Home Blog Page 2172

A Personal Story of Injustice in Peru

12

Written by: Anabel

 

My name is Anabel, I was born in Panama but I also have the Peruvian nationality because of my father. I’ve lived in Peru for almost 20 years; I came back to Panama 5 years ago because of the decease of my father. Ever since I left the country I’ve been trying to make justice for my father, today I would like to tell you that justice doesn’t exist in Peru.

 

My story involves a judge that has been denounced 18 times, because of the trials irregularities where he has been the judge. One of those complaints belongs to my mother, she reported him to the local prosecutor, but the Peruvian Justice decided to do nothing, that way they wouldn’t have to deal with the consequences.I’ll try to make the story short, so I’ll try to tell you about the 10 year process in a few words.

 

My father decided to buy an apartment, it belonged to Ambassador Gustavo Otero Zapata, he named his father as representative for the sale of the apartment. My father and Mr. Otero made ​​a private contract; My father gave him a check sum for 80% of the value of the apartment (leaving a balance of $ 11,800). To pay the final amount, my father puts a condition to see the deed, to which Mr. Otero refuses and says that my father needs to pay everything to show it. My father refuses thinking that this is not right so Mr. Otero sued my father to dissolve the contract, he claimed that the check that my father gave him was not to pay for the apartment but was a business they were doing, which he was never able to prove so the judge rules in our favor.

 

On his second attempt, Mr. Otero sued my father, this time it was to “give amount of money” (translation of the legal terms).

 

We got Judge Armando Romero Roca for this trial. He decided to seize the property so it could be auctioned. Did I say that my dad never had the deed of the apartment?  So if he was not seizing my dad, then who? Well the judge let Mr. Otero to seize himself. We maintained possession of the property but were not in our name, so if you are being sued how can it be that the plaintiff seized himself?

 

  • He constructed a sentence which basically says (and I am not writing this wrong): “The Defendant must grant and sign to the Defendant the deed …” usually to make a deal it requires two people, but not in this trial.
  • This judge did not let my mom to be part of the trial, you’ll see when you are married you cannot sell a property if it belongs to the marriage.
  • He decided to convert a trial set as “obligation to give sum of money” into a multi-trial. Instead of saying who is right and who should pay, he decided he was going to try a new form of law, he converted “obligation to give sum of money” to “seizure” to “auction” to “eviction” and then “grant deed.” He mixed these individual proceedings into a single trial, where of course he was the judge.
  • The private agreement was not made by a notary. The judge ordered to the Notary Raggio Medina with a notarized copy of this document to make it notarized.

 

My father during those 11 years was sick; he was a terminal renal/kidney patient (the diagnosis made by the health authorities was provided to the judge and he decided to ignored it). When my father saw that his home was about to be lost because of these injustices his health dwindled greatly.

 

The apartment went to a ‘’public auction’’ (no one ever notified us).

  • Angela Marlene EscalanteCabrejos bought it (150 square meters apartment, view to the ocean, etc)..she said that she bought the apartment “in good faith and to live there.” The strange thing is that in the eviction she mentions Mr. Otero and that we didn’t paid him… I thought she bought the apartment “in good faith”? so suddenly she knew Mr. Otero ?; also “to live there?” the apartment that was recently sold to someone else.

 

  • Cabrejos wanted to register the apartment as hers however the property records authorities (SUNARP) did not let her because the trial was not over. They were also asking about the marital status of my dad, (he was married but my mom wasn’t allowed to participate in the process). The judge said that the trial was over (when it wasn’t) and that my father was single (again, not true).

 

My father was a kidney patient and was in full session of peritoneal dialysis (which I warned the police, court officer, etc) when they attempted to evict us. I was with my father alone in the apartment; I was 22, suffering from panick attacks. The judge sent a police contingent of more than 20 police armed with shields and helmets to get us both. These are the links to the video recording when police entered the apartment, taking the door down:

 

 

 

 

I’ve sent this letter to the Peruvian and Panamanian authorities and press, and guess what? Except for a newspaper in Peru (La Exitosa) and Anonymous, nobody wants to make it public.

I want everyone to know my story so we can expose the judicial system in Peru, the open secret about injustice. Someone might read this and say we have bigger problems in the world like terrorists, hate crimes, drug crimes, etc but all of them, including my story, belong in my opinion to the ‘’power crimes’’ they are committed to gain control and power, usually this is done by intimidation.

