Stunning Discoveries Have Scientists Confirming the Existence of God

There is scientific evidence supporting the universe was created by an intelligence — and, for the first time, science has proof that the universe was created out of nothing.


Can science — which approves reason and evidence, and denounces faith and religion — really prove or disprove the existence of God? Can highly respected scientists — long perceived as the champions of atheism — change their mind? Can the creator of universe be caught on video? Well, there is scientific evidence that the universe was created by an intelligence — and, for the first time, science has proof that the universe was created out of nothing.

In 2004, English philosopher and the world’s most famous atheist Antony Flew did a volte-face to conclude that some sort of intelligence must have created the universe. In short, based on scientific evidence, he proved the existence of God. In a video title Has Science Discovered God?, Flew said:

“I’m thinking of a God very different from the God of the Christian and far and away from the God of Islam, because both are depicted as omnipotent Oriental despots, cosmic Saddam Husseins. It could be a person in the sense of a being that has intelligence and a purpose, I suppose. Research into DNA had shown, by the almost unbelievable complexity of the arrangements which are needed to produce life, that intelligence must have been involved.”

A decade later, Israeli scientist Gerald Schroeder, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology graduate with over thirty years of experience in research and teaching, claimed science has proven the existence of God as described in Genesis. In a five-minute video, Schroeder proved that the universe was created out of nothing by a “force of nature” described almost exactly as the God of Genesis in the Bible.

Then in 2015, an image captured by specialist NASA telescopes sparked speculation that God had been discovered 17,000 light years away. The Sunday Express reported:

“The space agency’s Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array — or NuSTAR — was aimed at a pulsar (or neutron star) called PSR B1509-58 a staggering distance from earth. What they were sent back was a spectral vision of an outstretched hand — which has become known as the Hand of God. The ‘hand’ is believed to be the remnants of the star which went supernova and ejected an enormous cloud of material – leaving pulsar PSR B1509-58 in its wake. The remnant cloud when viewed via high-energy X-rays shows up as a green, red and blue hand, a staggering 175 light years across.”

existence of godRecently, Michio Kaku, theoretical physicist at the City College of New York and known as one of the developers of the revolutionary String Theory that describes how all particles are actually vibrating strings, and how these strings propagate through space and interact with each other, found evidence of a Higher Being, which he described as the action of a force “that governs everything”.

“I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence. Believe me, everything that we call chance today won’t make sense anymore. To me it is clear that we exist in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance. The final solution resolution could be that God is a mathematician. The mind of God, we believe, is cosmic music, the music of strings resonating through 11-dimensional hyperspace.”

Can science really offer evidence and establish that God exists? Here is a video showing a few scientific insights that indeed point to the existence of God…

This article (Stunning Discoveries Have Scientists Confirming the Existence of God) is a free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and

 Supporting Anonymous’ Independent & Investigative News is important to us. Please, follow us on Twitter: Follow @AnonymousNewsHQ


Get Your Anonymous T-Shirt / Sweatshirt / Hoodie / Tanktop, Smartphone or Tablet Cover or Mug In Our Spreadshirt Shop! Click Here



  1. Fuktards. Where does one begin to explain the simplicity of existence to fucking chimps. Who created God? Answer that question or shut your cunthole mouths!!!

    • @Mike i might ask you the same question, what makes the egg? you properly give me the answer that is the hen, then what makes the hen?

      • God is[ being itself] the The, all,ah, I am who IS, being itself, underived. All else is conditional derived being, conditioned on the un conditional real essential being, god is, I am, All ,ah; the one who is[ essential being]

      • @Alfy What happens is you ask what makes the egg and I educate you that it’s not a question of the hen or the egg, it’s more about the fish or the egg.
        Now we get to the same regress with God that we would with anything else. The thing is: if a God can be eternal, why can’t the universe?

        • according to some, the Universe (or multiverse, there is ample ground here) was created so that God could experience himself. you see, before the universe God knew all that was to be known conceptually, including himself, but had no experience of it. God created the universe so that he could experience the concepts and keep evolving. So, while God is (or could be)eternal, his experiencing of it may not be necessarily eternal, because while one may understand the concept of END, one must also experience it to know it.

    • Maybe “God”, of course not the anthropomorphized Biblical “God”, created itself through some sort of cyclical evolution of some sort. Existence itself is a cycle. Of course, some will ask “well what started that cycle?”. Reasonably expecting that one can’t answer that it will be used to unreasonably validate their POV/belief/ideology, therefore closing their minds all the while purporting themselves to be open minded. Science was meant to answer questions, not to validate ones narrative of belief/ideology. To which new atheism has done exactly that, making itself a new infallible religion.

