Anti-Vaxxer Biologist Stefan Lanka Bets Over $100K Measles Isn’t A Virus; He Wins In German Federal Supreme Court

52
11613

By prophylactic vaccination of adults and especially children against measles, the pharmaceutical industry has earned Billions over a 40-year period. The judges at the German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) confirmed in a recent ruling that measles virus do not exist though. Furthermore: There is not a single scientific study in the world which could prove the existence of such virus so far. This raises the question of what was actually injected into millions of German citizens over the past decades. According to the judgment by the Supreme Court, it may not have been a vaccine against measles.

by Dr. Stefan Lanka

The Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has ruled in the measles virus trial. The First Civil Senate of the BGH has confirmed the judgment by the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart (OLG) of the 16 February 2016. The sum of €100,000 which I had offered as a reward for scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus does not have to be paid to the plaintiff. The plaintiff also was ordered to bear all procedural costs.

Five experts have been involved in the case and presented the results of scientific studies. All five experts, including Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Podbielski who had been appointed by the OLG Stuttgart as the preceding court, have consistently found that none of the six publications which have been introduced to the trial, contains scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus.

Genetics falsifies thesis of existence

In the trial, the results of research into so-called genetic fingerprints of alleged measles virus have been introduced. Two recognised laboratories, including the world’s largest and leading genetic Institute, arrived at exactly the same results independently.The results prove that the authors of the six publications in the measles virus case were wrong, and as a direct result all measles virologists are still wrong today: They have misinterpreted ordinary constituents of cells as part of the suspected measles virus.

Because of this error, during decades of consensus building process, normal cell constituents were mentally assembled into a model of a measles virus. To this day, an actual structure that corresponds to this model has been found neither in a human, nor in an animal. With the results of the genetic tests, all thesis of existence of measles virus has been scientifically disproved.

The authors of the six publications and all other persons involved, did not realise the error because they violated the fundamental scientific duty, which is the need to work “lege artis”, i.e. in accordance with internationally defined rules and best practice of science. They did not carry out any control experiments. Control experiments would have protected authors and mankind from this momentous error. This error became the basis of belief in the existence of any disease-causing viruses. The expert appointed by the court, Prof. Dr. Dr. Podbielski, answering to the relevant question by the court, as per page 7 of the protocol explicitly confirmed that the authors did not conduct any control experiments.

The OLG Stuttgart on 16 February 2016 overturned the judgment of the court of first instance, dismissed the action and referred, inter alia, to the central message of Prof. Podbielski with respect to the six publications. The plaintiff filed an appeal against the judgment of the OLG to the Supreme Court. As reason he stated his subjective, yet factually false perception of the trial sequence at the court in Stuttgart, and the assertion that our naming of facts about measles posed a threat to public health. The plaintiff’s position was rejected by the Supreme Court in plain words. Thus, the Supreme Court confirmed the judgment of the OLG Stuttgart from 16 February 2016.

Conclusions

The six publications submitted in the trial are the main relevant publications on the subject of “measles virus.” Since further to these six publications there not any other publications which would attempt by scientific methods to prove the existence of the measles virus, the Supreme Court judgment in the measles virus trial and the results of the genetic tests have consequences: Any national and international statements on the alleged measles virus, the infectivity of measles, and on the benefit and safety of vaccination against measles, are since then of no scientific character and have thus been deprived of their legal basis.

Upon enquiries which had been triggered by the measles virus contest, the head of the National Reference Institute for Measles at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Prof. Dr. Annette Mankertz, admitted an important fact. This admission may explain the increased rate of vaccination-induced disabilities, namely of vaccination against measles, and why and how specifically this kind of vaccination seems to increasingly trigger autism.

Prof. Mankertz has admitted that the “measles virus” contains typical cell’s natural components (ribosomes, the protein factories of the cell). Since the vaccination against measles contains whole “whole measles virus”, this vaccine contains cell’s own structures. This explains why vaccination against measles causes frequent and more severe allergies and autoimmune reactions than other types of vaccination. The court expert Prof. Podbielski stated on several occasions that by the assertion of the RKI with regard to ribosomes in the measles virus, the thesis of existence of measles virus has been falsified.

In the trial it was also put on record that the highest German scientific authority in the field of infectious diseases, the RKI, contrary to its legal remit as per § 4 Infection Protection Act (IfSG), has failed to create tests for alleged measles virus and to publish these. The RKI claims that it made internal studies on measles virus, however refuses to hand over or publish the results.