 

The judge decided to send a sick man and his family to live in the street, not caring about the most basic right which is the human right. He sent my father to the graveyard. My mom, brother and I were welcomed/lived in a church for 45 days until the day that we returned to Panama.

 

If you go to this link you will see the judge applying to be promoted to superior court, he mentions that his wife is a journalist and that he has children (lucky them, to be able to grow up with a father) also he is asked about their properties…as a personal opinion its great that his life turned out to be so productive that has enabled him to have many properties.

 

RigobertaMenchu once said ‘’In our culture, peace is not a synonym for war; it’s a quality of life. It’s the strongest inspiration for happiness among people. Unfortunately weapons, arms, racism, war, oppression of human beings turn peace into a synonym with war. The cause has turned out [to be]… social inequality. That inequality affects all levels of peoples’ rights and the environment.’’

 

The only thing I ask to the person reading this, is to share this story, let’s try to make our governments to care about their people always and not only when is election time. Ffor what I care they can keep the apartment, I just want to do justice for my father.

 

Sincerely,

 

Anabel Barrenechea Santamaria

 

 

 

 


 

Does Our Government Spy For Profit?

1

Written by: Tech Anon

 

Anyone who would entertain this thought would probably say “why not” or maybe “it doesn’t surprise me”. Since the renowned Edward Snowden took off and came forward all at the same time, the American people, along with a good part of the world, have had their eyes opened to all the circumstances that lurked in the back of your mind. Things that you never had enough interest in nor were even concerned to ask about.  Enter the NSA, HSA, CIA and all those other acronyms of justice.

Now, Corporate spying and espionage are not a new idea. People have been stealing from one another since the beginning of time for various reasons. The government, on the other hand, denies having any part or reason to be a part of corporate or industrial deceitfulness… period. Our illustrious leaders completely separate themselves from the likes of the Chinese individuals that hacked the NY Times in January of 2013, Google in 2009 and others rarely heard about. The Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper has gone so far to say “It is not a secret that the Intelligence Community collects information about economic and financial matters…. What we do not do, as we have said many times, is use our foreign intelligence capabilities to steal the trade secrets of foreign companies on behalf of—or give intelligence we collect to—U.S. companies to enhance their international competitiveness or increase their bottom line.”* Hmmmm… Says you? Or are you yet another puppet? defense-contributions-chart

Enter Edward Snowden…again. In a public interview broadcast in Germany in January of 2013** He stated; “The U.S. National Security Agency is involved in industrial espionage and will grab any intelligence it can get its hands on regardless of its value to national security.” While citing the Siemens Company as a target, Snowden also claims the NSA has secretly installed software in almost 100,000 computers around the world to enable them to carry out surveillance or even provide a routing to enable digital attacks. This program named Quantum*** was used since (at least) 2008 and is only a tidbit of a 52 BILLION dollar intelligence “Black budget”**** according to the infamous Snowden and the Washington Times.

Who decides whom to peek at? Why, The Attorney General, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence of course. Although I don’t think this is what President Regan had in mind when he signed E.O. 12333 in the 80’s. There is law to protect US citizens though. *cough cough* According to Cornell law, Section 702 of the U.S. code basically states that “an acquisition may not intentionally target any person known at the time of acquisition to be located in the United States”***** among other limitations.

Now, back to the original question and maybe some …reality? Does our government spy for profit or participate in technological espionage? The only ones that will ever really know are the ones making the money from it all. Who is to say that Edward Snowden didn’t take off with a pile of stolen technology to sell and that’s what pissed off the high and mightiest? Taking money out of a person’s pocket is the same as pulling food out of their mouth these days. James Clapper made his statements about not giving any information or trade secrets our government snatches to US companies. The first thought that pops up here is “oh, so they sell it to them?” Money makes the world go round. You want it, need it or have developed the skills to do without it. There’s no way to prove or disprove that any given “agent” of the government won’t skim or sell something that’s been acquired to pad their own pockets. It’s seen on TV and in movies constantly so, the idea has been there a long time. If media can think it up, there’s someone that’ll try to use it. robot-spy

All kidding aside, the mysticism of our government and how it’s been perverted into what it’s become is no joke. The information is out there to be found without puffery or ludicrous stroking. There need only be a desire to look for it and learn from it.  This corner of the world is filled with conspiracy theories, propaganda and even more government B*******. It’s in the mailbox, the inbox, the newspaper and the radio.  One final block added to the toddler’s wobbly skyscraper?

