Home Blog Page 89

Company Will Pay You $3,000 a Month to Smoke Weed Every Day

3

Have you or a friend ever thought of quitting your job and sitting around your pad, smoking weed all day?

What if you were actually paid to do that—not only with free cannabis, but $3,000 a month?

Sounds like a stoner fantasy, no? Like something your pothead friend might bring up after too many hits of that top-shelf stuff?

But this is no dream—American Marijuana, which was founded in 2014 and bills itself as one of “the most trusted medical marijuana resources online,” is currently hiring to fill the position of a “Cannabis Product Reviewer.”

The job role is simple—you smoke, and then you write up some “honest and reliable insights on various cannabis products,” the job listing reads. Importantly, the company notes:

“This job is 100% for real and it’s an important job that includes more than just getting paid to smoke weed. If you think that’s the entire scope of the job, then this might not be for you.”

Instead, as American Marijuana explains:

“Every month, the lucky applicant will be shipped a box containing different brands and varieties of cannabis products every month.

These products range from weed strains, vapes, edibles to CBD oils. 

The applicant will then test the products in person and write about their experience with the product from unboxing to everything they’ll be doing with the product.”

And yes, there is some labor involved—although making and watching unboxing videos on YouTube has become a hobby for many people in recent years.

Continuing, American Marijuana says:

“The applicant will have to write about their honest reviews and opinions of the product in the form of a blog.

Moreover, they must also be comfortable in front of the camera since the job includes unboxing videos and explainer videos of how each cannabis product performs and differs from other, more notable products in the category.”

Candidates can apply HERE. Just send in your CV and resume, a headshot or video, some links to your social media accounts, and list of six strains of cannabis that you’re acquainted with. They don’t just want any random person off the streets!

Another requirement is that you must live in a state in the U.S. or Canada where medical cannabis is legal—so if you’re living in a state that’s still stuck in the MJ prohibition era, don’t expect to connect with your plug who hangs around the corner near the liquor store and get paid to write about his dirt-weed.

The company also requires that applicants are 18 or older and should be “physically fit and healthy in general.”

As the site explains:

“If you think you got the guts to smoke weed every day (plays Snoop Dogg song) and get paid doing it, you might just be the guy we need. But DO NOT expect us to hire you just because you can smoke because we’re looking for a guy who also has extensive knowledge of marijuana to educate our readers.”

By Elias Marat | Creative Commons | TheMindUnleashed.com



Continue reading by clicking here

Distracted Cop Crashed Watching GTA Clips While Driving — Puts Woman in Coma

0

While on a busy interstate highway, a police officer in Gwinnett County, Georgia was too busy watching a Grand Theft Auto playthrough on YouTube to pay attention to the road, ultimately causing a terrible crash.

The officer, Todd Ramsey, wasn’t injured, but the woman that he hit nearly died and ended up in a coma as a result of the crash.

According to WJCL, the officer was going nearly 70 mph in stop-and-go traffic during rush hour on I-85.

When other officers arrived on the scene, it was hard for them to cover for their “brother in blue” because he couldn’t give them any details about the incident or even describe the car that he hit. “Do you know what car it is? He says he doesn’t know,” one of the officers can be heard saying in body camera footage.

The victim of the crash, Sarah Wood, says she was only going about 6 mph in rush hour traffic when she was rear-ended by a speeding vehicle. “I was sitting in traffic and pretty much next thing I knew, I woke up in the hospital. I don’t remember anything after that,” Wood explained.

Ramsey was going so fast when he crashed into the back of her car, that items from her trunk ended up inside of the police car.

Wood’s attorney, Susan Witt said that it was obvious that the officer was not paying attention to the road. “I don’t believe there was any attempt to stop or swerve because he didn’t see her because he wasn’t looking,” Witt said.

Wood spent four weeks in a coma after the crash, and can no longer work because of a traumatic brain injury caused by the crash.

After the incident, the Gwinnett County Police Department opened an internal investigation to determine the cause of the crash and found that Ramsey had multiple browser screens open at the time. In the moments leading up to the crash, a YouTube video of the game Grand Theft Auto was displayed on the screen.