 

Anonymous recommends: Protect your PC & mobile devices from hackers and governments + surf and download anonymously

 

Do you like our independent & investigative news? Then please check these two settings on Facebook to guarantee you don't miss our posts: anonymous news feed and notifications

 

52 COMMENTS

    • Please reread and check your dates and details: “The OLG Stuttgart on 16 February 2016 overturned the judgment of the court of first instance, dismissed the action and referred, inter alia, to the central message of Prof. Podbielski with respect to the six publications.”
      I’m just a reader- I don’t pretend to fully understand or have proof of any kind.

    • Donald, the Daily mail is a reliable source to you? The mainstream media are the absolute worst for ‘False news’. They have their own agenda and want to control the masses way of thinking.

    • Hey scumbag. YOU ARE FULL F SHIT. The “studies” you refer to are ALL BOGUS and backed by the pharmaceutical complex that makes billions off these poisons. Vaccines have NEVER been responsible for eradicating any disease. Go back to selling tickets to your mother’s donkey show, scumbag

      • You guys are the worst kind of sheeple, believing any news that doesn’t come from the mainstream. Learn to think critically! This whole article hasn’t been sourced at all and yet you demand that someone else contradicting it provide some. Wtf?
        Besides, this is written in first person so it’s safe to assume this is straight from the horse’s mouth. Of course he’s going to twist around the words said to complete his agenda.
        It’s clear he won due to semantics and thus does not actually represent the data at all.

        Is there anyone else in the scientific world who is trying to prove the existence of psychosomatic measles? It only seems like the mad rantings of this one guy and the only proof is this one court case. If you know science then you know this isn’t enough to change the idea that’s been gradually built upon since the 7th century AD.

  1. Fake, the man had to payy 100k for making the bullshit claim that measles didn’t exist, not that it actually doesn’t exist, because it obviously does. It’s sad to see how far this site has fallen.

  2. He was ordered to pay $100,000. to Bardal but appealed and won a year later (<-that means he does not have to pay now) on the technicality that Bardal did not fulfill the condition of providing a single proof when in fact he turned in six and was ruled against. He(Bardal) is appealing this latest decision.

    • His ‘proof’ in the six publications was no proof at all, which is why Bardal lost. And he can’t appeal again, as he lost his appeal.

  3. Frankie is right. The OLG ruled that the 6 papers mentioned DID proof the existence of the measles virus. This ruling was not questioned by the German Federal Supreme Court, instead the court interpreted the condition for the payment that the proof had to be in one single peer reviewed paper, which was not the case. BS article…

    • Shame on Dr. Stefan Lanka for writing this article containing misleading information and endangering public health (I hope his license gets revoked) and for anonhq for not fact-checking and publishing such BS!

    • This is NOT what was confirmed. It was confirmed that NONE of the papers proved the existence of a virus. Also that NONE of the science was correctly performed.

    • You are 100% wrong in this. The judge didn’t like it, but found that in none of the six publications was there proof that the measles virus exists. In fact, there is zero proof that there is such a thing as a virus, living or otherwise.

      Bacteria exist, they can be seen under a regular microscope. But to look at anything under an electron microscope, it has to be dead and not moving.

      Just over 100 years ago, the definition of ‘virus’ in encyclopedias was simply ‘poison’. This poison is the RESULT of illness, not the cause of it.

      Claiming that when you centrifuge pus, or other diseased matter, and then take the clear liquid and inject it into healthy people will result in them to be immune, and have better health has been the biggest hoax in history, with pharmaceutical companies, doctors etc. making billions of dollars each year.

      • you should research Dr Royal Raymond Rife, especially his microscope, which did have the ability to resolve so-called “viruses”. viruses are actually bacteria that are orders of magnitude smaller than known bacteria. i am not taking sides on the content of the article here, but merely offering information.
        To be clear however, i do believe that vaccines are a fraud and trojan horse for various purpposes, but that is another discussion
        research Rife microscopes and the rife machines.