    • He was born from his devine father and mother as we are born from him and his wife. His divine father and mother also had devine fathers and mothers and so on for Infinium for there is no end or begining. Just as we are, god and his wife once was and through the atonement they were provided, they became without sin or flaw. We all have the potential to become gods and goddesses as we are spiritual children of are heavenly father and mother. We choose here and now in this world that will ultimately shape what happens in the afterlife. Not every one will be heavenly fathers and mothers combaribly to people on this earth who choose not to have family’s. As for the science portion we should never stop asking if or why because it is are duty to learn from this world for are biological children to have richer lives. We all believe we can learn from are mistakes. Science answers what things are and how they work. Religion answers why and how those things are there.

      • Also I would like to further state I am skeptic on the hand part of this page. It can easily be proven wrong and though is certainly interesting seems to be lining up more with are biological pattern recognition rather then Scripture from any religion except speketi monster and new ones that may be forming around this “God’s hand”. Not that I detest those or those not of my Mormon religion. I really love that people care enough about each other to provide hope through whatever means they can. It is sad to me though that just as technology can be abused so has religious propaganda. Muslims today and Christians in the past killing and doing horrible things just as we have abused nukes and chemiucle warfare. If you need to ask why god would let us suffer I will provide you with this link.

  2. This must be click bait. This is NOT what Kaku meant when talking about the God Particle. Trying to extrapolate this into some sort of scientific consensus is misleading at best. Incredibly complex things can emerge from very simple circumstances, especially given enough time (billions of years at this point in time). You’d be better off looking at Chaos Theory and Time Relativity to explain why incredibly complex systems *appear* to be created by an intelligence, but then you’d be bordering on the absurdity of Intelligent Design.

    • Exactly. Michio Kaku is a pantheist. Not a theist or a deist or a creationist. Same is true for Einstein whom he talks about. What Kaku is explaining in the video has nothing to do with there being a personal creator deity or not.

      In the case of the Israeli scientist Gerald Schroeder video, we have here a case of confirmation bias. To give just one example he says that there was something or someone predating the universe. How can something pre-date the universe if time didn’t even exist yet? Exactly… it can’t.

      Creationists just change the science so it will fit their narrative.

      • I agree. The physical universe can’t come out of nothing and any beginning is an illusion. There is a cause, and perhaps at best, a universe without space or time.

        If we imagine gravity, such as that of the Earth, as an attractive force one body exerts on all other bodies(and, as they say ‘spacetime’ itself), then we would give this the shape resembling a sphere in the 3-dimensional model of space. Something like an hour glass may represent the interactions between two bodies in 3 dimensions. Well, there are now functions which can describe relationships of incredible sophistication relative to just a mere sphere, and there is no reason to not, at least, imagine why reality could not be shaped by a combination of these functions.

        Right now, science is using math to make a narrative in the exact way religion is attempting to use science to make a narrative. It is not a bad approach as it keeps things very intuitive. Luckily, many of these scientists are mathematicians and are aware that the physical interpretation is likely a convenience.

        If the universe has a source, nothing or indiscernible to the world as we know it, then I ‘feel’ like this source is likely to be wholly connected to every part.

        • I think that is a very reasonable assumption, and I think this kind of secular reasoning together with other ideas which have been collectivised under the umbrella term pantheism (God is Nature) may become a very strong and positive force in the future as opposed to monotheistic patriarchical religions for example, or even in comparison with various kinds of atheism which aren’t open to the idea of any kind of divinity at all.

          To be here and to be conscious of ourselves, and to be able to recognize the beauty, perfection and even imperfection in nature and ourselves, is a miracle in its own right, even though when I say miracle, I’m obviously not referring to the non-natural religious definition of miracle. There is no need to invent a supernatural (above and beyond nature) God to explain the creation nor the existence of the Universe.

          When a volcano erupted we used to think that it was Vulcan, God of fire and volcanos fanning the flames of his forge beneath the earth. During thunderstorms we used to think that it was Thor smashing his hammer above the clouds to make it thunder. Almost everytime we didn’t understand something someone just made a satisfying explanation by attributing it to some supernatural God, Goddess or event. However, from erupting volcanos to thundering clouds it has all been explained by science and has all been rightfully attributed to natural causes. And right now, with articles as the above, people still seem to be falling for the same trick. Is our tribalistic nature so strong that we just keep falling for it time and time again, by the same people and the same organizations, who have told us for hundreds of years with each scientific discovery which disproved their wild supernatural claims that in this particular case we might have been wrong about it, but over there is something we don’t understand still, that definitely has to be due to our God or in confirmation with our doctrine. What else but tribalism makes people believe in the same sort of lies over and over again? If you walk outside and you find somebody keyed your car what is more likely? Will you go to the police to in the hope to find some justice against the perpetrator? And will you contact your insurance company to receive your compensation for the damage of your car? Or will you decide that neither of those things would change much because your tinfoil hat wearing neighbor told you she saw the archangel Michael decending from heaven and upon landing he accidentally scratched your car with his fiery sword, and angels can’t be sued after all? Then why if you don’t believe your neighbor (which is at least more likely the case if you have at least a little sanity left), does someone still believe their priest, or rabbi or imam when they tell us similar stories? Why when deciding who or what created the Universe do people not apply the same reasoning they use when trying to discover who or what scratched their car?

