Who is Barack Obama?

The evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii is overwhelming.

Obama’s birth on US soil—in Hawaii—-has been proven by (1) his Hawaii birth certificate; (2) the repeated confirmation of their sending it to Obama and all the facts on it being the same as what they sent by the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii; (3) the public Index Data file; (4) the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 (and ONLY the DOH could send birth notices to that section of the papers, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii); (5) the Hawaii teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, after hearing of the birth of a child to a woman NAMED STANLEY from the head of obstetrics at Kapiolani Hospital; (6) the INS inspector who checked on Obama’s father’s residence status and wrote: “They have one child, born in HONOLULU.”

Here are links to some documents (there are many more) that confirm the above:

Here are the confirmations of the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii, repeated confirmations (and by the way, the one to the secretary of state of Arizona, a conservative Republican, was ACCEPTED by the secretary of state of Arizona, who then put Obama on the ballot):

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/heres-the-birth-certificate/

Here is the confirmation by the former governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, a Republican (and a strong supporter of Sarah Palin’s), that says that Obama was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/05/hawaii_gov_lingle_answers_the.html

Here is the statement of the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, after being told of birth in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital, of a child to a woman named Stanley:

http://web.archive.org/web/20110722055908/http://mysite.ncnetwork.net/res10o2yg/obama/Teacher%20from%20Kenmore%20recalls%20Obama%20was%20a%20focused%20student%20%20Don%27t%20Miss%20%20The%20Buffalo%20News.htm

Here are the birth notices of Obama’s birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961:

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/obamabirth.php

(And as you can see the section of the paper is called “Health Bureau Statistics”. Well, as the name indicates, and as both the papers and the DOH confirm, ONLY the DOH could send notices to that section of the paper, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii.)

Here is the Index Data file:

http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2011/04/in_hawaii_its_easy_to_get_birt.html

Moreover, birther sites have not even shown that Obama’s mother had a passport in 1961, and it would have been rare for her to have one since so few 18-year-olds did in that year. And EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 (and she would have had to have traveled late in pregnancy since she was attending college for most of the year) because of the risk of stillbirths.

Yet a few GULLIBLE people just assume that she was one of the few 18-year-olds to have a passport and one of the EXTREMELY few women to travel abroad late in pregnancy, and that Obama’s birth certificate is forged AND the officials of BOTH parties are lying about it AND so is the Index Data AND so are the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 and stored on two separate microfilm rolls both of which are in two libraries in Hawaii.

And BTW, birther sites LIED about the Kenyan grandmother. She never said that Obama was born in Kenya. She said that he was born in Hawaii repeatedly. Birther sites simply did not quote her and cut off the tape recording on their sites just BEFORE she was asked where he was born (I wonder why they did that??) Her answer to the question where Obama was born was “In Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time.” (But birther sites refused to quote her and cut off the tape that included her statement.)

Every child born on US soil is a Natural Born US citizen except for the children of foreign diplomats, and Obama’s birth on US soil—in Hawaii—-has been proven by (1) his Hawaii birth certificate; (2) the repeated confirmation of their sending it to Obama and all the facts on it being the same as what they sent by the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii; (3) the public Index Data file; (4) the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 (and ONLY the DOH could send birth notices to that section of the papers, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii); (5) the Hawaii teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, after hearing of the birth of a child to a woman NAMED STANLEY from the head of obstetrics at Kapiolani Hospital; (6) the INS inspector who checked on Obama’s father’s residence status and wrote: “They have one child, born in HONOLULU.”

Did someone say brotherhood?

You are correct.

Nailed it. This article is so full of shit it stinks.

the ssn is what was given by barack, the ss administration is owned by the fed, so it is not a conservitive issue.the truth is you sir are the stirer of the pot. the credibility issue is you fail to look at what is reported and varified.

Someone seems offended. If we met and I told you I was born February 1st, 1993. You would believe me, right? But it doesn’t mean it’s true. He’s the fucking president. He can change his identity and become no one in the matter of seconds. Don’t be so fucking ignorant and wake the fuck up. Just because you know what he looks like, doesn’t mean we know more about Obama than the other presidents.

So, because you don’t have a handle on American history (or at the very least, know how to look it up), that means we must all know more about Obama? Go warm your bottle bro, because you’re far too cranky. Any of those things you listed can be quickly searched and verified in a matter of seconds…why can’t the same be said for Obama? Why all the mystery and confusion? If anything, he has himself to blame for being stubborn and waiting to release his documents.

I feel like the editor is brilliant. He or she or they… whatever this/these people are allow people to post what they feel needs to be posted. Exactly what the group Anonymous stands for, freedom of speech. I think that they are great for holding true to what they believe and having multiple people write with all types of ideas and thoughts. I think your comment is laughable. They mean what they say and they stand by people and their rights. its not about what YOU think is decent for the internet, its about FREEDOM to say what you want to say on the internet.

There are no real choices just the illusion of choices. There was no presidents race. No parties no survivor politics just insiders and outsiders and everyone’s an outsider at a certain level. All an elite imaginary group everyone is trying to get in. It’s like the Internet it’s here it’s there it’s everywhere but the source can’t be found or shut down. No choices just a system one beginning one conclusion. The most complex things ever made but a thing never the less. One and all are the same no difference from you and others no difference from you and the air u breathe just the illusion of it.

There are so many in the feds working behind the scenes for their own betterment that you will never know if its legit or not. They protect their own. And they own what they choose. Including Barak Obama.

Actually, they don’t. They knew his OLD SSN because he published it on his tax forms. But that is his OLD SSN. The reason that that failed the E-Verify test was that once Obama realized that he had published his SSN and that anyone could use it, he had it cancelled and got a new one. So, when the birthers did an E-Verify test of the only number that they had (the old one), it failed of course because it had been cancelled.