Ramsey denied these claims, saying instead that he was having a problem with his contact lenses.

Local news channel WSBTV, filed an open records request for Ramsey’s disciplinary records and discovered that the officer was at fault in 8 other accidents that took place while he was on duty. Ramsey suffered no legal consequences for his actions, but he was demoted from master police officer to police officer senior six months after the crash. He was also reassigned and “prohibited from driving or operating a Gwinnett County vehicle for any reason.”

However, Wood’s attorney doesn’t think that Ramsey should be absolved from legal responsibility just because he’s a police officer.

“I don’t want to call this an accident. This wasn’t an accident; this was a serious collision that should of and could have been avoided. I don’t understand why these officers should be exempt from adhering to the rules that apply to everyone else,” Witt said.

Assange “Could Die in Prison” Without Urgent Medical Care, 60+ Doctors Warn

0

Following an urgent warning from an expert at the United Nations earlier this month that Julian Assange’s mistreatment in prison may amount to life-threatening torture, more than 60 doctors from around the world Monday called on officials in the United Kingdom to act immediately to ensure the WikiLeaks founder receives proper medical attention.

In their letter to British Home Secretary Priti Patel and Shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott, the doctors—including physicians practicing in the U.K., Sri Lanka, the U.S., and several other countries—expressed grave concerns over Assange’s deteriorating health as a result of his seven-year confinement in the Ecuadorian embassy in London and subsequent incarceration by British authorities as he awaits possible extradition to the United States.

“We have real concerns, on the evidence currently available, that Mr. Assange could die in prison,” the doctors wrote. “The medical situation is thereby urgent.”

Assange is currently serving a 50-week sentence in prison for violating his bail conditions in 2012 and is facing charges in the U.S. under the Espionage Act for exposing human rights violations and evidence of war crimes by the U.S. government. He is set to appear in court in February for an extradition hearing.

“Mr. Assange was unable to exercise his right to free and necessary expert medical assessment and treatment throughout the seven-year period,” the physicians added.

While he was examined by a number of medical experts during his confinement, Assange was not permitted to go to a hospital even as he reported stiffness and inflammation in his shoulder which first appeared nearly four years ago. He has also exhibited signs of moderate to severe depression and major dental health issues.

Last month, the doctors wrote, former British ambassador Craig Murray published an eyewitness account of Assange’s current state describing him as exhibiting “exactly the symptoms of a torture victim.” Shortly after, U.N. Special Rapporteur on Torture Nils Melzer accused the U.K. government of “outright contempt for Mr. Assange’s rights and integrity.”

“It is our opinion that Mr. Assange requires urgent expert medical assessment of both his physical and psychological state of health,” wrote the medical experts. “There is no time to lose.”

On social media, supporters of Assange expressed alarm and anger at the government’s decision to allow his health to deteriorate so significantly.

“Revealing stuff that should have been in the public domain all along should be treated as a public service, not a crime,” Guardian columnist and political activist George Monbiot wrote Monday.”But Julian Assange is rotting in jail, awaiting extradition, at the behest of a government that wants to preserve its grim secrets.”


By Julia Conley | CommonDreams.org | Creative Commons

Epstein Tapes? Sordid Case Takes a Bizarre Turn After Mystery ‘Hacker’ Emerges

0

Shortly after Jeffrey Epstein’s August death in a Manhattan detention facility, a shadowy figure claiming to have set up encrypted servers for the convicted sex offender told several attorneys and the New York Times he had a vast archive of incriminating evidence against powerful men stored on overseas servers, including several years worth of the financier’s communications and financial records which allegedly showed he had vast amounts of Bitcoin and cash in the Middle East and Bangkok, and hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of gold, silver and diamonds.

Going by the pseudonym Patrick Kessler, self-described ‘hacker’ said he had “thousands of hours of footage from hidden cameras” from Epstein’s multiple properties, which included former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, lawyer Alan Dershowitz, and Prince Andrew, along with three billionaires and a prominent CEO, according to the Times.

It has been long speculated that Epstein recorded his high-profile guests as part of an international blackmail operation.

