Home Blog Page 2130

‘Cannibal Cop’ Released!

4

Written by: Eight

 

The alleged  ‘Cannibal Cop’ was released from the Metropolitan Correctional Center, after serving time for a crime he did not commit.

gilberto-valle

Gilberto Valle, a 30 year old former NYPD officer was arrested in 2012, as his ex-wife Kathleen Mangan found disturbing images and conversations Valle had in a fetish website called DarkFetishNet.com.

 

Valle shared sinister conversations with a man, where he expressed his so called

‘cannibal fetish’. Valle said “[he] want[ed] her to experience being cooked alive…” (Beekman and Gregorian, 2014) as well as saying “She’ll be trussed up like a turkey … terrified, screaming and crying.” (Ibid)

 

“The men even discussed basting a woman in olive oil and then cooking her over an open fire.”

 

(Beekman and Gregorian, 2014)

 

 

In addition, Valle illegally accessed the law enforcement database, searching for who were believed to be potential victims. As well as searching for torture based instruments online. This lead Prosecutors to think he went too far, and agreeing with Valle’s arrest, due to the fact that he could be a potential threat to the community, as they wanted “to ensure the safety of the community and the target victims.” (Beekman and Gregorian, 2014) Even though there was no hard evidence to prove he actually committed a crime, he illegally accessed the NYPD database for personal use.

 

Consequently, the jury convicted him in 2013 for plotting to kidnap, kill and eat women.

 

On appeal, in what was described as a  “courageous decision” made by Judge Gardephe, who held that there was insufficient evidence for his conviction in 2012 and thus released him on a bail with conditions including a $100,000 bond, home detention, deprivation of computers, attending a health treatment as well as staying away from the potential victims.

 

Furthermore, Garderphe stated that Valle did not take any ‘real-life’ step to kidnapping anyone, but merely fantasized about it on the Internet. Therefore, “the judge upheld Valle’s conviction on a charge of using the law enforcement database illegally. The count carries a maximum sentence of one year in prison and Valle has yet to be sentenced for the crime, but he’s already served more than a year of hard time.” (Beekman and Gregorian, 2014)

 

Valle’s defense lawyer Julia Gatto responded by saying:

“Gil Valle is innocent of any conspiracy. Gil is guilty of nothing more than having unconventional thoughts. But we don’t convict people, take away their liberty and imprison them for their thoughts” (Beekman and Gregorian, 2014) as well as expressing her relief towards Garderphe’s decision, for “upholding the awesome and fundamental legal principles at stake here, including our core freedom to be able to think what we want free of government intrusion.” (Ibid)

 

The Manhattan Federal Court released Valle on Tuesday, 1st July 2014, (Weiser, 2014) under his mother’s custody, after serving 21 months of time at the Metropolitan Correctional Center.

“The judge’s well-reasoned decision validates what we have said since the beginning: There was no crime”

– Julia Gatto

 

(Beekman and Gregorian, 2014)

 

His mother, Elizabeth Valle expressed her happiness, by saying that her prayers had been heard, as well as saying that “He’s not the monster they portray him to be,” (Beekman and Gregorian, 2014) and that “the only thing he’s guilty of is being stupid enough to be on that website.” (Ibid) His mother also said that she regained faith on the “criminal justice system” (ibid), due to the judge’s decision on the appeal.

 

In addition, Gilberto Valle said he “… want[ed] to take the opportunity to apologize to everyone who’s been hurt, shocked and offended by [his] infantile actions”. (Beekman and Gregorian, 2014), not to mention that he expressed his love for his inmates, and said he would never forget them.

 

Furthermore, Gatto refused to comment on Valle’s family matters, as there have been inquiries regarding his ambiguous reemployment status and as to whether he will be able to see his six-year-old daughter again or not.

