Horsham, UK, 2013 – Tony Rooke, in an act of civil disobedience, refused to pay the mandatory £130 TV license fee claiming it violates Section 15 of the Terrorism Act. Rooke’s accusation was aimed at the BBC who reported the collapse of WTC 7 over 20 minutes before it actually fell, and the judge accepted Rooke’s argument. While it was not a public inquiry into 9/11, the recognition of the BBC’s actions on September 11th are considered a small victory, one that was never reported in the US.
“Today was an historic day for the 9/11 truth movement,” Peter Drew of AE911Truth UK told Digital Journal, “with over 100 members of the public attending, including numerous journalists from around the UK as well as from across other parts of Europe.”
Under Section 363 of the Communications Act, citizens of the UK are required to purchase an annual license in order to use a television receiver. Rooke refused to pay the license fee due to a section of the Terrorism Act that states:
It is an offence for someone to invite another to provide money, intending that it should be used, or having reasonable cause to suspect that it may be used, for terrorism purposes.
The fact that the BBC reported the collapse of WTC 7 twenty-three minutes before it actually fell indicates that the UK was aware of the attacks on 9/11 before they actually happened. The direct implication is that they were working with the “terrorists”, all arguments as to who the terrorists actually were aside.
Here is a broadcast of the BBC’s announcement that WTC 7 (Salomon Brothers Building) collapsed when it was still standing behind the reporter:
Clear picture:
Rooke had been given a six-month conditional discharge and told to pay £200 after admitting that he owned a television and watched it without a license. He represented himself at Horsham Magistrates’ Court in West Sussex.
“Mr. Rooke puts the basis of his defence under Section 15 of the Terrorism Act, effectively asking the court to find the BBC is a terrorist organisation and that if he continues to pay them he himself is committing a criminal offence.” – District Judge Stephen Nicholls
In Rooke’s statement to the court:
“I believe the BBC, who are directly funded by the licence fee, are furthering the purposes of terrorism and I have incontrovertible evidence to this effect. I do not use this word lightly given where I am.”
Although he was not allowed to show his video evidence in court due to the District Judge deeming it irrelevant to the trial, the fact that the BBC reported WTC 7’s collapse over 20 minutes beforehand proved to be evidence enough.
He also made reference to the theories behind the collapse of WTC 7 being a controlled demolition, as the evidence suggests. In an additional statement:
“The BBC reported it 20 minutes before it fell. They knew about it beforehand. Last time I was here I asked you (the judge): ‘Were you aware of World Trade Centre 7?’ You said you had heard of it. Ten years later you should have more than heard of it. It’s the BBC’s job to inform the public. Especially of miracles of science and when laws of physics become suspended.
“They have made programmes making fools of and ridiculing those of us who believe in the laws of gravity. American reports have shown that the fall was nothing but a controlled demolition.
“I am not looking at who demolished it—that is impossible—but the BBC actively tried to hide this from the public.”
In response from Judge Nicholls:
“Even if I accept the evidence you say, this court has no power to create a defence in the manner which you put forward.”
In light of the evidence the judge took into consideration, Rooke was given an unconditional discharge, which in British legal parlance means he “was convicted but he does not suffer the consequences of a conviction, and the conviction will be erased if he is not brought before the court for six months”. He was not required to pay the fee and non-payment fine either—only court costs of £200.
Sources:
Alexander, Victoria. Digital Journal. Feb 27, 2013. (http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/344438)
Duell, Mark. Daily Mail. Feb 25, 2015. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2284337/TV-licence-evader-refused-pay-BBC-covered-facts-9-11.html)
Livingston, Bob. Personal Liberty. Apr 5, 2013. (http://personalliberty.com/british-man-wins-small-victory-for-911-truthers/)
Realities Watch. Mar 6, 2015. (http://realitieswatch.com/uk-man-wins-court-case-against-bbc-for-911-cover-up/)
building sever did not belong to Solomon .brothers it housed government offices including the emergency command post of nyc police… It also held records from the district attorney including files on ENRON and World com that were under investigation at the time…these records were destroyed… Please reexamine the Solomon brothers claim..they might have had a back office in #7 but it was not a class a building …it was as we have seen a throw away…
Is this a satire? Because the fact that Ms. Stanley reported that 7 may have fallen is quite consistent with the facts on the ground.7 was unstable from impacts and raging fires and the FDNY expected it to collapse right around the time it actually did.Nothing nefarious about an erroneous report in the heat of the moment.It’s paranoid lunacy to fall for this trope that the BBC was in on a supposed operation and blew the call.