Armed with nothing more than blurry photos of what he claimed were high-profile individuals in compromising situations, Kessler approached lawyers representing several Epstein accusers,  John Pottinger and David Boies – the former of whom suggested that billionaire Sheldon Adelson – an ally of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – might pay for the alleged footage of Barak.

According to excerpts viewed by The Times, Mr. Pottinger and Kessler discussed a plan to disseminate some of the informant’s materials — starting with the supposed footage of Mr. Barak. The Israeli election was barely a week away, and Mr. Barak was challenging Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The purported images of Mr. Barak might be able to sway the election — and fetch a high price. –New York Times.

After several weeks, the attorneys invited the New York Times to speak with Kessler in mid-September. Then things got even more unbelievable. Following a mid-September meeting with The Times in the Boies Schiller offices, Kessler went rogue – contacting the paper and accusing Boies and Pottinger of an extortion plot against the subjects of said tapes.

https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1201024027973697537?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1201024027973697537&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2F

Barely an hour after the session ended, the Times reporters received an email from Kessler: “Are you free?” He said he wanted to meet — alone. “Tell no one else.”

Kessler complained that Mr. Boies and Mr. Pottinger were more interested in making money than in exposing wrongdoers. He pulled out his phone, warned the reporters not to touch it, and showed more of what he had. There was a color photo of a bare-chested, gray-haired man with a slight smile. Kessler said it was a billionaire. He also showed blurry, black-and-white images of a dark-haired man receiving oral sex. He said it was a prominent C.E.O.

At one point, he showed what he said were classified C.I.A. documents,” writes the Times.

Weeks after the meeting, the lawyers struck a deal with the Times during the last Friday in September. They would send a team overseas to download Kessler’s evidence from his servers (and had alerted the FBI and the US Attorney’s Office in Manhattan of their intention to do so), and would then share all the evidence with the paper on the condition that they would have discretion over which men could be written about, and when.

Separately, Kessler had arranged to give the Times his evidence using a convoluted series of steps. On the day the data was to be transmitted, Kessler canceled at the 11th hour, claiming ‘a fire was burning’ and he had to flee to Ukraine. 

In early October, Kessler said he was ready to produce the Epstein files. He told The Times that he had created duplicate versions of Mr. Epstein’s servers. He laid out detailed logistical plans for them to be shipped by boat to the United States and for one of his associates — a very short Icelandic man named Steven — to deliver them to The Times headquarters at 11 a.m. on Oct. 3.

Kessler warned that he was erecting a maze of security systems. First, a Times employee would need to use a special thumb drive to access a proprietary communications system. Then Kessler’s colleague would transmit a code to decrypt the files. If his instructions weren’t followed precisely, Kessler said, the information would self-destruct.

Specialists at The Times set up a number of “air-gapped” laptops — disconnected from the internet — in a windowless, padlocked meeting room. Reporters cleared their schedules to sift through thousands of hours of surveillance footage.

On the morning of the scheduled delivery, Kessler sent a series of frantic texts. Disaster had struck. A fire was burning. The duplicate servers were destroyed. One of his team members was missing. He was fleeing to Kyiv.

Except two hours later, Kessler contacted Pottinger and didn’t mention any emergency. Instead, he asked Pottinger to formulate two schemes for prying up to $1 billion from potential targets with the footage which the Times suggested may have been a trap.

Pottinger obliged, describing two options for capitalizing on the evidence. The first, a “standard model” for legal settlements, would include splitting the money among Epstein’s victims, a charitable foundation, Kessler, and the lawyers – who would get up to 40%.

In the second hypothetical, the lawyers would approached the high-profile men, convince them to hire them to ensure they wouldn’t get sued, and then “make a contribution to a nonprofit as part of their retainer.”

Pottinger would effectively represent a victim, settle their case, and then represent the victim’s alleged abuser – a legal, yet morally questionable practice for an attorney to engage in.

Dershowitz and the Weird Recorded Phone Call

In late September, Dershowitz’s secretary related a message that Kessler wanted to speak with him about Boies – with whom Dershowitz has a long-running feud. Dershowitz recorded the call, during which Kessler said he no longer trusted Boies and Pottinger.

