Radiation Management or albedo-modification techniques are likely to present “serious known and possible unknown environmental, social, and political risks, including the possibility of being deployed unilaterally.”

Robock noted that, “The CIA was a major funder of the National Academies report so that makes me really worried who is going to be in control.”  The National Academy of Sciences report examined the effects and possibility of geoengineering to combat climate change. The report was also funded by NASA, the US Department of Energy, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Professor Rodock’s fears are not completely unfounded. In a 1996 document entitled “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather by 2025”  the U.S. Air Force discusses a number of proposals for using the weather as a weapon. The Environmental Modification Treaty was signed by the United States and other nations to halt global weather modification.

But the government did not simply research these ideas, they actually implemented them. During the Vietnam War the US government operated covert weather modification programs under Operation Popeye. The government does not only experiment with technology in foreign countries, they like to try it at home as well. In 2012 it was revealed that the US Army sprayed toxic chemicals over the skies of St. Louis without informing the public.

The controversy around GeoEngineering grows as an increasing number of people believe GeoEngineering programs are already active. This is what is derogatorily called the “Chemtrails Conspiracy”. Beyond just simple ignorance of the masses it is highly imperative you do research on the dangers of geoengineering and consider the possibility that the US (and other nations) may already be participating in live geoengineering schemes without informing the public or the global community. Whether to combat climate change, or use as a weapon, altering the weather will have disastrous ramifications.

Background on GeoEngineering

Geo-engineering is the science of manipulating the climate for the stated purpose of fighting man-made climate change. These include Solar Radiation Management (SRM), the practice of spraying aerosols into the sky in an attempt to deflect the Sun’s rays and combat climate change.

According to a recent congressional report:

“The term “geoengineering” describes this array of technologies that aim, through large-scale and deliberate modifications of the Earth’s energy balance, to reduce temperatures and counteract anthropogenic climate change. Most of these technologies are at the conceptual and research stages, and their effectiveness at reducing global temperatures has yet to be proven. Moreover, very few studies have been published that document the cost, environmental effects, socio-political impacts, and legal implications of geoengineering. If geoengineering technologies were to be deployed, they are expected to have the potential to cause significant transboundary effects.

In general, geoengineering technologies are categorized as either a carbon dioxide removal (CDR) method or a solar radiation management (SRM) method. CDR methods address the warming effects of greenhouse gases by removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. CDR methods include ocean fertilization, and carbon capture and sequestration. SRM methods address climate change by increasing the reflectivity of the Earth’s atmosphere or surface.

Aerosol injection and space-based reflectors are examples of SRM methods. SRM methods do not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, but can be deployed faster with relatively immediate global cooling results compared to CDR methods.”

One of the many dangers of manipulating the weather is the loss of blue skies. According to a report by the New Scientist, Ben Kravitz of the Carnegie Institution for Science has shown that releasing sulphate aerosols high in the atmosphere would scatter sunlight into the atmosphere. He says this could decrease the amount of sunlight that hits the ground by 20% and make the sky appear more hazy.

Although a number of authorities have warned about the dangers of geoengineering techniques, the risks are seen as secondary to the perceived risks of climate change. The interesting thing to note is that although proponents of geoengineering hail it as the solution to climate change and sustaining life, studies show that geoengineering could actually have the reverse effect of heating the Earth.

According to a recent study published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, if geoengineering programs were started and then suddenly halted the planet could see an immediate rise in temperatures, particularly over land. The study, titled “The impact of abrupt suspension of solar radiation management”, seems to indicate that once you begin geoengineering you cannot suspend the programs without causing the very problem you were seeking to resolve.

