5 Countries That Prove the World Doesn’t Need Fossil Fuels


Written by True Activist


A decade ago, the renewable energy movement faced an uphill battle. Today, environmentally-minded nations of the world increasingly embrace alternative energy sources. These countries now lead the way toward a future free of petroleum and dirty energy. In the process, they save significant amounts of money on national energy costs while preserving and protecting the world’s natural resources.

Despite powerful corporate disinformation campaigns meant to convince populations that renewable energy is not a viable way to satisfy the needs of global industry, the following five nations aren’t just subsisting on renewable energy—they are thriving on it.

Costa Rica

Since the start of 2015, Costa Rica has gone 100% green. This move away from fossil fuels will help ensure that lush jungles and pristine beaches remain intact. The comprehensive shift will help Costa Ricans not only save their natural resources, but ensure that the country continues to benefit from its very profitable eco-tourism industry, though they would be wise to be vigilant of the effects of tourism on local ecosystems.

One of Costa Rica’s renewable efforts involves utilizing its own plentiful rainfall to power their growing hydroelectric infrastructure. Incredibly, the small country has the second best electric infrastructure in Latin America. Yet, it has not put all its eggs in one basket—Costa Rica is also generating power from geothermal sources, wind, biomass and solar energy products.


Denmark knows a thing or two about windmills, which have peppered their countryside for decades. In fact, the nation installed its first wind turbines as far back as the 1970s and has not let up in recent years. Denmark is now the leading country in the world for wind power. In the year 2014, Denmark set a world record for windmill production. The country now enjoys around 40% of its total electricity from this one clean energy source, alone.

New studies show that Denmark is well on its way to meeting its self-set goal of being 50% powered by renewable resources by 2020. Not happy with half, Denmark hopes to be 100% renewable by 2050. This would make it one of the first advanced countries in the word to be 100% renewable. It’s an ambitious goal, but Denmark’s recent success proves they are up to the task. Just this month, the nation celebrated a day in which it drew 140% of its electrical power from wind turbines.


2014 was a very good year for Scotland and renewables. In one month of December 2014, Scotland set a personal record in renewable energy. Using wind power alone, Scotland provided almost 1300 MWh (megawatt-hours) to its growing national grid. That’s enough energy to supply almost 4 million homes with electricity.

Scotland is now using wind power to produce and supply almost 100% of the country’s household needs, but it has not stopped there. During the summer months, Aberdeen, Edinburgh, Glasgow, and Inverness harvested enough solar energy to power 100% or more of the electric demands for the average home.

Scotland has also invested large amounts of money into creating one of the most advanced computer-driven energy infrastructures in the world.


Sweden is joining its Nordic neighbor, Denmark, and doubling down on green with a limited-coal approach that has been so successful the IEA, or International Energy Agency, commended the country for its new energy policies. But Sweden is not content relying on limited coal alone—the country is also developing advanced biomass energy systems. The strategy has been so successful that by 2010, Sweden was already producing more energy from biomass than from fossil fuels. Steps like these are putting Sweden high on the list of green countries.


It seems like Finland is not happy playing second fiddle to its northern neighbors. Wind powered energy is quickly transforming the country’s energy needs. These recent steps have dramatically reduced the country’s greenhouse gas emissions, caused from the burning of fossil fuels.

Finland is not as far along as Sweden and Denmark when it comes to renewable energy, but it is quickly moving in the right direction. By the year 2012,  was already producing enough energy to cover almost 34.3% of the energy needs and by 2020, it hopes to be closer to 40%. With its neighbors leading the way, the future looks bright for Finland.


Get Your Anonymous T-Shirt / Sweatshirt / Hoodie / Tanktop, Smartphone or Tablet Cover or Mug In Our Spreadshirt ShopClick Here



Get Your Anonymous T-Shirt / Sweatshirt / Hoodie / Tanktop, Smartphone or Tablet Cover or Mug In Our Spreadshirt Shop! Click Here



    • You didn’t come up with the windmill. you were just the first to use it comprehensively to pump out your reclaimed wetlands.

    • These are only examples. Nothing was said that implied that these were the only countries, or even the top countries in renewable resources.

  1. So as of 2013 the total population of all 5 countries mentioned is just under 31 million people, roughly 1/10 of the USA population. Texas alone has 27 million people. Not to mention all the above mentioned countries have great infrastructure and public transportation. It is not like the states where the majority of the country has to commute via car/truck. So really this isn’t comparable to the USA in any way shape or form. Apples to Oranges.

    • Correct — apples to oranges. I live in Europe now, so I know a thing or two about their society. Besides the huge increase in use of renewables, they have laws limiting where you can live, which concentrates the population into cities and towns, preserving the land for farming and nature. They also tax all propety sales at 19%, plus charge about $2000 for a drivers’ license, and about $1000 a year for car registration, which makes most folks use mass trans and bicycles for transportion (plus, because of the above, they live close to work). If we did the same, it would be apples to apples.

  2. Anonymous, How does the size of the country matter to the implementation of renewables. If a country says we will spend a fixed portion of GDP on renewables, how is it different for another country if it decides to do the same. Other countries in Europe have decided to invest in infrastructure and public transport. US not so much. Whose fault is that? I don’t think you make a strong case for inaction.

  3. And Finland has one nuclear plant on the way, and a second one after they find enough money from investors. Also not so cool when the “renewable” energy mostly turf. As a Finn I would consider finland a bad example of the energy reforms going on in the world.

  4. Oh so how do you think those windmills and hydroelectric machines are lubricated? Gasp,could it be oil? How do you think they are made? Gasp, machines run by oil? Do they not import tv, iPhones, blue ray players, computers, bottled cokes, cars, machinery, solar panels and many more? All made by fossil fuels. So technically those 5 countries and many more DO still need fossil fuels. Dumbasses.

    • How–ignorant. Even my car runs on synthetic oil and plastics can be made out of hemp so– no–we do NOT still need fossil fuels.

  5. What about France? 80% of their energy is produced by nuclear plants. State-of-the-art nuclear technology is actually way more sustainable in the long run than anything else.

  6. Why is Iceland always overlooked? The only power they generate is from geothermal and hydroelectric plants. They do import some energy, but they’re well on their way to being totally green.

  7. Russia is only preparing for war because the USA is forcing it on them by tring to take over the whole Middle East !!! I thought you anonymous goofs were supposed to be “aware”.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here