“The problem is that they don’t want to move forward with any of these people legally,” said Kessler, adding “They’re just interested in trying to settle and take a cut.”

“Who are these people that you have on videotape?” Mr. Dershowitz asked.

“There’s a lot of people,” Kessler said, naming a few powerful men. He added, “There’s a long list of people that they want me to have that I don’t have.”

“Who?” Mr. Dershowitz asked. “Did they ask about me?”

“Of course they asked about you. You know that, sir.”

“And you don’t have anything on me, right?”

“I do not, no,” Kessler said.

“Because I never, I never had sex with anybody,” Mr. Dershowitz said. Later in the call, he added, “I am completely clean. I was at Jeffrey’s house. I stayed there. But I didn’t have any sex with anybody.”

As the Times asks, “what was the purpose of Kessler’s phone call? Why did he tell Mr. Dershowitz that he wasn’t on the supposed surveillance tapes, contradicting what he had said and showed to Mr. Boies, Mr. Pottinger and The Times? Did the call sound a little rehearsed?”

Dershowitz told the Times he has no idea why Kessler called him.

Holding Out Hope

In a November 7 email, Boies told the Times “I still believe he is what he purported to be,” adding “I have to evaluate people for my day job, and he seemed too genuine to be a fake, and I very much want him to be real.”

That said, he also noted “I am not unconscious of the danger of wanting to believe something too much.”

Ten days later, Mr. Boies arrived at The Times for an on-camera interview. It was a bright, chilly Sunday, and Mr. Boies had just flown in from Ecuador, where he said he was doing work for the finance ministry. Reporters wanted to ask him plainly if his and Mr. Pottinger’s conduct with Kessler crossed ethical lines.

Would they have brokered secret settlements that buried evidence of wrongdoing? Did the notion of extracting huge sums from men in exchange for keeping sex tapes hidden meet the definition of extortion?

Mr. Boies said the answer to both questions was no. He said he and Mr. Pottinger operated well within the law. They only intended to pursue legal action on behalf of their clients — in other words, that they were a long way from extortion. In any case, he said, he and Mr. Pottinger had never authenticated any of the imagery or identified any of the supposed victims, much less contacted any of the men on the “hot list.”

When the Times showed Boies text exchanges between Kessler and Pottinger, he “showed a flash of anger and said it was the first time seeing them.”

Eventually, Boies concluded that Kessler was probably a con man.

“I think that he was a fraudster who was just trying to set things up,” adding that he had probably baited Pottinger into writing things that were more nefarious than they really were.

Pottinger, meanwhile, claims he was stringing Kessler along – “misleading him deliberately in order to get to the servers.”

Despite Kessler’s story falling apart, the Times asks if his claims are plausible.

Did America’s best-connected sexual predator accumulate incriminating videos of powerful men?

Two women who spent time in Mr. Epstein’s homes said the answer was yes. In an unpublished memoir, Virginia Giuffre, who accused Mr. Epstein of making her a “sex slave,” wrote that she discovered a room in his New York mansion where monitors displayed real-time surveillance footage. And Maria Farmer, an artist who accused Mr. Epstein of sexually assaulting her when she worked for him in the 1990s, said that Mr. Epstein once walked her through the mansion, pointing out pin-sized cameras that he said were in every room.

I said, ‘Are you recording all this?’” Ms. Farmer said in an interview. “He said, ‘Yes. We keep it. We keep everything.’”

During a 2005 search of Mr. Epstein’s Palm Beach, Fla., estate, the police found two cameras hidden in clocks — one in the garage and the other next to his desk, according to police reports. But no other cameras were found.

So – it appears that Kessler was either a fraud or an operative, and the entire saga may have been designed to cast doubt over whether tapes actually exist. Or, Kessler is for real – and for some reason hasn’t found a way to release the videos. That said, since he says he’s not interested in extortion, what’s the hold-up?


By Tyler Durden | ZeroHedge.com | Republished with permission

Pamela Anderson Says She Was Threatened by Prison Chief While Visiting Assange

0

Pamela Anderson, actress, model, and longtime friend of Julian Assange, says she was threatened by a warden while visiting the high security prison where Assange is currently being held.

