Scientists Publish Study Admitting Climate Change is “Not as Bad as we Thought”

0
DCIM100MEDIADJI_0204.JPG

Recently, a study was published in the American Meteorological Society’s Journal of Climate that reports climate change is not nearly as bad as is “widely accepted,” challenging the veracity of what the mainstream media constantly fearmongers as an accepted fact.

A city under water – Could this become reality one day? Some scientists say “no”.

The study predicts that the impact of climate change would be up to 45 percent less intense than what they say it will be, but this is extremely vague, as all the root methods of obtaining climate data unfortunately are.

American climatologist Judith Curry and UK mathematician Nick Lewis carried out the study, and media outlets everywhere that surely have some financial interest in pushing the narrative of climate change quietly added little pieces to articles going against the study, such as this piece of an Express article that says:

“But the study emerged as other scientists said winter waves pounding the Scottish and Irish coasts have grown grow by up to 5ft 6in (1.7metres) over the past 70 years.

Rising sea levels and more intense storms are in line with global warming forecasts.”

In reality, there’s a reason why every mainstream media outlet unanimously reports that climate change is real.

It is known by other people that it is very difficult to know what information to trust on the average warming or cooling temperatures of our entire planet, but whether or not climate change is real, geoengineering is likely to be a much larger factor in the changing weather patterns on Earth than carbon dioxide.

A major long-term reason for the narrative of climate change is to justify daily, regular geoengineering of the weather and spraying of the skies.

A couple years ago it was introduced into the mainstream: articles started to circulate about the need to “hack the Planet” and spray the skies with reflective particles to “stop global warming.”

"/

A narrative is emerging to justify geoengineering, modification of the weather, with the idea that global warming is going to destroy us all.

Entire books have been written about the history of efforts to weaponize weather, most notably “Ch**trails Exposed: a New Manhattan Project,” which you can read at this linkand get fully up to date with the evidence to support all that is being said in this article.

Just a brief excerpt on the consistent, decade-by-decade history of military efforts to control the weather (which did not fail) can be taken from the aforementioned book:

“In his paper ‘How to Wreck the Environment,’ LBJ’s Presidential science advisor Dr. Gordon J.F. MacDonald wrote of man controlling weather. As a chapter in the book ‘Unless Peace Comes,’ MacDonald writes, “No matter how deeply disturbing the thought of using the environment to manipulate behavior for national advantage is to some, the technology permitting such use will very probably develop within the next few decades.” He continues, “Operations producing such conditions might be carried out covertly, since nature’s great irregularity permits storms, floods, draughts, earthquakes and tidal waves to be viewed as unusual but not unexpected. Such a ‘secret war’ need never be declared or even known by the affected populations. It could go on for years with only the security forces involved being aware of it. The years of draught and storm would be attributed to unkindly nature, and only after a nation was thoroughly drained would an armed takeover be attempted.”

We don’t want them to gain this power, our consent, to spray the skies every day and block out the sun to “fight climate change.” Unfortunately evidence suggests they are already doing it and few people care or notice.

The consequences of allowing them to openly spray the skies would be enormous, and we are already suffering from whatever they have been spraying on us for the past several years.

The aluminum, barium, strontium and other materials that are constantly cited in geoengineering patents and efforts extending back several decades are showing up in rain tests.

Countless rain tests specifically in Northern California have shown for the past several years those geoengineering related metals are raining down on us, at the exact same time that unusual spraying activity is observed and smelled.

This video was taken over Sacramento, California in March 2016 at the same time as rain samples were taken in the city.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.