George W. Bush May Stand Trial For War Crimes In Iraq

Credit – AFP

11

at trueactivist.com

Judges in California will hear oral arguments in the case tomorrow morning.

For centuries, the US has committed war crimes around the world and rarely suffered negative consequences as a result. Some of the US most notable war criminals, such as Henry Kissinger and Barack Obama, have received numerous accolades, including the Nobel Peace Prize, despite their dark legacies. However, things may soon change as former President George W. Bush may be forced to stand trial over the war crimes his administration committed in Iraq. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in California recently confirmed that Judges Susan Graber and Andrew Hurwitz will hear oral arguments in the case of Saleh v. Bush, beginning tomorrow December 12th. Other members of Bush’s administration, such as Dick Cheney, Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz, are also named as defendants in the case.

The case was brought against Bush by Sundus Shaker Saleh, an Iraqi woman who charges Bush and high-ranking officials in his administration with breaking international and US law by planning and executing the invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq. Saleh maintains that Bush and his colleagues are guilty of the “crime of aggression,” which was defined as the “supreme international crime” at the 1946 Nuremberg Trials.

In the case, Saleh is appealing the immunity provided to Bush and the other defendants by California’s Ninth Circuit court in 2014, after they were urged to do so by President Obama and the Department of Justice. Saleh previously tried to take Bush to court in 2013 until the Department of Justice intervened. The California Court dismissed her case in December 2014, citing the Westfall Act of 1988, which immunizes former federal officials in civil lawsuits if a court determines that the official was acting within the legitimate scope of his or her position. However, this time around, Saleh argues that the invasion of Iraq fell outside the legitimate scope of employment of former President Bush and his administration. Plenty of evidence since the invasion took place has shown that the administration knowingly lied to justify and execute the war by falsely claiming Iraq under Saddam Hussein possessed “weapons of mass destruction.” The real reason, however, was that Hussein had stopped selling Iraqi oil in dollars by switching to euros, threatening US hegemony in the region.

“We are pleased that the Ninth Circuit will hear argument. To my knowledge, this is the first time a court will entertain arguments that the Iraq War was illegal under domestic and international law,” Saleh’s attorney D. Inder Comar said. “This is also the first time since World War II that a court is being asked to scrutinize whether the war itself was an illegal act of aggression — a special war crime that was defined at the Nuremberg Trials in 1946.”

The oral arguments, set to begin tomorrow, will be live streamed and recorded on the Ninth Circuit’s YouTube channel – that is, unless last minute intervention prevents the oral arguments from taking place. The Court will begin hearing arguments at 9 AM PST, though the Saleh v. Bush case is last on the docket and will likely take place later in the morning. If the case advances, it could create a legal precedent that would allow other US and foreign presidents and officials to be charged for their crimes, such as former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair who also had a hand in the war crimes committed in Iraq. Though justice demands that George W. Bush be brought to trial for war crimes, one cannot help, but hold lingering doubts that he will ever see the inside of a court room as, time and again, the “Deep State” almost always intervenes to protect its own.

What are your thoughts? Please comment below and share this news!


This article (George W. Bush May Stand Trial For War Crimes In Iraq) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and TrueActivist.com

catch (error) {}

11 COMMENTS

    • Because you to are a idiot if you think mainstream media will post something like this. Ofcourse Bush will win this 100% guaranteed and the story will never be revealed… I guess you to are another American brain washed moron… I pity you and the rest of your country.

      • Basic sentence structure calls for, an, to be used in front of idiot, not, a, and “I guess you to are another…” should be, “I guess you too, are another.”

        Your guess implies that you don’t know as a matter of fact, but instead have a theory… and we all know what theories mean, don’t we. They just don’t mean much unless they are substantiated. As for the subject matter of your theory, “brain washed moron” would imply that Americans are unfamiliar with the Hegelian dialectic. You know, the divide and conquer strategy that has been used on mankind for centuries to control their behavior. You obviously are too far removed from recent events to recognize what is occurring at present. For brevity, I’ll just end the comment with the observation that your chosen web identity is fitting… you are an idiot. But I forgive you… forgive me.

    • I doubt a California court would have a war crimes trial. Is that how it starts, for extradition?

      I think war crimes trials is The World Court, The Hague.

      The report of WMD’s got us into that war, and that we are allies of England.

      Tony Blair reported the WMD’s to Parliament. In England, it is a crime for the Prime Minister to lie to Parliament and much was made about it.

      Others have said the CIA got us into that war: I only read the claim the CIA trained Saddam Hussein. I think our intelligence report of WMD’s came from UK.

      For the most part, allies pull us into their wars.

      The Obama administration has no excuse.

      Of course, abuses during war are war crimes regardless of the start.

  1. Click on “recently confirmed” in the first paragraph, they have the site where it states that it is taking place in court. Where is the Bs?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.