You are entitled to your opinion, and I’d fight to the death for your right to express it.

Derrik, you will get your wish. In two years his term will be up. Congrats.

i believe that the Constitution is not out dated and extremely relevant, especially at times like this. I would prefer that i had my rights protected rather than not… I honestly don’t see a problem with the Constitution. That is very extreme thinking that our Constitution is irrelevant TO THE PRESIDENT of the United States. I already know he ignores the Constitution, but those simple “outdated” words protect us.

Re: “My biggest one was that one of the document that said it had birth records in a newspaper gave the address (6085 Kalanianaole Hwy) of a house. ”

Answer: Are you claiming that there was not a house there? (I’m not sure if it was a private dwelling or an apartment house, but there was a HOUSE there. It was the address of Obama’s mother’s parents—and what is wrong with giving the address of your parents?)

Re: ““Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”, which is at the address of 1310 Punahou St Honolulu, HI 96826. ”

Answer: Here is the TELEPHONE NUMBER of Kapiolani: (808) 983-6000 Call that number, ask for the PR department and ask what the legal address for the hospital was in 1961. (And, BTW, you might as well ask for the full legal name of the hospital in 1961. It was indeed Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital—-the same words as on Obama’s birth certificate and on the birth certificates of the Nordyke Twins born one day after Obama at the same hospital whose birth certificates are shown on WND’s web site.

You have asked a few minor questions showing that you have an inquiring mind and are not prepared to accept claims by officials or posters whom you disagree with. Well, why do you accept the claims by the birthers?

HERE is what would have had to have happen for Obama to have been born in a foreign country.

For Obama to have been born in a foreign country:

(1) Obama’s relatives would have had to have been rich enough (and they weren’t. In 1961 Obama’s grandfather was a furniture salesman, and his grandmother was a low-level employee in a bank [she did not become a vice president until 1970], and his father went from Kenya to Hawaii on a free flight) and dumb enough to send their daughter at high risk of stillbirth to a foreign country to give birth—-—despite there being fine hospitals in Hawaii;

(2) Obama’s mother would have had to have traveled overseas ALONE (since WND has proven with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961) and somehow got Obama back to the USA without getting him entered on her US passport or getting a visa for him (which would have had to have been applied for in a US consulate in that country and the records would still exist);

(3) Obama’s relative would have had to have gotten the officials in Hawaii to record his birth in Hawaii despite (as birthers claim) his being born in another country and somehow got the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley to lie (and since the woman’s father’s name really was Stanley, Obama’s relatives would have had to have found one of the very few women in Hawaii with fathers of that name to do it).

(Oh, and there isn’t even proof that Obama’s mother had a passport in 1961, and very very few 18-year-olds did, and EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 because of the risk of stillbirths. Yet birther sites hope that a few GULLIBLE people will just assume that she was one of the few to have a passport and one of the extremely few women to travel abroad late in pregnancy, and that the birth certificate is forged and the officials of BOTH parties who have confirmed it and the Index Data and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers and the teacher who wrote home are all lying. )

Birther sites did not tell you any of those facts, and you should ask yourself why they didn’t. They didn’t for the same motive that made birther sites claim that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said he was born in Kenya—-when she actually said that he was born IN HAWAII in three different interviews, of which birther sites showed only part of one, cutting off the tape recordings on their sites just before she was asked where he was born—and to which she replied: “In Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time.”

So birther sites lied, and by saying “there is no doubt he was born elsewhere” you showed that you believed them. That’s not checking all sides. It isn’t checking at all.

Obama has shown both his Hawaii short-form BC (the Certification of Live Birth, COLB, which is the OFFICIAL birth certificate of Hawaii, used by thousands of people to get their US passports every year, and, BTW, he showed it way back in June 2008, five months before the election), and he has shown his long form Hawaii BC.

And the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they SENT them to him, and that all the facts, repeat ALL the facts, are exactly the same, repeat, EXACTLY the same, as what they sent to him. The fact that Hawaii issued a birth certificate for Obama in 1961 (when Hawaii was not allowed by its law to issue birth certificates to children born outside of Hawaii) is also confirmed by the public Index Data file and the birth notice in the “Health Bureau Statistics” section of the newspapers (which ONLY the DOH could send birth notices to) and by the INS inspector who checked on Obama’s father’s status and wrote: “one child, born in Honolulu”—and by the Hawaii teacher who wrote home about Stanley having a baby.

Moreover, there is no indication whatever that Obama’s mother even had a PASSPORT in 1961, and very very few 18-year-olds did at the time, and EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad in the last few months of pregnancy—because of the high risk of stillbirth (and Obama’s mother could not have traveled earlier because of the college schedule). And she would have had to have traveled ALONE, since WND has proven with a FOI request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961.

Yet a few GULLIBLE people just assume that Obama’s mother had a passport and took that risky and unusual trip alone——and that Obama’s birth certificate is forged and that the officials of both parties in Hawaii (including the former Republican governor) are lying, and that the Index Data and the birth notices are forged, and that the INS inspector made an error in his “one child, born in Honolulu” note, and that the teacher who wrote home was lying. But you’d have to be terribly GULLIBLE to think that all of that happened.

Oh, BTW, for the birth notices to have been forged, they would have had to have been forged on two separate rolls of microfilm, one for each newspaper, and then the old rolls removed from two separate libraries and the forged microfilm rolls substituted.

First, I did use conservative sources… but is there something wrong with Conservative sources? I dont just go around looking for the most conservative sources out there, I look at both liberal and conservative websites and use both as well. I cant believe that you would dismiss something just because it has different views than you. Thats the very definition of being close-minded.