 

The Prosecution, however, is appealing Valle’s acquittal and he could face life imprisonment if the appeal would be allowed. Although, Julia Gatto is not concerned as she says there is insufficient evidence for the verdict to be reinstated. Nonetheless, Valle declared he regrets what he has done, and that  “[he] just want[s] to go home and spend some time with [his] family,” (Beekman and Gregorian, 2014) in his mother’s house in Queens. In addition to eating homemade Spanish dishes, and playing with his dog, as a way to celebrate his freedom.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

References:

Beekman, D. and Gregorian, D. (2014). ‘Cannibal cop’ released into custody of his mother after conviction overturned in stunning reversal. New York Daily News. [online] Available at: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/conviction-cannibal-nypd-overturned-article-1.1850334 [Accessed 16 Nov. 2014].

 

Weiser, B. (2014). Ruling in Cannibal Case Revives Debate Over When a Fantasy Crosses a Criminal Line. The New York Times. [online] Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/02/nyregion/officer-gilberto-valle-freed-after-conviction-overturned-in-cannibal-case.html?_r=0 [Accessed 22 Nov. 2014].

Anonymous #OpSoaringEagle: Ottawa Police in Debauched Investigation

14

In May, 2014, a 16 year-old boy was arrested for allegedly using his computer to fake emergency calls to create terror hoaxes. The arrest was based on the IP address supplied to local law enforcement from the FBI, and acted upon by the detective in charge of the case, Officer Joel Demore, of the Ottawa Police services.

The youth was charged with 60 offences on the basis of the IP address being his, including public mischief, conveying false information and more alarmingly, death threats. However, it has been recognized by hacker @AerithXOR that these charges are unfounded, as IP addresses can be faked, and that the father of the teenager charged is said to have evidence that the computer was in fact hacked.

hackers

Supported by Anonymous, operation Soaring Eagle (#OpSoaringEagle) was commenced two weeks ago, with the Ottawa Police being the main target. The department was warned that communications on the internet, domains and servers will be hijacked as a response to the debauched investigation of the 16 year-old boy.

@AerithXOR has also taken the credit for shutting down the Ottawa Police mail server, gaining access to incoming and outgoing logs, and was working on shutting down the Supreme Court of Canada’s website. His main claim was that Officer Demore acted upon the given IP address without conducting any further investigation to see if the computer had been compromised by external forces. [1]

 

[1] Waqas.(2014, November 24). Anonymous targets Canadian City, Police, Supreme Court against teen’s arrest. Retrieved from http://hackread.com/anonymous-opsoaringeagle-against-youth-arrest/

Why Film the Police?

5

In light of the recent shooting of 12 year old, Tamir Rice, amongst a series of other questionable police actions, you are well within your rights to film the police. Documenting their actions will not only offer some protection for yourself and those on the receiving end, but it will also offer an objective viewpoint if a day in court is ever presented. You can’t argue against footage presented in real time.

Police can be held accountable for the actions, just as the ordinary citizen. The misconception that it is illegal to film police is false. Anything on a location open to the public is legal. But be aware, documenting the audio in these situations can lead to charges against you for “wiretapping.” It’s in most legislations, so be sure to inform the party clearly, that they are being taped. This may also de-escalate a heated situation to your benefit.

Footage was submitted to the Free Thought Project recently, in Texas, to highlight the importance of knowing your rights and being prepared to film the police. In the video, a police officer is captured saying to a young man, “What are you going to do if I violate his rights?” It is at this point he sees the cameras on him and returns to his car.

Screenshot (4) copy

The question then arises, what would have happened without the imposition of the cameras on this police officer? Eventually the situation was resolved and the officers eventually released the young man involved.

 

 

Related links: JUSTICE DEPARTMENT URGES MARYLAND COURT TO UPHOLD CITIZENS’ RIGHT TO FILM POLICE

 

 

Black Friday And Cyber Monday Scams To Watch Out For

1

It’s coming up to Christmas. We’re all too aware of what that means: spending money and spending a lot of it online. Unfortunately for us, it isn’t just the mark of the Christmas season. It’s also the mark of the scammer season for cyber criminals.