According to the Daily Mail, Anderson had planned to go public with her story of what happened that day during a speech she planned to give in Canberra, Australia, but pulled out of the planned event due to a scheduling conflict.

Anderson was in Australia, Assange’s home country, to urge Prime Minister Scott Morrison to intervene for her friend. Morrison responded to Anderson via letter that was published by the Australian. In it the prime minister said Australia’s government could continue to monitor the case but that “beyond providing consular assistance…Australia has no standing and is unable to intervene in Mr Assange’s legal proceedings.”

transcript of what would have been Anderson’s speech directed toward Australian officials, was obtained by the Mail.

In it the 52-year-old model revealed that near the end of her meeting with Assange at Belmarsh, “The warden stormed in and made it very clear to me, that if I were going to be a problem—he’d make problems for Julian. It was a direct threat.”

The transcript also details that Anderson was “scared and stressed” when she and WikiLeaks editor Kristinn Hrafnsson visited Assange at the U.K.’s Belmarsh high security prison for the first time but that the jailed journalist was “clean shaven” with “bright” eyes.

Anderson explained:

“He was ready to fight—smart/clever as always. His mind working fast.

But what was abnormally out of character—he was looking to us like his life depended on us. He was looking to us for hope.”

According to the transcript, Anderson’s feelings of “hope” soon vanished when the wardenor “governor” in the UKbarged in only “minutes before our time was up.”

She maintains that Assange, 48, is “is in danger,” explaining:

“When he is out of our sight he is in danger.

I’m sure he is being punished for every bad word said about that prison.

So I’m taking a big risk here. To let you know—it is a different set of rules there.

There are no rules. That benefit him. Remember this.”

A UK Prison Service spokesman said in response to Anderson’s allegations:

“The Governor of HMP Belmarsh did not threaten Ms Anderson or Mr Assange.”

The revelation from Anderson comes only days after 60 doctors from around the world called on officials to immediately act to secure necessary medical care for Assange. The doctors acted following a warning from a United Nations expert early this month who claims Assange’s treatment may actually be torture.

The doctor’s wrote:

“We have real concerns, on the evidence currently available, that Mr. Assange could die in prison. The medical situation is thereby urgent.”

After visiting Assange in prison in May, Anderson was left “sick and nauseous,” telling reporters:

“He does not deserve to be in a supermax prison. He has never committed a violent act. He is an innocent person.

He is a good man, he is an incredible person. I love him, I can’t imagine what he has been going through.

It was great to see him, but this is just misrule of law in operation. It is absolute shock that he has not been able to get out of his cell.”

Assange is being held at Belmarsh awaiting an extradition hearing set to take place in February 2020 that may result in his facing charges of violating the Espionage Act in the United States after publishing evidence of human rights violations and war crimes at the hands of the U.S. government.

Journalist and activist George Monbiot wrote last week:

“Revealing stuff that should have been in the public domain all along should be treated as a public service, not a crime. But Julian Assange is rotting in jail, awaiting extradition, at the behest of a government that wants to preserve its grim secrets.”

Read the full text of Anderson’s speech:

Dear all concerned

Thank you for attending this event.

I feel honored to have been invited here within this Australian parliament House and from the outset I want to acknowledge that I am standing on the land of the Ngunnawal People (Pronounced “N”-Gun-a-Wal} and I pay my respects to their elders past and present whose land, wind, water and creation spirits we all now share.

Emotionally and professionally I feel the welcome and warmth of the Australian people

and feel a sense of honor to have been invited to this great place by such an outstanding group of dedicated and outstanding representatives of the great people that are Australians.

I am here to join with you and with the majority of Australians that want Julian Assange brought home to Australia.

By any stretch of the imagination it is clear that a significant majority of Australians want the Australian Government to intervene with their counterparts to bring Julian Assange Home.

This is validated apparently by 60 Minutes Australia independent polling that confirmed that between 73% and 92 % of respondents want the Australian government to bring Julian home.