CLICK HERE TO SUPPORT US VIA PATREON

Get Your Anonymous T-Shirt / Sweatshirt / Hoodie / Tanktop, Smartphone or Tablet Cover or Mug In Our Spreadshirt Shop! Click Here

 

9 COMMENTS

  1. Here is a letter you can send to your politicians. Just change the name and country:

    1 / 2
    To Whom it May Concern,
    My name is Joe Letto. I am deeply concerned about the ongoing climate engineering programs that are taking place in our skies today. Our once beautiful blue sky has turned into a sky of aerosol trails that linger, spread, and form a milky white haze. Many days begin with the sun attempting to greet us. Unfortunately, on these days we do not receive the necessary direct sunlight that we used to take for granted, and now crave. You typically see, the now familiar planes striping our skies turning them into a murky souplike appearance. Not only have our precious skies been turned to a toxic ugly mess, but our air is also now unsafe to breathe.
    Countless certified lab tests have proven our air, water, soil, and snow to be contaminated with aluminum, barium, and strontium. These substances are listed in government held weather modification patents, US3630950, US3813875, and US RE29142E. Spraying these toxic metal nano particulates into our skies is reckless, dangerous, and criminal. Furthermore, these particulates do not remain suspended in the sky. The substances fall to Earth, for us and our ecosystems to absorb. See documents below for more information.
    You are our officials, whose job and oaths clearly state that it is your responsibility to represent the people, yet you are keeping quiet. Were you fooled into believing that these programs could work? It is true that clouds reflect sunlight back into space. However, those same artificial clouds trap heat on Earth’s surface, where it would escape at night. The spraying is not helping!
    It has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt what is occurring here. Scientists, whistleblowers, pilots, and meteorologists have come forward to provide testimony and data, stating that Solar Radiation Management (SRM) is occurring and ongoing. For any person, especially a representative of the people who has been given data, to say that these aerosol trails are solely water vapor with a little engine residue is highly negligent. It is also aiding and implying your consent for these programs.This letter is being sent to remind you of your duty and oath to protect and serve the citizens of Canada. The people see what is occurring here and we demand representation of our concerns.
    We are sick of being stonewalled by our elected representatives/officials and the media. Previous responses to constituent’s letters of concern, answering, “ It is water vapor” are not sufficient. We have video footage of the spraying; we have lab tests confirming contamination of the same substances that are in the government held climate engineering patents. By ignoring this mountain of evidence you are implicating yourself in and aiding these programs. Once full awareness has been reached, which is rapidly increasing, those involved in the chemical spraying of the people will likely be charged with crimes against humanity.
    Now is the time for you to decide who you will represent. The Canadian government, which has proven time and time again that it solely cares for its own agenda; or the Canadian people, who are being forced to breathe in this chemical laced air and are asking for your help. We need your assistance in bringing back our sunlight and blue sky. Please advise me of your intentions to create public disclosure of the chemical spraying hazards. Also, what steps are you going to take to help our Earth and leave an environment we can be proud of for our grandchildren? Kindly respond by no later than March 1, 2015, or I will assume that you have no intention of responding.

    2 / 2
    Sincerely,
    Joe Letto

    Geoengineering Websites:

    http://www.geoengineeringwatch.com
    http://www.endgeoengineering.com/index.html

    Weather Modification Patents:

    http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/an-extensive-list-of-patents/

    Neurosurgeon explains about climate engineering fallouts and its effects on mind and body:

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=X3lW-TGGlk0

    The Shasta County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to research testing for nano particles from geoengineering programs:

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gnkWR-MaoCk

    Rosalind Peterson’s address to United Nations concerning ongoing climate engineering experiments:

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LVD9IUO9Ftk

    Military Paper: Owning The Weather By 2025

    http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf

  2. because republicans will believe that someone is controlling the weather before they’ll believe man caused global warming. oh wait.

  3. Well has anyone seen the new 100$ bill conspiracy theory. Its probably gonna be right just like 9/11 and people will only remise after it happens.

  4. This sounds a lot like the conspiracy theory on the new 100$ bill. Probably gonna be like 9/11 when the theory turned out to be true. 🙁

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here