A recently leaked paper called the “Quadrennial intelligence Review, Final Report, 2009”******

The very last paragraph of the conclusion to this report states:

“(U) In conclusion, QICR 2009 highlights the urgency to begin developing new approaches to prepare for an uncertain future. Elements of the National Intelligence Program, foreign intelligence services, state, local and tribal governments and industry are encouraged to consider these insights in conducting their own long term  planning efforts. The rigor with which QICR 2009 developed these ideas to mitigate strategic and institutional risk must now be translated into meaningful agenda items for the IC and its partners to carry forward.”

Look around you. Learn everything you can and work together. We are Anonymous and We are strong. What do YOU think?

______________________________________________________________________________

Sources:

*https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/09/05/us-governments-plans-use-economic-espionage-benefit-american-corporations/

**http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/26/us-security-snowden-germany-idUSBREA0P0DE20140126

***http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/15/us/nsa-effort-pries-open-computers-not-connected-to-internet.html

https://firstlook.org/theintercept/document/2014/09/05/quadrennial-intelligence-review-final-report-2009/ (quadrennial intelligence review final report)

****http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/national/black-budget/?hpid=z5 ($52 billion “black budget)

*****http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1881a (section 702, US CODE- Procedures for targeting certain persons outside the United States other than United States persons)

******https://firstlook.org/theintercept/document/2014/09/05/quadrennial-intelligence-review-final-report-2009/

Yahoo ‘threatened’ by NSA With $250,000-a-day fine For Refusing Surveillance

19

Written by: Tiobe

 

Yahoo! Inc. will release to the public more than 1,500 pages of previously classified documents from a 2007-2008 court case in which Yahoo attempted to refuse the National Security Agency (NSA) request for Yahoo user data, announced Yahoo General Counsel Ron Bell Thursday, Sept. 11 via the Yahoo Tumblr page.

“In 2007, the U.S. Government amended a key law to demand user information from online services. We refused to comply with what we viewed as unconstitutional and overbroad surveillance and challenged the U.S. Government’s authority,” said Bell. “Our challenge, and a later appeal in the case, did not succeed. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) … ordered us to give the U.S. Government the user data it sought in the matter.”

According to the Federal Judicial Center, Congress established FISC in 1978, authorizing the Chief Justice of the United States to select seven federal district court judges who would review warrant applications pertaining to “national security investigations,” with three of these same judges serving as FISC-R, a panel for appeals. The U.S. Patriot Act of 2001 expanded FISC from seven to 11 judges, and FISC-R first convened the following year. Current FISC-R members include U.S. Circuit Judge William Bryson, Second Circuit Judge Jose Cabranes and Ninth Circuit Judge Richard Tallman.

That government-appointed panel’s proceedings have no directive toward public disclosure, and Yahoo’s efforts to make its court documents available to the public tackled an uphill battle. The Internet giant persisted however, in its staunch belief that its users – and the general public – had a right to be apprised of Yahoo’s efforts to challenge government surveillance and data demands. Yahoo-building

“The FISC and the FISC-R (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review) are ‘secret’ courts that oversee requests by the U.S. Government for surveillance orders and other types of legal process in national security investigations,” continued Bell. “The Court’s hearings and records are closed to the public and typically classified. For example, our role in the 2007-2008 lawsuit remained classified until 2013. In spite of this, we fought to declassify and to share the findings from the case.

“A decision to open FISC or FISC-R records to the public is extremely rare. Now that the FISC-R has agreed to unseal the proceedings at our request, we are working to make these documents available,” Bell said. “We consider this an important win for transparency, and hope that these records help promote informed discussion about the relationship between privacy, due process, and intelligence gathering.”

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) responded to Bell’s comments Thursday, claiming the NSA and intelligence community acted in the interest of national security, and that both FISC and FISC-R rulings found the NSA’s request in compliance with legal exceptions to the Fourth Amendment.

“Today, following a renewed declassification review, the Executive Branch is publicly releasing various documents from this litigation, including legal briefs and additional sections of the 2008 FISC-R opinion, with appropriate redactions to protect national security information,” states the ODNI press release. “The directives issued to Yahoo under the PAA (Protect America Act of 2007) required it to assist the U.S. Government in acquiring foreign intelligence information through the surveillance of targets reasonably believed to be located outside the United States. Yahoo refused to comply with the directives, and the U.S. Government initiated proceedings in the FISC to compel compliance. Yahoo opposed the U.S. Government’s motion to compel compliance with the directives primarily on the ground that the directives violated the Fourth Amendment rights of its customers. On April 25, 2008, following extensive briefing by the parties, the FISC held that the directives were lawful and ordered Yahoo to comply.”

