NBC has been facing questions about pulling out their most experienced correspondent, Ayman Mohyeldin, a veteran reporter of Gaza, after he witnessed the killing of four Palestinian boys whom he had been kicking a soccer ball around with on the beach. He witnessed it first-hand, and with years of foreign correspondence under his belt; where this was one of his biggest coverage opportunities of Gaza, he was removed and told to leave. The reason cited was ‘security concerns,’ which Mohyeldin argued against.
But it begs the question why, when almost immediately after, another NBC reporter and producer who had never been to Gaza, were sent in for future correspondence on the Gaza coverage.
Mohyeldin initially started working as a reporter for Al-Jazeera but moved to the mainstream news arena in hope of bringing his news coverage to the world. While reporting for Al-Jazeera, Mohyeldin was the only inside western journalist due to the media blockade at the time surrounding ‘Operation Cast Lead.’ An excerpt cited by the Democracy News site is direct from his time during the coverage of the military operation.
“You had a propaganda machine that was in full swing to portray the war as a just war, as a necessary war, a war of self-defense. And when you have a PR machine that is portraying everyone in Gaza as a Hamas sympathizer, as a terrorist sympathizer, and that justifies the kind of bombardment that was the biggest challenge that we had to contend with—reporting the truth in the face of that spin.”
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and associate of Ayman Mohyeldin, Greenwald, reflects on the reaction by NBC to pull one of the most experienced reporters from the area. Greenwald argues that the excuse of citing a security risk to Mohyeldin doesn’t represent the underlying causes. It doesn’t make sense.
“What happened on the day that he witnessed the beach attacks was he posted some incredible tweets and, as well, some amazing photos and videos on both his Facebook and Instagram accounts about the reaction of the parents of the Palestinian boys learning right that moment that they had been killed — very, very powerful stuff. And he had also tweeted a couple of what I guess in the network news business is viewed as some unusually pointed tweets about the position of the U.S. government. Namely that the State Department spokeswoman was asked about this killing and she essentially absolved Israel and blamed Hamas, what the U.S. government always does even in the most egregious cases of Israeli war crimes. And he went onto Twitter and Facebook and posted some very mild comments, essentially noting what the State Department had said, and then inviting people to comment on it. And later that day, he deleted it…
But certainly the whole context of what has happened here is that he is a very unique reporter, especially for a network news position. You know, the kind of reporting that – the amazing reporting that we just hear from Sharif usually is not the kind of reporting that you hear on the network news – and Ayman does that kind of reporting. And he’s been criticized for it by neo-conservative outlets, calling him a Hamas sympathizer and the like. So for NBC to remove him at exactly the moment where he brought the humanity of this war and the humanity of Gazans to the world, at the same time that he posted some tweets that in network news land would be considered controversial because it questions the U.S. government and the Israeli position, at the very least looks awful, and I think for NBC News’ credibility, demands that they provide some answers about what really happened here.”
The most interesting of the comments by Greenwald is the utter fear carried by media that reporting on Israel spurs. He cites that the dread of upsetting the pro-Israelis in America really ‘can’t be overstated.’ It leads back to the question of the propaganda machine and why such a credible journalist was removed from the environment.
The complete interview can be listened, viewed or read here.
Though I think we can all agree killing children is frowned upon, there are a couple facts this article doesn’t state. A. The reporter is going back to Gaza this weekend. Nbc just wanted to reevaluate him it seems, which is understandable as they need to make sure he’s still able to keep going after seeing that. B. The children were killed in a strike, which I assume to be an air strike. Its still not a justified act, but I doubt the isralies were intentionally targeting children. These two facts definitely should have been stated. The point of this site should be to give us unbiased news, not just left wing, anti-war viewpoints. I myself agree with many left wing view points on the war, but a news article shouldn’t be taking sides.
It was never a war. A war is war is, when both sides have tanks, planes and whatever can cause mass destruction. Having puny rockets and stones is not war. WW1, WW2 that was war cause they faced each other hand to hand and countless lives were lost both sides. Today you have cowards using technology to fight wars. These bastards create wars to try out their new technology on defenceless people. I dare them to attack the government’s of the Far East, then we will see a war.
So if several people armed with knives will try to kill you, you will not shoot them because they do not have guns?
Steve, that was some repugnantly egregious evasion there, my friend.
We all know what’s going on in Israel and Palestine. It’s been the same since Israel was founded in blood, theft, and ethnic cleansing. And we’re a party to it, and have been for decades, and your little misguided spin-doctoring won’t do a thing to change that, except maybe embarrass us Americans even further.
Well said Reason Prevails, the Israeli government and war machine will never stop while the US is funding and organizing the genocide. As the US government has been bought by the dual citizen Jews in the US and is run as a personal army by the Jews, I cannot see anything changing soon. Only IF the country is destroyed (US) will anything change.
If the Palestinians and other Arabs did not try to kill the Jews and destroy their state the Jews would not have to fight back.
for U.S. government and Israeli government wana strike fear in to the rebels they are not terroris’t are they
TERRORISM IS DELIBERATE ATTACKING OF NON- COMBATANTS WITH POLITICAL GOALS.
You said: “The children were killed in a strike, which I assume to be an air strike. Its still not a justified act, but I doubt the isralies were intentionally targeting children. These two facts definitely should have been stated.” How do you know the Israeli did not target the children on purpose? Do you have any knowledge of the IDF’s motive and the way they operate. You yourself said that you “doubt” that the Israelis were intentionally targeting children. But in the next sentence, this doubt is promoted to a fact. Explain yourself.
If a puny, diseased woman punches a big, strong man, and he hits her back, is that not a physical fight?
10,000 rockets fired onto one city, in only a couple of years, is not equatable with stone throwing.
If Hamas used its funds on education, as opposed to propaganda and rockets, then maybe it’s technology would be as good as the Israelis. Oh wait, then Israel could not be blamed for being cowardly ingenious.
P.S. In the first Palestinian charter, Gaza was not part of Palestine.
Learn your facts, this is so annoying.