He doesn’t want ‘special treatment’, he just wants to be treated like any other Australian citizen

and journalist, he has not committed any crime for which a precedent in law stands.

Every Australian needs to be aware that if Julian Assange is extradited to the USA for publishing – then every other journalist and publisher of facts on the internet is vulnerable of execution or 175 years imprisonment for simply publishing facts that were delivered to him by whistleblowers.

Remembering that is exactly the stated practice of every investigative journalist that works for the ABC, SBS, Chanel 9, 10, 7 and Sky here in Australia.

And pay particular attention that if Julian is extradited to the USA for what he is being charged with then every other journalist is vulnerable through the Westminster legal process of the law of Precedent.

Julian only did what is the charter of every investigative journalist in Australia.

To publish news that is deemed in the public interest.

Julian Assange performed his professional duties with exemplary results and has been awarded as a great journalist accordingly.

I was very sad and angry like many were when Julian was dragged out of the embassy into the outside light, into that van.

A political asylee being delivered to the very inhumane process he had been granted asylum from.

Where was the adherence to international protocols for this Australian citizen granted political asylum and in London.

He had been progressively isolated into a smaller and smaller space, under surveillance 24/7,

his conversations and every movement secretly watched and apparently recorded for the very entity he had been granted asylum against.

Then without warning and after weeks of his shaving equipment being withheld

to make him look untidy – he was literally dragged out and thrown in to a van,

for more psychological torture.

His legal papers stolen and all his legal case notes were seized and all handed over to the USA.

How is that a fair legal process.

Then he is further psychologically tortured thrown into a super max prison ?

With mass murders and the most violent and brutal of humanity.

This for an international hero, awarded journalist and Australian citizen.

Arguable the most awarded Australian journalist in history.

To quote his father John Shipton ‘Julian is a kind and gentle man.’

Can you imagine?

It was the cruelest moment – and it hurt me terribly.

I could only imagine what it felt like for him.

My heart broke. My blood boiled and the handsome gracious man I knew looked truly unrecognizable/awful.

I hadn’t seen him since they took his internet away.

His only connection to the outside world.

Slowly painfully trying to destroy his spirit.

Break him.

Kill him.

It is clear to all and if I can quote his mother Christine Assange, ‘he is being slowly assassinated.’

And all this in plain sight.

I was relieved actually after visiting him in prison.

It was the anticipation that scared me much more than sitting across

from him finally.

In a tiny interrogation room.

To protect me?

From other prisoners ?

Even though I was scared and stressed to see my friend after what he’d been out through.

He was clean shaven.

His eyes were bright.

He was ready to fight – smart/clever as always.

His mind working fast.

But what was abnormally out of character – he was looking to us like his life depended on us. He was looking to us for hope – but then when my and his hope seemed to rise minutes before our times was up.

The warden stormed in and made it very clear to me.

That if I were going to be a problem.

He’d make problems for Julian.

It was a direct threat.

The psychological torture of this brave Australian journalist that chose to publish facts

that we all needed to know for the sake of our children’s future and to save the innocent

is relentless.

So every moment he is in there – he is in danger.

When he is out of our sight he is in danger.

I’m sure he is being punished for every bad word said about that prison.

So I’m taking a big risk here.

To let you know – it is a different set of rules there.

There are no rules. That benefit him.

Remember this.

Then I reminded myself.

That Julian is in his best form

When he is in ‘the fight’.

He is courageous – he rises to every occasion.

And now that the shock has settled in me.

The ridiculous Swedish case dropped – maybe in you too you can see the deadly smear campaign unraveling.

We need to make the people understand.

And – whatever I can do in my power.

I will do.

But with love and kindness and without making enemies.

The petition that was tabled in parliament with hundreds of thousands of signatories grows every minute.

I will continue to speak out.

I will speak to people I don’t share the same opinions with kindly for my heart.

I need to use my natural abilities.

To empower people.

Even powerful people need empowerment.

Be effective.

Be Diplomatic.

I hope you deeply understand that a wonderful Australian man’s life is at stake.

An invaluable mind that all of us need thriving and working.

To help us learn – to stay alive and active in a healthy society.