The debate surrounding NSA data collection is ongoing. In 2013, former NSA contractor Edward Snowden brought public attention to government mass data collection when he leaked NSA documents exposing top-secret NSA surveillance programs. Snowden insisted his exposure of potential highly volatile material was to bring attention to liberties he felt the government was unwarranted in conducting, and that the public had a right to be informed on how the government might be destroying their privacy.

Subsequent studies of these mass surveillance strategies differ wildly in their conclusions as to these programs’ efficacy in combatting terrorism, their stated aim for intrusive measures. According to a January, 2014 study by the New America Foundation, the NSA’s sense of usefulness of these programs may be overinflated. NSA-Surveillance-Program

“Our review of the government’s claims about the role that NSA ‘bulk’ surveillance of phone and email communications records has had in keeping the United States safe from terrorism shows that these claims are overblown and even misleading. An in-depth analysis of 225 individuals recruited by al-Qaeda or a like-minded group or inspired by al-Qaeda’s ideology, and charged in the United States with an act of terrorism since 9/11, demonstrates that traditional investigative methods, such as the use of informants, tips from local communities, and targeted intelligence operations, provided the initial impetus for investigations in the majority of cases, while the contribution of NSA’s bulk surveillance programs to these cases was minimal,” states the report. “Indeed, the controversial bulk collection of American telephone metadata, which includes the telephone numbers that originate and receive calls, as well as the time and date of those calls but not their content, under Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, appears to have played an identifiable role in, at most, 1.8 percent of these cases… The overall problem for U.S. counterterrorism officials is not that they need vaster amounts of information from the bulk surveillance programs, but that they don’t sufficiently understand or widely share the information they already possess that was derived from conventional law enforcement and intelligence techniques.”

For his part, Bell says Yahoo will continue to fight for transparency and the rights of its users.

“Despite the declassification and release, portions of the documents remain sealed and classified to this day, unknown even to our team. The released documents underscore how we had to fight every step of the way to challenge the U.S. Government’s surveillance efforts. At one point, the U.S. Government threatened the imposition of $250,000 in fines per day if we refused to comply,” stated Bell. “Our fight continues. We are still pushing for the FISC to release materials from the 2007-2008 case in the lower court… Users come first at Yahoo. We treat public safety with the utmost seriousness, but we are also committed to protecting users’ data. We will continue to contest requests and laws that we consider unlawful, unclear, or overbroad.”

Visit http://www.dni.gov to view the newly released documents.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Sources:

http://yahoopolicy.tumblr.com/post/97238899258/shedding-light-on-the-foreign-intelligence-surveillance

http://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/198-press-releases-2014/1109-statement-by-the-office-of-the-director-of-national-intelligence-and-the-u-s-department-of-justice-on-the-declassification-of-documents-related-to-the-protect-america-act-litigation

http://www.fjc.gov/

http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/do_nsas_bulk_surveillance_programs_stop_terrorists

 

Quarantine Fails: Infected Liberian Official Spreads Ebola

1

Written by: AnonymousWatcher

 

 

A Liberian government official, not a doctor, as the reports would have it, is responsible for the outbreak of Ebola in Nigeria. The government official claimed he was travelling to Nigeria for a seminar when his status was discovered. Since then, several civilians that came into contact with him have had to be quarantined until further notice.[1]

On the eve of one of the deadliest fights of the rampant Ebola epidemic in Africa, quarantine procedures have failed to contain the outbreak within the borders of the worst hit, Liberia. As this report hits the web, Liberia is suffering the highest fatality rate in West Africa. Up to 60 per cent of cases are ending in death. Consequentially, 80 health professionals including doctors, have died after contracting Ebola, raising the death toll to over 1000. [2]

According to the source interview for this article, the Nigerian government is acting accordingly, to contain the spread of the virus into the community. However, along with Sierra Leone and Liberia, Senegal and the Congo are just as severely affected with the outbreak, and are struggling to contain the spread over the borders. And when Liberia’s government quarantined the slum area of West Point, frustrations led to violent protests.

Curable in the early stages of Ebola, the unnamed source states it takes less than 4 weeks for the virus to claim its victim. So far, the source has witnessed it’s spread through direct contact either with the blood of an infected patient, or open wounds. He holds his faith in God and the CDC for the miracle they need to format a cure.

