Australian Prime Minister’s Chief Business Adviser warned about Climate Change Sham and New World Order

Climate change is undeniable, according to the bulk of media outlets, experts, and politicians; but to what extent is still open to debate. However contentious this subject is, those from impressive backgrounds continue to question the political agenda and manipulation from behind the scenes. It’s not that they’re out to debunk climate change, but to offer independent and rational coverage of an otherwise politicalization of our sciences.

One such man, Professor Séralini, did such a thing, where he conducted research on rats eating GMO maize for a period of ninety days. Over the trial, evidence presented that Monsanto’s GMO’s were extremely harmful to the animal’s health. His study, originally published in the Journal of Food and Chemical Toxicology was quickly retracted under what now can be considered Monsanto duress, after a former Monsanto employee was appointed as editor of the journal.

An unbiased and independent approach to scientific research is imperative to the progression of scientific breakthroughs. But like the GMO- Séralini rollout (Séralini has since won lawsuits against those tarnishing his reputation), the politicization of climate change risks mockery of the genuine debate.

Professor Lennart Bengtsson, a Swedish climatologist, along with four other leading world climate scientists recently had their research rejected. Their research suggested that the climate may not be as sensitive to greenhouse gases as the IPCC may have you believe. “It is an indication of how science is gradually being influenced by political views. The reality hasn’t been keeping up with the [computer] models,” he stated.

Politicization of the climate debate

The United States have aggressively pursued foreign policy in food and agriculture, and now climate change, but they’re not alone in their lobbying. Australia has joined the hubbub on the climate debate, front lining the talks at the Paris Climate Conference this December, and arguably, overcommitting themselves.

With the eviction of PM Tony Abbott in a leadership spill, new Australian PM Malcom Turnbull has his political itinerary mapped on the climate change horizons. On polar caps with Abbott, and Abbott’s chief business adviser, Maurice Newman, Turnbull has committed Australia to a $1billion central positon of action.

Rewind to May 2015, and it was Newman whose speech gave rise to the politicization of the climate debate. His statement, which coincided with a visit from the UN’s top climate mediator, Christiana Figueres. Newman accused the UN of using false models to represent sustained temperature increases, claiming the intention was to end capitalism and democracy for an authoritarian rule.

“It’s a well-kept secret, but 95 percent of the climate models we are told prove the link between human CO2 emissions and catastrophic global warming have been found, after nearly two decades of temperature stasis, to be in error,” he wrote in an opinion piece. “The real agenda is concentrated political authority. Global warming is the hook,” he said, “[creating] a new world order.” Figueres is, according to Newman, “on record saying democracy is a poor political system for fighting global warming. Communist China, she says, is the best model.”

Figueres was in Australia to urge Australia to entertain a leading role at the climate summit in Paris in December. As the politicization progressed, Abbott grew as an unlikely participant. Backing his 2009 declaration that the science behind climate change is “crap”, and warning in 2015 that the Paris summit would fail if economic growth was prioritized below carbon emission cuts, Abbott’s position was steadfast in critiquing what others held as gospel. He repealed the carbon pricing tax, and abolished the Climate Commission advisory body in Australia; perhaps partially sealing Abbott’s fate months later: Turnbull took the helm, by force.

Regardless of the politics, if the UN predictions suggesting a 4.8° Celsius hike within the century are correct, we’ll have more to worry about than Parliament’s debate.

This Article (Australian Prime Minister’s Chief Business Adviser warned about Climate Change Sham and New World Order) is a free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and AnonHQ.com.