I’m doing this for my children.

His children.

All of our children.

We need to understand the things that only a few brilliant people

who have done the laborious research, understand.

Or humanity might end in humans hands.

Artificial intelligence is a massive threat.

Maybe more so than climate change.

Why wouldn’t you want Julian who is savvy and aware, on your side?

Australia has the choice to break free from the clutches of America.

Stand strong and brave and do the empowered thing.

Australia would be looked upon especially by young people

as the coolest country in the world.

Of course the people who have done wrong want to shut him up.

He is only a threat to them.

So let’s keep talking to each other.

If I can be of any help.

Please ask me.

I apologize that this message has to come from me.

Lord knows I’d never make it as a politician.

But at least you know – there is no mystery here.

You’ve seen it all.

Literally.

It may be amazing

But to everyone’s surprise I’ve met and have had very productive opportunities speaking with

world leaders about many issues.

YOU have the power – all the power.

And you must be motivated by the people – the people who voted for you.

Don’t forget them/us

Julian.

There are many injustices.

But the solutions can only start when we have true information.

You have an Australian citizen.

That corruption fears because of his intellect.

Don’t let him rot in a cell virtually walking in circles 10 km a day to get exercise

and stay sane.

We are losing him – while he waits for you to do the right thing.

He is not blind – he’s quite cynical actually.

But he has faith in humanity and in you.

While he waits.

Pacing in his organized and passionate head.

In solitary confinement.

Without access to his papers.

His lawyers can’t see him enough.

He has improper access to prepare his case.

No computers etc.

He should be free at least to prepare for his case.

How are they still holding him there.

Believe me when I say.

And I don’t want to – he’s disintegrating rapidly.

Every day he is there he is being slowly killed.

And punished for what?

For being a publisher?

For being too smart?

Exposing war crimes.

We cannot sit idly by – this is about justice.

Don’t turn your back on him.

You can’t.

You just can’t.

Or

When the world goes on into oblivion.

Where some people – very bad people can manipulate the many

to improve the lives of the few.

This will be on you.

In the history books.

What you choose to do will be on record.

And to date it is laughable.

Behind closed doors the world is laughing. ‘Australia doesn’t have the guts.’

But maybe now, you do?

Hopefully now the nation understands the significance of what this all means.

The precedent that will be established, endangering every single Australian that dares publish facts on the web that expose war crimes and systemic corruption.

The formation of the ‘Bring Assange Home Parliamentary Group’

I commend.

It is great leap forward.

Then the great news!

I was advised that the over 220,000 signature strong, ‘Free Julian Assange before it’s too late’ petition that I am also a signatory of – has been tabled in the Australian parliament this month.

These are steps, significant steps that indicate Australians and people of the world understand the significance of this case and are standing en mass to not leave one of their heroes behind.

Standing up as brave and proud people that will not be walked over by their closest allies

to suffice one for a corrupted system that would seek to torture the truth tellers and allow criminals to walk free.

I encourage the Australian government to do as they did to free other filmmakers and journalists that were wrongfully imprisoned on drummed up espionage charges,

like James Ricketson who was freed after Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull made a secret call to Hun Sen on Cambodia.

So what I say to Prime Minister Scott Morrison is don’t do anything special for Julian Assange, just do the same as your party’s predecessor did.

Follow the precedent of previous Prime Ministers doing great things to save their citizens from torture.

Do as you previous leader did for James Ricketson.

Pick up the phone and save an Australian hero.

Pick up the phone and call President Trump and call Prime Minister Johnson and tell them,

to do their part to save the people’s democratic right in the western world and free Julian Assange.

Doing anything other than this is to victimize and treat Julian Assange in a ‘specially’ brutal way.

If Julian Assange is extradited the people will know exactly who paved the way by their inaction, people will know which were the better politicians and which were the corruptly complicit.

Silence is complicity when faced with the onset of tyranny and the destruction of human rights

as this case symbolizes in the highest order.

Join together and free Julian Assange and do what your people demand.

Thank you

Pamela Anderson

By Emma Fiala | Creative Commons | TheMindUnleashed.com