ALIB105-92_2014_122121_highA vendor selling grilled meat, left, walks past an amputee, right, who is suspected of dying from the Ebola virus in a busy street in Monrovia, Liberia, Tuesday, Sept. 2, 2014. Food in countries hit by Ebola is getting more expensive and will become scarcer because many farmers won’t be able to access fields, a U.N. food agency warned Tuesday. An Ebola outbreak in West Africa has killed more than 1,500 people, and authorities have cordoned off entire towns in an effort to halt the virus’ spread. (AP Photo/Abbas Dulleh)

Currently, in Sierra Leone, military force is being used to enforce a strict quarantine of every household in which an Ebola case appears. The measure lasts for 21 days. But the flag has now been raised about the possibility of it now affecting the entire population with a 50 percent fatality – until it “burns itself out.”  According to Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit of Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine in Hamburg, up to 5 million people could end up infected. Since then, the statement has specifically been retracted from the article without formal explanation. [3]

Studies in 1995 during an Ebola outbreak, suggested “7 out of 8 people survived” if treated with antibodies produced by victims infected blood. The experimental drug is still to be manufactured in the west, with experts investigating further, on how to combat this infection. [4]

_____________________________________________________________

References:

[1] Private Source (Nigeria), interviewed 14 September 2014, via email/phone.

[2] Brigitte Osterath (11 September 2014) “Virologist: Fight against Ebola in Sierra Leone and Liberia is lost.” (Retrieved 14 September 2014) http://web.archive.org/web/20140911183045/http://www.dw.de/virologist-fight-against-ebola-in-sierra-leone-and-liberia-is-lost/a-17915090

[3] Paul Joseph Watson (12 September 2014) “Virologist: ‘It’s Too Late, Ebola Will Kill 5 Million.’” Prison Plant.com (Retrieved 14 September 2014) http://www.prisonplanet.com/virologist-its-too-late-ebola-will-kill-5-million.html

[4] Sarah Rawlings  “Ebola Virus Outbreak Worsening.” (Retrieved 14 September 2014) http://deepcor.com/news/1210/ebola-virus-outbreak-worsening

Facebook Funded App Gives Free Internet Access For People in Zambia, Africa

3

Written By: Anon.Dos

 
About eighty five percent of the fifty million people have difficulty affording the cost of internet packages. So with the partnership of Facebook, Samsung, Ericsson, MediaTek, Nokia, Opera Software & Qualcomm launched their app Internet.org; on Android and web application. It aims to bring affordable Internet access to everybody with a free set of accessibilities including Facebook, Messenger, Wikipedia, and Google Search. It likewise gives nearby locations for hospitals, clinics, jobs, climate, and also provides information on women rights. MTIzMDQ5NjYzNjc1MjcwNjY4
The application was launched in Zambia before being launched in other developing nations. Its local service provider in Zambia is Airtel that gives the free access to Zambians that use pre-paid or top up services on Airtel. The Facebook Zero has been giving faster data access because of it being a lighter version of Facebook since 2010. Yet this new Internet.org application with different services will be available as a conservative, standalone Android application. Integrated with Facebook Android application and freely accessible as a mobile website that the gimmick phones carried by the vast majority of Zambians today.

As said earlier Internet.org, Facebook’s indulgence with 6 different telecom organizations are likewise working on drones and satellites to convey Internet connection network to the fifteen percent of individuals who are not connected to the internet because they live on remote zones with no or limited cell towers in reach. The target to get more individuals on the Internet is rather condemned as a Facebook development strategy taking on the appearance of selflessness or simply to make realize of brand. In this, Internet.org’s application will help grow Facebook by providing its Airtel users with free internet. airtel internet drones