          By observing nature we have learned that one of its inherent qualities is that it creates. Even when it destroys it either creates something new or it makes place for something new to be created. Without evidence of something or someone above and beyond nature which or who creates what reason is there to believe in such a thing or being? Both religious people (in particular the Abrahamic religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam who see us as the epitome of creation and nature as having been created for us to use and abuse) and some atheists seem to ignore the only divinity we have proof of completely when they either invent a creator and make up miracles while ignoring the miracle which is happening right before our eyes (which is nature), or in the case of close minded atheists when with eyes wide shut they cease to wonder, if they’ve ever wondered.

          Visita Interiora Terrae Rectificando Invenies Occultum Lapidem or visit the interior of the earth and by rectification you will find the hidden stone. As the divine is within nature, and we are nature, the best place we can start looking in search of the divine, and to free ourselves from the shackles of ignorance and everything else, is within.

          Hen to Pan. You are One. You are All. But feel nonetheless free to believe whatever you want.

      • First, you must define “Universe” – ambiguity will get you less than nowhere.
        The correct approach is Neutral Monism: Omniverse(Multiverse, Universe)
        3rd(2nd, 1st) Grammatical Person. QED.

  3. Nope.

    God, as always, is a human fictional creation to explain something we don’t understand.

    Even such ‘respected’ scientists as mentioned don’t understand everything and use the ole fall back explanation of there being a ‘god’. Seriously undermines their credibility though.

    • I completely agree. Especially since almost everything in this article can be debunked by a person with an intermediary understanding of basic science.

  4. Man, this site is going to the shitters. Becoming more clickbait than Upworthy and Buzzfeed. You guys are just trying to generate revenue by putting up ads, with over the top titles. Anonymous doesn’t even have an “HQ”, anyone who’s been in it for more than a day knows that.
    Whatever happened to objective and realistic journalism?

  5. beware that this theory is probably a hoax in which history, story and elite can be held by its verifiability index. and no science can prove the existence of god. you have to see by yourself. because so then to not to equilibrate people or to the elite to not to fall, they will tell everyone, it’s in the hands of god or -gods- now. it only depends on him her. so why the medium class disappered? is it gods’ hands. a planet survives and lives by its gaia ecosystem. so if god exists, why the elite is on that position, when everyone else isn’t? or even unique gifts and ways to be personalities paths destinies… where is all that? do you wanna know the universe that way? and one more thing is if god exists, do he or she want you to populate new planets? is it your destiny or your gift? maggets? why not populate/colonize clear space instead and have floating cities… or floating cities in middle water… go lie to another land. liars

  6. and god is not found by a particle, never it would be a destiny fate or conformity and people and beings are free because they are and need to be independent and self suficient of themselves. so how many gods there are? do you need to find new intelligences and languages and forms of communication to find and answer to the question is there a god? so why do you talk about it or publish on the internet? you might know that god very well. do you have permissions, and are you on his/her will, is it on his/her way to write things on the internet even with all those letters and numbers… what if one god is the virus and a goddess is the antivirus… are they made to fit one another… and less yet the state of god and mind and matter existence… what would be that state, existence or nature or plane or existence or realm where would be born grown exist live gods??? would it be needed to fit more?? is god a being? it doesn’t exist… if there would be one there would be many like 3infinites gods… because that’s how everything works… so god would create good values like happiness and freedom and company and family and fertility and abundance and he would then not be single nor alone nor in solitude… so how many there would be?? a male and a female?? how many genders??? omnivore??? l0ol… see there are no gods… it would be to live in solitude and solitude is static immutable and inertia. doesn’t live, more, needs to change its state.

  7. What u all r not seeing is that the whole note is not a new or even an article at all… In fact is a message i don’t know the code but i am enough autistic to see the pattern i guess…

    In my country Argentina was a time when a kind of gubernamental agency called Triple A have a dirty job, kill ppl, this agency kill everyone with the capacity of think out of the sociopolitical and economic model, u haven’t idea about the agents they was be ever an anonymous team of ppl selected to do the job.

    When i see a group like this kind, the only thing i see, is a triple A like organization, looking for those minds aware, ready to do the dirty job and maintain the beautiful fucking world in the eternal shadows…

    U r like a light for a beetle and this note u know in the same way like me… Is a message for a group and is not usefull information for no one…

  8. “by the almost unbelievable complexity of the arrangements which are needed to produce life”

    Just because something has complexity, doesn’t mean it was created by an intelligent creator. This is the oldest and most logically flawed argument of creationism.

