US Sends Navy To Disputed Islands, As China Warns That Its “military will stand up and use force to stop it”

11

 

 

The US government has apparently decided to risk both of its arms, the first by bear mauling and the second via fiery dragon’s breath as it has decided to poke BOTH Russia and China at the same time.

With a year-long campaign of bombing/supplying ISIS on one side and the decision to send in the navy to bump into islands that China is in the midst of reclaiming on the other, the US govt might just be biting off more than it can chew- or more accurately, it seems to be hoping that it would cause Russia and China a severe bout of diarrhea.

The region surrounding the Spratly Islands (or Spat-ly Islands, hehe) have been a hotbed for controversy, with the US and its allies in the region refusing to recognize China’s claims.

This comes a month after Obama had a pleasant conversation with Xi Jinping, apparently about the disputed area:

“I conveyed to President Xi our significant concerns over land reclamation, construction and the militarization of disputed areas, which makes it harder for countries in the region to resolve disagreements peacefully,” Obama said.
“I indicated that the United States will continue to sail, fly and operate anywhere that international law allows,” Obama added.
“Islands in the South China Sea since ancient times are China’s territory,” Xi resolutely stated.

Clearly the talks weren’t very effective, as the US has decided that a show of military force would solve their problems. As usual. Forget speaking softly and carrying a big stick; speak loudly and wave the good ole stick around several times for good measure seems to be the go-to response… sans actual bombing, at this point anyway.

Though Chinese officials have claimed that the reclamation of the islands served civilian purposes, it is likely that China hopes to extend its military’s reach in the only unclaimed/disputed area bordering its coast, and to do that they have built:

port facilities, military buildings and an airstrip on the islands, and recent imagery shows evidence of two more airstrips under construction. The installations bolster China’s foothold in the Spratly Islands, a disputed scattering of reefs and islands in the South China Sea more than 500 miles from the Chinese mainland.

Although the islands are as yet still too small to support large naval/ air force units, they allow the Chinese to embed a persistent force with which to monitor… and even defend the area until support arrives from the mainland.

Admiral Scott Swift has declared that China is not following international law:

“It’s my sense that some nations view freedom of the seas as up for grabs, as something that can be taken down and redefined by domestic law or by reinterpreting international law,” Swift said, according to a report by Reuters.
“Some nations continue to impose superfluous warnings and restrictions on freedom of the seas in their exclusive economic zones and claim territorial water rights that are inconsistent with (the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea). This trend is particularly egregious in contested waters.”

Other sources seem to indicate that the US is keen on showing China who is top dog in the area:

“I think it’s clear that there is not a good set of options for convincing, or even compelling, China not to dredge and build artificial islands in the South China Sea,” said Scott Harold, deputy director at Rand Corp.’s Center for Asia Pacific Policy.

But operating ships and aircraft near the artificial outposts would underline Washington’s stance that it does not recognize China’s legal claims or its aggressive methods of asserting them, Harold said.

There’s a concern that if you don’t … stand up for your positions, the Chinese will take that as evidence that you are unwilling to defend what you have claimed as your principles,” he said.

While concerned about showing its allies in Asia that it is still a major player in the region, the navy has been keen on assuring everyone that the moves were not “provocative”:

“It should not come as a surprise to anybody that we will exercise freedom of navigation wherever international law allows,” John Richardson, the U.S. chief of naval operations, told reporters in Tokyo.

I don’t see how this can be interpreted as provocative.”

Unfortunately, the Chinese are unlikely to back down from their position:

“From this perspective, China absolutely must not permit the U.S. side’s warships and planes to behave unscrupulously near islands and reefs reclaimed by China and in skies overhead, and challenge China’s bottom line,” said the paper, which is published by the ruling Communist Party’s official People’s Daily

China mustn’t tolerate rampant US violations of China’s adjacent waters and the skies over those expanding islands,” the newspaper said, warning thatif the US encroaches on China’s core interests, the Chinese military will stand up and use force to stop it.”

It seems that the military industrial complex must be elated with the news; the Chinese have stated that they will not allow the  US navy to sail in the contested waters, and the navy is saying that they will do so because provoking China for the sake of provoking it is NOT a provocation.

Both sides have drawn a line in the sand.

Both lines intersect.

At least one nation sees the potential for horrific conflict when the immovable object meets the unstoppable force; Australia has openly stated that it will sit this one out, despite ideologically supporting the US’s position:

We wouldn’t participate in any surveillance or whatever other activities the United States might have talked about,” Australian Trade Minister Andrew Robb said on Thursday in an interview with Bloomberg. He was commenting on the Pentagon’s plan to test China’s resolve to protect the waters around its artificial islands.

On that issue, we’re not taking sides,” Robb added.

When Eagle and Dragon collide, the Kangaroo says “f*** me mate, I’m not stickin’ my neck into THAT s***storm”.

 

Sources: The Free Thought Project, Foreign Policy, Reuters, RT


This Article (US Sends Navy To Disputed Islands, As China Warns That Its “military will stand up and use force to stop it”) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author(CoNN) and AnonHQ.com.

CLICK HERE TO SUPPORT US VIA PATREON

Get Your Anonymous T-Shirt / Sweatshirt / Hoodie / Tanktop, Smartphone or Tablet Cover or Mug In Our Spreadshirt Shop! Click Here

 

11 COMMENTS

  1. Well, if I was the Chinese Chairman, I would say to the US, “OK – we go the the UN to resolve this dispute then, Oh while we are chatting, can we have our $4 trillion back please ?”

  2. you gotta be nuts to believe the US initially did this on purpose. china had clear warnings about international laws and the distance to the islands they’re claiming that are way too far off from their coastal lines. they were formally invited over and over again to discuss their actions but did not respond to each of those requested invitations for so many months. the US has been a world police ever since. china is doing what japan was doing during WW2. so don’t ever think the US initially had to do with anything that’s going on now. they’re just trying to keep the balance based on the decisions of hard-headed nations like china.

    • What the fuck has anything in the south China sea got to do with the U.S that’s right nothing whatsoever.I wonder how the U.S would like China encroaching the Hawaiian islands.The U.S is putting anti-missile batteries in every country on Russia’s borders if that’s not warmongering I don’t know what is.The U.S should fuck off back to the America’s & concentrate on paying some of the 17 trillion debt off

  3. There are too many people on the planet. Not enough space, fresh water etc. We have to reduce our population by slowing down on breeding. We don’t need wars. Problem is governments want activity to manage, either from birth or death. That makes them relevant This world’s crazy.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here