The two busiest shopping days are fast approaching. The 28th November (Black Friday), and 1st December (Cyber Monday). These two days will see millions of dollars poured into consumerism, online and at retailers, making it a massive target for data breaches. Last year alone, saw millions of Credit and Debit cards stolen, and along with them, personal information.

identity-theft-online-fraud

But not all is lost in the spirit of Christmas. You can protect yourselves by being aware of some of the scams going around online.

1.  Copycat Websites/Fake Websites. These are all too common throughout the year, but as the retail industry is set for the chaos of Christmas, these websites can pop up everywhere to promise you the best deals one can find. Be sure to double check the links, the addresses and logos for anything amiss. It may be as little as one single letter missing from a name we recognize everywhere and never think twice about. For example, amazan.com rather than amazon.com.

2.  Phishing Websites. These are seen in the form of email messages which are fraudulent. Always abide by the rule “if in doubt, don’t”, and never, never give any personal information away online unless you are 110 percent certain that it is trustworthy, ie. Something you have used in the past. Saying this, those portraying trustworthy sites have become incredibly sophisticated over the years.

3.  Fake Advertisements and Coupons. If the source is unknown or suspicious to you, chances are it’s too good to be true. This can be said for ads that purport the great deals of a lifetime. Keep your antivirus and malwares software up-to-date in case of an accidental click on the ‘click-bait’ links.

online_fraud

4.  The Unexpected Gift. Would you accept an unexpected gift off a suspicious looking stranger in the subway? No. Then why accept the same gift online? These scams usually come in the form of some type of coupon reward where you are expected first to fill out information that inevitably gives away your personal details. A common ‘unwanted gift’ comes in the form of an attachment via your email.

5.  Beware of package notices. When shipping out that special something to the special someone, or maybe it’s a gift for yourself, beware of the shipping policy which asks for your personal information to check your package. You know you can trust FedEx, but beware the link that sends you to another site. Enter the tracking number yourself.

Don’t let convenience get in the way of intelligence. Shop smart.

Anonymous recommends: 

Protect your PC and mobile devices from hackers & governments and surf anonymously 

 

Shocking Mistake in Darren Wilson Grand Jury

63

A broadcast conducted by Lawrence O’Donnell has highlighted the laws that assisted in Darren Wilson’s success against the courts. Just before Wilson testified against his indictment that he shot and killed Michael Brown in cold blood, a statute was handed out to the Grand Jury by Assistant District Attorney Kathy Alizadeh.

The copy of the statute that was handed out to the jury was of a 1979 Missouri Law that had been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1985. As she proceeded to hand out the copy she said “I’m going to pass out to you all, you all are going to receive a copy of a statute. It is section 563.046, and it is, it says law enforcement officers use of force in making an arrest, and it is the law on what is permissible, what force is permissible and when in making an arrest by a police officer.”

What she handed the jury was something that “had not been law in Missouri during her entre legal career,” according to O’Donnell. He continues to highlight how she was telling the Grand Jury “…that it is legal to shoot fleeing suspects simply because they are fleeing…she was making it impossible for Darren Wilson to fail in front of this Grand Jury.”

The portion that was ruled unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court, says that a police officer is “…justified in the use of such physical force as he or she reasonably believes is immediately necessary to effect the arrest or to prevent the escape from custody.”

In the announcement, O’Donnell makes a valid point that the case of Darren Wilson vs Michael Brown is “…one of the most important cases of police use of deadly force since 1985.”

You can view the full debate by Lawrence O’Donnell below.

Screenshot (7) copy

Related Links: Why The People In Ferguson Protested

___________________________________________________________________________________

Sources: http://www.msnbc.com/the-last-word/watch/shocking-mistake-in-darren-wilson-grand-jury-364273731666