10 Facts About Wikipedia Founder That Will Shock The Hell Out Of You


Did you know that Jimmy Wales was a porn king who sold online pornography before launching Wikipedia – the world’s online trove of collective knowledge? Did you know that Wikipedia is anti-science and is actually edited by corporate-paid trolls on important topics such as GMOs, vaccines, chemotherapy and pharmaceuticals, and not by anonymous volunteer editors as claimed? If these didn’t shock you, here’re 10 startling facts that will shake your confidence in Wikipedia and its founder Jimmy Wales:

  1. Wikipedia Was Started With Revenue From Soft-Core Porn

Wales launched a web search engine called Bomis in 1996. A big part of the site was the “Bomis Babe Report” dedicated to half naked celebrities and women. The site also hosted nekkid.info, a place “to see sexy naked women” and “The Babe Engine” an image search engine dedicated to finding pictures of attractive women.


  1. Wikipedia Knowingly Distributed Child Pornography

Larry Sanger, co-founder of Wikipedia, told the FBI that Wikimedia Commons (the parent company of Wiki products including Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wikinews and Wikiquote) is rife with renderings of children performing sexual acts. A 2010 Fox News investigation reportedly revealed the site “has become home base for a loose worldwide network of pedophiles who are campaigning to spin the popular online encyclopedia in their favor and are trying to lure more people into their world.”


  1. Jimmy ‘Jimbo’ Wales Dumped Lover On Wikipedia

Wales used the world’s most popular online encyclopedia as a means of dumping his girlfriend – onetime Fox News pundit Rachel Marsden. Marsden responded by sending Valleywag an IM conversation that indicates Wales ordered changes to her Wikipedia biography in an effort to further his personal agenda. The email and sex chats seem to implicate Wales in an apparent conflict of interest involving top-down editing of Marsden’s Wikipedia entry.


  1. Wales’ Girlfriend Sold His Clothes On Ebay

In purported retaliation, Rachel, a well-known conservative columnist, decided she could take the clothes he had left at her apartment and auction them off on eBay Canada.

auction auction2

  1. Donor Exposed Wales’ Lies And Deceit

Jeff Merkey, a former Novell chief scientist, accused Jimmy Wales of extortion. He stated that Wales agreed to place him under his “special protection” as an editor in exchange for a substantial donation and other financial support of the Wikimedia Foundation projects.


  1. Wales Keeps A Watchful Eye Over Hillary Clinton’s Wikipedia Entry

Despite the steady wave of scandals that have begun to erode even the New York Times’ portrayal of Hillary Clinton, her image remains unblemished on Wikipedia. Since he first started editing her page in June 2005, Hillary’s “Wikipedia watchdog” has been guarding against slanders, accusations, unfair assumptions, and distortions on the high-traffic, heavily footnoted, highly policed Hillary Rodham Clinton Wikipedia page.

  1. Paid PR Scandal Erupted At Wikipedia

In 2012, Roger Bamkin, trustee of the Wikimedia Foundation UK, and a Wikipedian In Residence were caught editing Wikipedia pages and facilitating front-page placement for their pay-for-play, publicity-seeking clients.

  1. Wikipedia In The Midst Of An International Extortion Scandal

Recently, the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that sponsors but does not operate Wikipedia, announced that it suspended 381 accounts for “black hat” editing, in which editors charge and accept money for “to promote external interests”. The scam affected English Wikipedia, which boasts 4.9 million articles, has over 26 million users, and 1,343 administrators. Hundreds of small British businesses and minor celebrities were targeted by a high-level blackmail scam that was orchestrated by “rogue editors” at Wikipedia.

  1. Jimmy Wales Openly Despises Natural Medicine And The Healing Arts

Wikipedia deliberately allows corporate-funded Wikipedia editors to disparage authors, naturopaths, doctors and practitioners who help people heal.

am gmo homeo nature

  1. Wales Traded Wikipedia Edits For Sex

If Natural News is to be believed, Jimmy Wales traded Wikipedia edits for sex by exploiting his editorial position over a female editor, ordered the intimidation and harassment of Wikipedia editors who attempted to maintain a truly “neutral point of view” about Jimmy Wales himself, and exploited his position within the Wikimedia Foundation to attempt to bury details about his own past.

This Article (10 Facts About Wikipedia Founder That Will Shock The Hell Out Of You) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and AnonHQ.com.


Get Your Anonymous T-Shirt / Sweatshirt / Hoodie / Tanktop, Smartphone or Tablet Cover or Mug In Our Spreadshirt Shop! Click Here



  1. on top of that the scorpions photo is taken completly out of context JUST to prove your point… im seriously loseing faith in this site

  2. How the f is this bitch even on the streets? People get 5 years for murder, 3 years for rape and 10 years for fudging on their income tax, but this child porn man walks free. That is babylon usa, it will soon burn and all will see her smoke from afar.

  3. On the pornography… from the source given:

    “It’s a false claim related largely to some historic early 20th century drawings, as described in the summary published by the Wikipedia Signpost. The Wikimedia Foundation’s General Counsel examined the drawings and concluded that they do not violate federal laws; we have not received any communication from the FBI to the contrary, and when and if we are asked by authorities to remove images that are illegal, we will do so.”

  4. Omg.

    This website is as corrupted as the others.

    How the hell can Fox news be a source loL!!!!!

    Child porn! What a classic government propaganda accentuation lol.

    (If we say he did child porn EVERYBODY will automatically hate him)

    Yeah he prob made porn sites or serach engines for grown ups, Child Porn Network? Any vestern Country had jailed him long ago if it was true and we all had heard about it in the TV. Never once in the TV in Denmark they used wikipeda founder and porn in same sentence because it is a fucking made up lie.

    Burn in hell author you either stupid human-being or corrupted fucker.

    Even the pictures of wikipeda GMo and Alternative meidince prove nothing , it is just saying what the mainstream medicine field/doctors that is in bed with the medicinal industry are paid to say. That natural medicine is not proven to work and there is no OFFICIAL evidence that GMO dont harm humans.

  5. Wikipedia is based on you cant claim something to be true without having a thrusted source to link back to. And no a random site wont count in the eyes of the public, it have to be a big and known one (corrupted)

  6. Remember assange and other whistleblowers have a lot more classifided informations on hand they never showed us. But if they did show us they would be killed on a instant I guess.

    Like Kennedy was killed within a wee kafter officially saying America is corrupted and evil.

    And Martin Luther king who became too big a threat to the agenda of the elite.

    Or noone would believe it because it would be so far from the fake reality people live in.

    You have to inform people slowly, you cant throw the whole truth at a naive and not too smart mainstream person at once, then they wont believe you.

    You have to tell them the truth a little at a time.

    Small bites of the truth.

  7. Some facts are quite shocking. How the Wikipedia started and what heinous activities are going on (behind the scenes).

  8. I had my own doubts before reading this. The world’s leading authority on Air Force chemtrails (spraying nanoparticles of aluminum and other substances in the sky, which you may have seen as intense patterns of skypaths similar to contrails but far longer lasting), has put together a remarkable array of highly diverse evidence about what’s going on. He reports that day after day he puts up valid new information and it vanishes by the next day. The entries under “chemtrails” read like they were written by a USAF public relations officer– and maybe they were. Other views and evidence are simply erased, 1984-style. (Also see Stanley Krippner’s home page and his reports about Wikipedia’s “gang bang” biased editors. I now read Wikipedia with a very skeptical eye, and I will never again send them a donation as I have in the past.)


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here