But at the same time Internet.org product manager Guy Rosen protects the venture’s altruistic side by repeating Mark Zuckerberg’s white papers, letting the world know that Internet access can have a significant constructive effect on different opportunities and education for people in the developing countries of the world. According to Rosen they’ve built this program because it covers more than Facebook and because of which they can increase the number of people who are connected to the internet which is nine percent a year; looks like they really want to make that happen faster.
A bit of web for free and then the rest at a price.
Rosen also said that Internet.org’s application is intended to give services to all Zambians free of charge, while spreading familiarity with why the Internet is helpful and may be worth paying for. The four hundred and twenty five billion individuals who aren’t on the Internet however could be on account of traditional cellular connections are accessible that are usually of two types. The individuals who want to use the Internet yet can’t bear the cost of it on the grounds that data packages designed by companies are at times not affordable. Rosen said in one of his interviews that many individuals don’t understand what the Internet really is. They don’t know what it could accomplish for their lives and occupation. It’s a dubious idea.
Obviously this point of view emphasizes that the Internet is dubiously useful for individuals, which may not be valid for all societies. But the application is intended for individuals who would want the Internet as they know about it and could manage the cost of it.
To promote the Internet.org application in Zambia there were call-outs on the Facebook application, an awareness strategy and notifications to Airtel users. The country’s residents could then visit Internet.org from their cell phone or smartphone for a totally free entry point. On the other hand, they can pay for a little information to download the Internet.org application that is only of eight hundred kilobytes or the Facebook for Android application where the Internet.org application is integrated into a tab. internet-org-app

From these three indistinguishable entry points, users can utilize one of a choice of applications totally free of charge. These include:
• Facebook – Communicating with friends & family.
• Facebook Messenger – Direct messaging to friends and family.
• Google Search – Search engine though after the search results will require a data plan.
• Wikipedia – Internet Encyclopedia and all the internal Wikipedia links are free of charge.
• AccuWeather – Weather forecast which is important for farmers.
• Airtel – Careers information about internet packages.
• eZeLibrary – Information about the Zambian Government.
• Facts for Life (by UNICEF) – Information on health and hygiene including advice on pregnancy, childbirth, childhood illnesses, child development, parenting, protection, and child care.
• Go Zambia Jobs – Job search engine.
• Kokoliko – Job search engine.
• MAMA (Mobile Alliance for Maternal Action) – Information on maternal health
• WRAPP (Women’s Rights App) – Information about women’s rights and what needs to be done if they are being deprived of their rights.
• Zambia uReport (by UNICEF) – HIV and AIDS health information.
If you are thinking that why is Google in this application as they have their own internet accessibility project going on which is called Loon then understand that Facebook says that content providers in the application do not need to be official partners.
The Real Deal
Airtel pays for everything. Rosen in his interview to a journalist said that Facebook and Internet.org don’t pay whatsoever. Rather, the free access uses Airtel’s data plans.
If users of the app navigate to services outside of these services or use different applications, Internet.org shows users a road obstruction screen that cautions them they’ll be consuming their data package or need to purchase one. Zambians would then go to a neighborhood store and top-up with prepaid credit on Airtel if necessary. The model works on the grounds that Airtel accepts it can earn more money utilizing the free restricted access to drive users to purchase data plans and get back in their game that they were once the champs off. This works out well for locals because the individuals who can’t manage the cost of data plans get a ton assets at no expense in light of the fact that they’re viably sponsored by the individuals who can.
Facebook has been putting forth free access to a stripped down version of its service under the name of Facebook Zero since 2010 when it began with 50 operators in countries around the world. The program has been hailed for driving Facebook infiltration in African continent. mark-zuckerberg-2
In past six months, Internet.org own arrangements have worked out as expected. On a week ago earnings call, Zuckerberg’s said that their starting associations in the Philippines, Paraguay, and Tanzania have helped around three million individuals connect with the Internet who had no access before. And back in February at Mobile World Congress, he highlighted how the arrangements are conveying clients to its career partners. Talking about a Filipino Network Globe when he said “what we’re seeing in Globe users is the number of people who are using the internet — the data — was doubled, and Globe subscribers have grown by 25%, so it’s a home run.”
Zuckerberg wrote in one of his publications namely “Is Connectivity a Human Right?” saying he accepts that each individual should have access to free and basic internet services – instruments for health, education, occupations and basic correspondence. This is a capable stance that could do a great deal of good. Still, it is a bit unnerving that Facebook and Internet.org could choose what qualifies as a basic internet usage that could be offered for free. Notice in the picture above that Twitter is not on the list that is because Facebook’s worldwide appeal makes it a profitable partner to careers that need flagship services to indicate for why individuals should need the Internet, so it gets to take charge.
In the event that this application is a success in Zambia, we can expect Internet.org will move it out in different transporters and nations in Africa, Asia, and South America where the same data affordability issue holds on. What’s more if Facebook might be one of the first ways people experience the Internet, they won’t forget it as they get more and more familiar with the internet. It looks to me that selfishness can be used as a plan for business.

_______________________________________________________________

Sources:
http://techcrunch.com/2014/07/31/internet-org-app/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet.org