by Dan Sanchez at antiwar.com
As Cold War tensions ratchet up, the empire puts on an ICBM light show over its own most densely populated region
“Wait, what the f*** is that?”
Julien Solomita finally managed to spit that out after two minutes of dumbfounded silence as he recorded an unidentified flying object from a rooftop parking lot in Van Nuys, California on Saturday night.
He had been gathering footage for his video blog when he noticed a strange light in the sky. The light flared several times before developing a tail that expanded into a purple cone. The object then radiated nebulous purple rings and burst into a bright white bullet at the front of a huge white cloud, through which a vivid blue streak trailed across the night sky. Afterward, Solomita said:
“For a brief moment, when the cloud got bigger, I was wondering, ‘Should we run?’ It looked so close.”
His video has been viewed over 6 million times on YouTube. And the phenomenon was seen as far north as San Francisco and as far inland as Utah. Photographer Abe Blair got pictures of it above the San Francisco skyline, with the Golden Gate Bridge and Sutro Tower in view. And Justin Majeczky managed to capture it with time-lapse photography from a similar vantage.
Social media exploded with reports of UFO, comet, or missile sightings.
As the US military confirmed, it was indeed a missile, and a nuclear-capable one, too. What everyone saw was a test-fire of a Trident II intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) from a submarine off the coast. The bursts and flare-ups were probably the engine separations of the three-stage rocket.
The Pentagon claimed it was part of “scheduled, ongoing tests.” However, the launch was unannounced, except for being mysteriously foreshadowed the night before when the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) declared that all Los Angeles International airport (LAX) traffic must avoid flying over the nearby waters of the Pacific.
A second test-launch off the west coast was conducted Monday afternoon.
Following the launches, John M. Daniels, spokesman for what amounts to the Navy’s Armageddon Office,stressed that:
“It’s important that we test these missiles for our national security…”
How exactly would it enhance “national security” to test ICBMs in clear view of America’s second-biggest city? A hint was provided when The Los Angeles Times reported that:
“The Navy is considering posting additional photos — and possibly video — of the missile launches after the current exercises are completed, Daniels said, but it has yet to decide.”
This was more a demonstration than a test. That is the only plausible explanation for giving such a public light show.
A demonstration for the benefit of whom? Well it was over the Pacific, across which the US has been playing warship “chicken” with nuclear China in the South China Sea as part of its “Asian Pivot.”
Then of course there is Russia. The new Cold War with that nuclear power has ratcheted up after Russian entry into the Syrian war. As Justin Raimondo recently wrote:
“…the US and its NATO allies are prepositioning heavy weaponry on their eastern frontier and doubling the size of [the US/NATO] ‘Response Force’ in Europe.”
And as Jason Ditz reported, the Pentagon is trying to use tensions with Russia to justify a long-running, “massively expensive plan to revamp the entire US nuclear weapons arsenal.”
Indeed, Daniels admitted to The Washington Post that:
“As a result of doing these operations, it does show any adversary that would wish to do us harm the capabilities that we have…”
Loren Thompson, a military analyst and nuclear strategy expert, thought that the saber-rattling was mishandled:
“You could have demonstrated same point to the Russians or the Chinese without getting people really concerned in L.A. I suspect the Navy underestimated the social media reaction they were going to get.”
Thompson should cure his naïveté by reading some Randolph Bourne. The chief reason that governments wage wars, hot or cold, against foreign enemies is to use the “national emergency” to better dominate domestic enemies: its own subjects.
The unnerving spectacle made its biggest impression on the Americans who saw it first-hand. And they were probably its chief intended audience. “Getting people really concerned in L.A.” is exactly what the regime wanted.
Why else would the government clear the skies to paint them with nuclear war games precisely when and where it would have the biggest audience with the best visibility: near a basin full of people in the most densely populated region in the country, at a time (around 6:00 pm) when it is nice and dark, yet millions would be out and about, returning from work, or heading out to dinner?
This was “Shock and Awe” for domestic consumption: an exercise in missile test terrorism. A spooked herd is an easily steered and stampeded herd. And what better way to spook the American herd than by giving it nuclear nightmares?
This article (The Real Reason for the Missile Test over Southern California) originally appeared on AntiWar.com and was used with permission.
It wasn’t only over water Vegas and Palm Springs also got a show!
As far inland as Utah would imply that…
“As a result of doing these operations, it does show any adversary that would wish to do us harm the capabilities that we have…”
Launching an ICBM over Hollywood at night is “showing capabilities”? You must be kidding…
Crowd control capabilities.
Look at the capability we have to nuke your cities.
….. smh… so explain to me, in your very skewed perspective, how this isn’t showing capabilities?
Showing off usually not a good idea..
Now they know what 2 expect and we should just hope that they don’t surprise us as they surprised the germans in ww2.
A bunch of hooha. ..Vandenberg AFB has been launching ICBMS out over the Pacific since at least the mid 70’s they study the hinge operation of the MERVS since they may be coroding there are persistent planes down range that high speed film the reentry to make sure the missiles still function.the Russians usually know ahead of time and their ships end up at Kwajelein days before the launch to study our MERVs
http://abc30.com/science/navy-does-submarine-missile-test-off-coast-streaking-light-seen-across-california-/1073766/
The most recent UFO scare. Here’s my thing.