  9. Gerard Schroeder should probably have his credentials stripped. The Big Bang wasn’t a “beginning”, it was a change of physical condition. There was something before the big bang, but the big bang was simply the inflation of those dense particles into the universe. CBR doesn’t show a beginning, it is the remnants of an explosion from what had already existed. This article is full of flawed understanding of scientific knowledge being masqueraded as “evidence” of a god. Just because something is mysterious, doesn’t mean it was the work of a creator, and it certainly wouldn’t be evidence of it.

  10. The “hand of god” is your evidence? Ever heard of Pareidolia? Again, this is not scientific evidence. It’s illogical conclusions being drawn from even more illogical thinking.

  11. Elon Musks simulation theory is quickly becoming the most logical, rational reason why we are here. We are all nothing but a complex version of the Sims. I have a feeling the further development of quantum computers will confirm this. That being said, something had to create the computer simulation we call life, so does that make him/her/it God? Or are they merely a god-like simulation themselves? Whoever or whatever the reason is as to why we are here, I doubt humans are programmed to ever understand, and accepting that fact rather than fighting over who is right or wrong is the true logical and rational thing to do..

  12. I love how it takes a bunch of scientist who have no idea what’s going on, to tell us what Bill Hicks already described years ago, only difference is they give it an important sounding label such as ‘revolutionary string theory’

    ‘Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves. Heres Tom with the Weather…’

  13. Coming to the conclusion that there is a “God” is exactly the same as it has always been.

    When you can’t explain something we simply attribute it to “God”. People have been using this excuse for millennia, and how many things have we since fully understood and realised it wasn’t “God” after all?

    It just proves we still don’t understand everything yet. And probably never will.

  14. good explanation. .imagine there is a force in earth which decides about us all humans..
    It decides you need this and it gives us this .. so that force is intellgent and we call itgod..

  15. The Buddhist monks have known for thousands of years that it is all a vibration like music. Consciousness doesn’t need a beginning or an end as it is not a thing.

  16. Lost all credibility in this website, total bullshit.. I guess the owner is also a shitty believer.. Disliked and left, never coming back.

  17. ha. funny comments… and they have a point.
    That was weak. The God Particle. Ridiculous. Almost infantile… but ok. So be it.
    Here’s a cartoon to help remind you about the basics of quantum physics.
    Wait for it at the end, kids.

    The point being, the particles that make up… everything in the entire know universe could have never collapsed from a wave of pure potential unto a particle of actual matter unless there had been a first observer.

    (And for the record the God of Islam is not depicted as anything ever.
    Unnamed, unnumbered, unseen, invisible, unknown, not-knowable,
    unmanifest and abundantly merciful etc etc)

  18. A rather high-brow and serious discussion here (y) Bravo Anons.

    Although the new breed of “proofs” seems as easily discharged as so much other “theomania” … why do they need the “God-thing”?

    The Chinese and all Buddhists live very well without “the invisible super-friend in the sky”, they have morals and hope in times of need from their tradition.

    And so do all peoples of the earth; in my tradition the Cosmic Freya will lead some of mankind to the stars (the Milky Way: Brisingamen her necklace we will lift to savor the milk of her paps, and if She does not take us there, Loki will 🙂 )

    The prophet of the lovely Star heard this: “I am alone: there is no God where I am.” (Liber Al II.23) and as he wrote himself … “There is no God but man” (Liber Oz).

    But may your God go with you – why should it matter as long as it makes your day (and night)?

  19. This is click bait, the origin of universe can be formed by a lot of reasons, line the interaction with other universes, or even a cosmological ciclic universe, the whole text try to confuse, the idiot that wrote it uses thinks, and claims for proves, I can claim the sky is orange in every moment but it no proves.

  20. Cosmological concept which is complete from logical point of view
    Initial composition of boundless space from the point of view of element:
    1.It is suffucient to declare existence of two elements, SIMPLE and COMPLEX, possesing closed systemic appearance in order to imagine different (homogenous) and completed one.
    2.It is sufficient to declare existence of Lord and Almighty in other element, possesing non-closed systematic appearance in order to imagine it as different and incomplete as heterogenous (in other words: various type).
    It is not difficult to presume that simple and complex compression is happened in possible minimal widening from permanent widening level, first, inclination to descending, from material component of God from non-material component of Divine Spirit/separation happened as maximum possible diversity (1H) on essence of God on minimum possible numeric homogeneity regarding with blockage of start of non-material components, permanently widening, inclined to their increase of essence/God widens minimal possible homogeneity as maximum possible numeric diversity (2H) to His essence on the basis of 1H material components. Closing process starts only from time, known to God, starting from completion of 2 H opening process. Closing process reopens according to initial opening level of Divine Spirit 1H-1H process of God to 2H process and conversion possibilities of 2H process to 1 H process!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here