Utterly ridiculous and next this guy will be suing the BBC for failing to provide a soapbox for the clown car honking on about Larry the Jew saying “pull it”.
Building 7 sustained no impacts. It was also reinforced at great expense to withstand fire and bomb attacks. Your argument is invalid. It is not consistent with the facts. If anyone claimed they suspected it would collapse, they must of been directly involved and knew for a fact what was going to take place.
Fell in perfect symmetry in 6.5 secs , 70 %of free fall speed. Controlled demolition as sure as the earth is round . Deal with it.
How much do you save on bills when you’re spoon fed from the T.V.??
These guy is stealing mexican technology to sell it to the Rothschild and illuminati companies, he made a lot of money stealing our taxes, like with my technology ir called ERP stolen from PEMEX when there is an agreement plus no body has my permission to use it for technical parameters no ORACLE, NO SAP , no any indian origen IT company or other Accounting and IT company https://lnkd.in/eQCQZ6k https://lnkd.in/eUzBg8p World Wide Notitification to SAP, ORACLE , Indian origen IT companies or ERP system companies, I am the creator of the ERP and I am starting to sue in Mexico, USA and Spain for stealing my technologyand using it for accounting and fiscal fraud world wide, Their clients do not have to pay them please deposit the money with a judge or you will be sue as well. It is a well know legal case by the World Wide agencies at this time . Several Embassies of USA and Mexico have been notified you can contact them as well as the police in your location or any other Law Enforcement Agency in your State. The Clintons are only part of the CIA-Bush-Fox-Gortari multinational illuminati army, they are involved in child and human trafficking using illegal Walmart businesses while they are doing also money laundry through indian origen IT companies, in their IT Development Centers like Infosys Technologies and Cognizant, the Mexican Government is not paying me 3 million pesos for my IMSS coverage https://lnkd.in/empVMnH https://lnkd.in/eqC6fEP https://mexicoleaks.mx/enviar.html https://lnkd.in/e-buH43 https://lnkd.in/evzQ3sw What a Rothchild power they have that they know everything is done in the American Embassy in Mexico City, and after the top ones in the Mexican Agencies like PGR, Cisen, Policia Federal know what Washington, DC will know after but it is only internet information already https://lnkd.in/eGvH5v4 https://lnkd.in/e7AS4Kn https://lnkd.in/eKg7sHx The Rothschild jew nazy illuminati infiltered Corporates and Government in the toppest postions they are destroying Mexico as never before all time, killing mexican to steal our tax money https://lnkd.in/eG75hNi https://lnkd.in/eWdfci3 https://lnkd.in/eWdfci3 https://lnkd.in/eVVHJKu US does not have the capacity to do that because the indian IT origen mind control consultants infiltered Government and also they infiltered the American Embassy in Mexico City sending only lies of LATAM to Washington, DC that you can find in internet, It seems like a Rothschild office, the mexican agencies knows everything it happens there in advance than Washington, DC https://lnkd.in/e-7ajTH My technology it called ERP using industrial engineering as a science can definetly stop the accounting and fiscal frauds of the illuminati world wide, I catched the richest family in the earth the Rothschild, adding to my list Bush, Clintons, owner of Walmart amomg others, list is increasing fast, DEA owes me 1 million dollars for services no paid, and the Mexican Government 3 million pesos for my IMSS pension for labor risk insurance coverage for being attack for Infosys Technologies and Cognized after being assigned to Walmart Mexico City reporting to Walmart corporate https://lnkd.in/ef6yEQN
Are you related to Karin Waldegrave?