In the video, she states, “A bright, white light was spotted across California, and even parts of Arizona and Nevada this evening.”
That, as far as physics and mathematics, doesn’t make sense. There are all these sightings, across the US, but only the one in LA and nearby are being reported on fully. It’s literally impossible that this was the same phenomena.
The equation for calculating the maximum distance one can see, physically, from a spot on the planet is
d ≈ 1.22√h
{it’s ” ≈ ” because we’re leaving atmospheric refraction out of the equation}
d = distance in miles
h = height in feet
Even if you were standing on top of the Burj Khalifa (2,717 feet), you would only be able to see ≈63.59 miles in any given direction – and that’s, again, ignoring atmospheric refraction.
The border between California and Arizona is over 200 miles from Los Angeles (example: it’s 226 miles from LA, CA to Blythe, CA – which sits right on the CA-AZ border). The border between California and Nevada is also ≈200 miles from LA (Primm, NV sits on the border and is a straight shot of 227 miles from LA).
So, scientifically, that doesn’t even add up. I call bullshit. That is not a fucking “unarmed missile.” Fuck outta here with that.
I’m a believer, especially when the reported news makes literally no sense.
#UFO
As commelling as your argument is, can’t the human eye see the light of a candle from 30 miles away? at least, thats what google says:
(https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Miles+to+metres&oq=Miles+to+metres&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i64j0l3j5.3231j0j4&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8#q=how+far+can+the+human+eye+see)
nice formula, wrong application.
you’re formula says how far I can see something on the horizon. The missile in question was not only on the horizon, it went into the air, which people can see from further away.
using your logic, I shouldn’t be able to see the moon, but I can, because its not on the horizon.
Wait… you actually believe that calculation can be used for any aerial object at any altitude based only on the elevation of the observer?
LOL
I suppose you also believe, following your logic, that since you are observing from only 5-6 feet above ground, the moon is just a few miles away. That every jet you see on the horizon is just a few miles away. Etc.
Well, allow yourself to be severely educated.
That equation, as you have listed, can only be used to determine what is basically the line of sight distance between a ground based object (i.e. you) and an object of a given height (i.e. the obvious missile we are “discussing”). To be clear, yes, you more or less already said that but you clearly didn’t understand it in the slightest.
Getting past your gross conceptual error concerning the application of the equation, if you’d even bothered to read about the Trident missile or even look up basic specs on a generic ICBM, you’d have found that the altitude of the missile at the end of the burn phase would be in excess of 100 miles. Just to be super conservative, let’s assume 25 miles.
Using your equation, 1.22 times the square root of 132,000 feet would yield a maximum distance of 443 miles. More than enough to see it on the horizon well into Arizona or Nevada.
As far as physics and mathematics go, this is so entirely plausible and such an easily demonstrated/understood concept that it would only be argued against by an utter moron. You can see missiles from many hundreds of miles away, period. I have no idea how this isn’t common knowledge, or at least common knowledge to a person capable of writing at your level.
I hope you find a way to fix your paranoia and deficiencies in reasoning/basic mathematical concepts. The world doesn’t need any more confident, ignorant people running around spreading misinformation with what the casual observer may believe are well researched and written posts. So… try putting a similar effort into making yourself better.
It’s my understanding that a Trident missile can travel a distance of nearly 6,000 miles. That’s why it was possibly seen in many different places. I would like to know where it landed though; most likely in the San Diego coastal waters.
Right on the money.
A bunch of hooha. ..Vandenberg AFB has been launching ICBMS out over the Pacific since at least the mid 70’s they study the hinge operation of the MERVS since they may be coroding there are pursuit planes down range that high speed film the reentry to make sure the missiles still function.the Russians usually know ahead of time and their ships end up at Kwajelein days before the launch to study our MERVs
Thats not totally accurate. I saw the same light with the same rotation … in June 2012 in Lebanon. although we do not have any Missiles or Ships to do such tests. and the weird thing about it is that the light showed up suddenly without any prior movement or anything, it stayed for about 2 minutes at the same spot which is 100% not a missile.. then made a rotation like a cone a bit similar to (@) and left the area at a very high speed leaving a fog of light behind it for another few minutes. again this was in June 2012 and i was not alone to witness. the pictures are on my fb since that day.
Yes I’ve definitely seen this somewhere else as well. Months or years ago!
That is how far ON LAND you can see. The distance one can see from the ground in the ionosphere(where ICBM’s travel) is in the thousands of miles, and is the base premise on how satellite TV operates without having to have a sattelite every 63 miles. While I do believe we are not alone that was a textbook ICBM launch.
ALIENS
A lot of people here in Lubbock, TX saw this on that very same day. I’m skeptical about the paranaomal but I’m sure as shit that was no missile. Especially one that could been seen from CA all the way over here.
Why did they explode it over a populated area, and what did it release?
Since when is this allowed? What happens when one of these malfunctions? I know with current technology it’s unlikely, but that doesn’t mean its impossible.
Its been allowed since missiles first became common in the US military. Just because something does not happen often does not mean it is illegal.