By Darius Shahtahmasebi at theantimedia.org
When it comes to the two front-runners in the current presidential race, the media often attempts to paint Donald Trump as a crazy, unpredictable president who will lead us down a path of terror. However, the truth remains that despite Trump’s overall nonsensical rhetoric, he is the only leading candidate who has said anything sane regarding American foreign policy. Statements to the effect that the Middle East would have been safer with Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi still in power are probably the most profound things ever spoken by the wildly racist billionaire mogul.
Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, voted in favor of the Iraq war in 2003 and was instrumental in bringing about the fall of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya in 2011. She even laughed hysterically about the despot’s death in an interview despite the fact she single-handedly plunged the rich democracy that was Libya into an extremist war zone.
In the eyes of the Russian establishment, this is especially worrying given that it was Clinton who convinced Russia not to use their veto power at the United Nations Security Council level to stop the NATO onslaught of Libya; she promised the so-called “no-fly zone” would not be used to pursue regime change.
Russian President Vladimir Putin was very critical of NATO motives when it became clear that NATO forces had, indeed, designated Gaddafi a military target, asking the important and necessary question: “Who gave NATO the right to kill Gaddafi?” After Gaddafi was murdered on the streets of Sirte, Putin astutely stated:
“The whole world saw him being killed; all bloodied. Is that democracy? And who did it? Drones, including American ones, delivered a strike on his motorcade. Then commandos – who were not supposed to be there – brought in so-called opposition and militants and killed him without trial. I’m not saying that Gaddafi didn’t have to quit, but that should have been left up to the people of Libya to decide through the democratic process.”
Clearly, Russia was very disappointed that the so-called no-fly zone in Libya had been used to undermine the international legal process and overthrow the leader of a sovereign nation — something they could have prevented at the Security Council level with the use of their veto power had Hillary not convinced them otherwise. Clinton’s subsequent laughter at this flagrant violation of international law is a slap in the face to the Russian establishment that continues to advocate for a stronger working relationship with the United States and a return to classical international law. Russia, therefore, likely views Clinton not only as a mentally unstable candidate but one who could be the president to drown all other presidents in history by finally pulling the trigger on Russia.
According to Clinton Ehrlich, the sole Western researcher at the Russian Foreign Ministry’s Moscow State Institute of International Relations:
“Moscow perceives the former secretary of state as an existential threat. The Russian foreign-policy experts I consulted did not harbor even grudging respect for Clinton.”
Whereas Trump has paid the Russian president compliments and claimed he would work more closely with Russia, Clinton has continued her policy of beratement and hostility towards Putin. Just last month, she called him the “godfather of right-wing, extreme nationalism.” As Foreign Policy magazine pointed out, this was an attempt to insult Putin using his own words.
Clinton further derided Donald Trump’s praise of Putin as “unpatriotic” and “scary,” claiming Trump’s attempted coziness with Putin could represent a threat to American national security. Apparently, America always needs Russia to remain an enemy. If this is the case, when exactly does the Cold War officially end? Under Clinton, it never will.
Russia’s distrust of Clinton runs further than merely televised mind-numbing entertainment. Russia is well aware ofClinton’s ambitions to turn Syria, one of Russia’s most strategic allies in the Middle East, into the next Libya. Putin has therefore been actively working to counter these endeavors through direct military intervention in Syria.
How far Clinton will go down this road is frighteningly unclear given that under the current president, the United States Air Force just shelled the Syrian army, which was engaged in a battle with ISIS at the time. The U.S. strike killed over 60 Syrian servicemen and wounded 100 more. If Obama, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize that he is, is essentially providing air cover for ISIS, what on earth will Hillary Clinton attempt in Syria?
Given Russia’s vested interest in ensuring the next president of the United States is not a potentially unstable career warmonger, there could be some truth behind claims of Russian interference in American politics.
If so, could you blame them for trying?
This article (Russia Views Hillary Clinton as An “Existential Threat” to Peace) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Darius Shahtahmasebi and theAntiMedia.org.
Unrelated communications effort:
Subject to records available in henry ford wyandotte database.
febuary-april 2016
To procreate the rythm of the synchronized results world-wide of an organically grown plant vs. The genitically altered plant and the effect of the growing process on its resources, then following through with the viability of perhaps… an apple trees fruit and its nutrients in humans just for example… i feel set into motion the literal standard our lifeform would suit for regulation. And another example is a personal expierence being that i have had a psyciatrist perscribe me 4 medications at once that interacted as it would follow to fuck me up being the formulation my body currently was. My right ventrical was swelling as result, so they tried to put me on blood presure medication while the anatomy of my heart was in a condition that toxic substance would neglect. Rather than giving me a detox and maybe even considering a vitamin deficiency as cause for the irregular brain chemistry in my body due to the diet they were providint being insufficent for me. I had no amino acids, no fresh fruit or vegetables, and no natural protein and i am a vegan. The very first thing a psyciatrist should have legally been able to do is get me a fucking nutritionalist, if all of our bodies have been regulated by physicians to be sustained by only the intake of our mouths anyway. Led me straight to the process: each patient was expierencing malnutrition in a facility that was not clean and had chemicals that may cause allergic reactions in the uncirculated air 24/7 during the stay. Meanwhile, their bodies were being seen as unfit to create proper psychological function so they were perscribed medications to alter the functions. No assesment of their normal life outside of institutilazion was a part of any patients care, i asked in group therapy. Whenever i had a line of people at the desk creating altercations with the staff, they would hold me down and inject me with extra medications on suprise doses that were approve by a doctor on sight. They also disregarded my wheesing, fainting, and puking up blood the entire time because they said the medicaions yeilded a peroid ths my body should ajust to them. So should i be eligible for a malpractice lawsuit if they were at random without perscription altering the state of my bodys reactions to the chemicals with their reasoning being “the patient was hyperverbal” (which is marked in the chart) if in fact a side effect may be an altered state of mind that i should be ajusting to??
Im not alone in that exact same physical aspect either. It was like the fucking human centipede of malpractice.
Face facts people. Hillary Clinton is not capable of forming her own opinions.
She is a drugged up drone, Who repeats what her masters tell her to repeat.
There is no critical thinking going on here.
The Rothschild’s want war with Russia so they can steal their resources, Because America is running out. You don’t even have to be reasonably intelligent to figure this out just open your eyes. America doesn’t understand that you could never take over Russia because of its sheer land mass. Clinton is going to cause World War 3 and your children will suffer for HUNDREDS of years so the rich can get richer.
I BEG you all, Including the police and military, DEFEND YOURSELVES BEFORE ITS TOO LATE.
You are more than happy to travel across the world and kill for Freedom so why don’t you start with your own tyrannical government?
Excellent article, spot on.
hillary is the USAs ISIS. No doubt. People will die.