In yet another sign that our politicians and their respective “allies” in Ukraine no longer care about the rule of law, so long as it benefits Western interests, a kangaroo court has ruled that the Odessa Massacre was an accident. To those of you who are unfamiliar with the tragedy, it was an event that had sparked the drawn-out civil war that is currently roiling in Ukraine:
A shooting was reported, and the unidentified masked assailant was immediately deemed a Russian sympathizer. This was despite the fact that he and his crew would later be video-taped consulting with the police, and really does ONE unidentified shooter who is seen firing into the air justify the wanton massacre of DOZENS?
The mob of pro-West Ukrainians immediately used this as an excuse to turn on a protest that was being staged nearby, by Ukrainians who were unhappy with their democratically-elected leader getting ousted in the coup. The protesters fled into a building nearby, after being pelted by rocks and shot at by gun-wielding members of the pro-West.
Video evidence of these pro-West radicals shows them preparing molatovs, and pelting the building with these. They chant slogans as the building burns, and shoot at the people inside. A pregnant woman was among those who had died. She was strangled by the radicals before they set the building alight. Below is a video I had edited, including footage of these scenes and the UT report that had dared call the innocents, including the pregnant woman, “militants”:
UT is a vicious channel. You will find this other video by StormCloudsGathering particularly instructive of this horrible tragedy:
I am disgusted that this incident was ruled accidental, considering the fact that the pro-West mob had filmed their own activities as they proceeded to execute their opposition. Many survivors of the fire were even strangled. It is troubling that no mainstream media reports this matter, and that I had to glean information of this ruling from UT…. Which itself had only featured the story because it had foolishly believed that this ruling was a sign that the deaths of at least 40 innocents was justified… I pray that nobody sane shares that view.
You want to support Anonymous Independent & Investigative News? Please, follow us on Twitter: Follow @AnonymousNewsHQ