SAP, ORACLE, indian origen IT companies, accounting firms killed the accounting and fiscal regulators at the WTC in NYC in the 911, they were starting working with my technology it called ERP with Activity Based Costing https://lnkd.in/ebbEv7e
https://vid.me/1y8V https://lnkd.in/e9DErgY World Wide Notitification to SAP, ORACLE , Indian origen IT companies or ERP system companies, I am the creator of the ERP and I am starting to sue in Mexico, USA and Spain for stealing my technologyand using it for accounting and fiscal fraud world wide, Their clients do not have to pay them please deposit the money with a judge or you will be sue as well. It is a well know legal case by the World Wide agencies at this time . Several Embassies of USA and Mexico have been notified you can contact them as well as the police in your location or any other Law Enforcement Agency in your State. SAP, ORACLE, indian origen IT companies, accounting firms killed the accounting and fiscal regulators at the WTC in NYC in the 911, they were starting working with my technology it called ERP with Activity Based Costing https://lnkd.in/ebbEv7e
Nice try at poisoning the well with crazy talk shill spammer.
Fuck off.
Lol – you had me going for a minute then
How is conditional discharge a victory for anyone other than Mr Rooke?
@ what? – I expect that this test case now makes the case for others not to pay for their TV licenses either, i.e. if they use the same argument then they too will only receive a conditional discharge.
Are there any further details on the judge’s narrative?
I was flipping channels that day and saw the BBC report live. That’s when I got suspicious.
The kind of “news” that anyone aware that the illuminati totally control “justice” would obvously not read.
Illuminati joke staged with an actor, packaged in the “volatile news” format.
Main Goal: refresh the brains of human cattle about “BBC reported the collapse of WTC 7 over 20 minutes before it actually fell”, one of the 9/11 acts fulfilling “Truth in plain sight”.
February 2013 – Daily Mail, the lone report in illuminati mass media:
TV licence evader refused to pay because the ‘BBC covered up facts about 9/11 and claimed tower fell 20 minutes before it did’
March 2015: Final act reported only by “alternative news sites” alias the illuminati web of disinfo:
Tony Rooke, in an act of civil disobedience, refused to pay the mandatory £130 TV license fee claiming it violates Section 15 of the Terrorism Act.
Rooke’s accusation was aimed at the BBC who reported the collapse of WTC 7 over 20 minutes before it actually fell, and the judge accepted Rooke’s argument.
While it was not a public inquiry into 9/11, the recognition of the BBC’s actions on September 11th are considered a small victory, one that was never reported in the US.
Other Goals of this joke:
This type of mockery: human cattle awarded millions by the illuminati.
Note: millions comes from multiplying the license fee of £130 by the millions who supposedly could also be exempted by bringing the same case to court.
Who cares what the British think about American issues? I can win a lawsuit in America (before the right judge) in a lawsuit against England for invading Ireland. What the heck does that have to do with the price of Guinness!?
LOL!
Thanks for the vigilance, Anon…but doesn’t the story at LEAST need to matter?
I think the story matters, because I saw Donald Rumsfeld on American television, say he knew nothing about building 7. He was interviewed after 9-11, and asked about building 7. He was like, what is building 7? This story is important so that Donald Rumsfeld will know about the magical free of building 7.
Oops – this story is untrue! Check the facts more thoroughly! http://www.checktheevidence.com/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=373&Itemid=60
You should really get a new hobby.
You folks need to check into the SMOKING GUN ! Building 6 was empty inside as if scooped out by God . All 4 walls were left standing!? ANYONE trying to discuss building 7 instead of or without mentioning building 6 is quite suspect to Us .
can i please ask what this TV licence fee is about? you have to pay an annual fee to have a television? I don’t understand……???
seriously??? please explain, ?
In Britain you must pay a fee to the BBC for their channels. This is compulsory and if you fail you are fined or may face prison