        • The lies of Pasteur displaced Bechamp’s discoveries. Naessens and Rife and others align more in the pleomorphic understanding the smaller living informational/energetic entities operate functions in the body and that in stress these functions call on further workarounds or back up strategies. I heard about Lanka after reading up on Hamer – and Lanka discovered a wholly benign ‘virus’ in symbiotic healthy function He also aligned with Hamer – and said a few things on the history of ‘medical’ disease as an expression of state power that I found very interesting. Many are waking to the revenue stream of ‘Medical’ power – but its role in deeper levels of narrative control is less obvious.
          The old paradigm is of the power to define, predict and control.
          The new is a recognition of relational balance. The environment includes the layer of belief and isn’t just out there. The wish to force it OUT THERE is the denial and evasion of inner relational conflict projected OUT.
          ‘Germs’ were rational replacements for superstitious nonsense? – No – they were new forms of the same nonsense.
          Beliefs are meant here to mean accepted reality and not wishful identity.
          Many, receiving a diagnosis of a few months to live – die accordingly. But not everyone believes or acts on the belief because something moves them to OPEN to a greater reality rather than struggle or acquiesce within the asserted narrative. Likewise many act as footsoldiers for the medical mafia in belief that NOT conforming to the official narrative endangers lives. The irony of this is tragic.
          A captured mind defends its state. A free mind defends truth – because it NEEDS true relational balance as its foundation.
          The idea is that a wholeness operates functionally – and I see this in people like S Seneff’s work. What we call disease is the symptoms of the body’s attempt to clear or regain function. Not only don’t we recognize and facilitate that, we demonize the symptoms and bring in poisons and block functions while hiding or ignoring cause – as a kind of techno-religion.
          We cant pretend away beliefs or escape by denial – but that they remain active unconsciously. We can re-evaluate them by bringing to a true awareness – and life can bring them to awareness through events and relationships.

  4. Dr Lanka won the appeal last year and the Federal Supreme Court now confirmed that this is the final decision: none of the 6 papers furnished by Dr Bardens demonstrated the existence of a measles virus nor showed its diameter.
    The decision was officially based on the exact wording of the public offer for reward (since Dr Lanka had required that the proof of the existence of the virus AND its diameter should be included in ONE single scientific paper); however, I was present at the trial and the judge also said that the expert’s statements had been too vague (“in the totality of the 6 papers there is the proof”) and it was impossible to know clearly where the proof was; the judge also said they would have even accepted a review paper, IF that paper had had the stringent conclusion “Here is the measles virus and here is its diameter”, but “we did not have this here.”
    That is why the 3 judges decided in favour of Dr Lanka and thus confirmed that none of the papers offered by Dr Bardens contained the proof for the existence of the measles virus.
    Here are the links to the 6 original papers presented by Dr Bardens as “proof” of the existence of the measles virus:
    https://archive.org/details/EndersPeebles1954
    https://archive.org/details/BechVonMagnus1959
    https://archive.org/details/HorikamiMoyer1995
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC375751/
    http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.325.1288&rep=rep1&type=pdf
    http://www.osaka-med.ac.jp/deps/b-omc/articles/532/532daikoku.pdf

    READ for yourselves, especially the Enders paper of 1954, and you will understand that no measles virus has ever been scientifically demonstrated to exist!

    • The judge was an idiot, most likely. A court cannot decide on a scientific matter. And Feli is known to be an idiot too, she doesn’t understand basic science. She is Lanka’s girlfriend the they both believe in the New Germanic Medicine nonsense perpetrated by Dr. Hammer. Hundreds of people died believing this nonsense, please see testimonials here: http://deathsect.com/

      • Mandark you make quite a claim. Suggesting that death due to not adhering to the accepted medical principals is deadly. Hmmm. In the last decade, the American Medical Establishment, consisting of doctors, pharma and hospitals has killed, by their own estimates, over 2.5 million people. 1 million due to prescription drug errors alone. Those numbers say to me; adhering to accepted medical establishment protocols can be deadly, very deadly.

        BTW, the AIDS virus has the exact same problem with never having been defined, but the very costly treatments are defined.

      • The only idiot here is anyone who tries to make this anything it is not. A court CAN decide on a scientific matter you dunce and it has done so here, by simply demanding the actual process of science be adhered to. It hasn’t. You may be convinced by something but that does not amount to scientific proof.

      • I can only repeat what I wrote above, I think it doesn’t get any more obvious than that!
        The decision was officially based on the exact wording of the public offer for reward (since Dr Lanka had required that the proof of the existence of the virus AND its diameter should be included in ONE single scientific paper); however, I was present at the trial and the judge also said that the expert’s statements had been too vague (“in the totality of the 6 papers there is the proof”) and it was impossible to know clearly where the proof was; the judge also said they would have even accepted a review paper, IF that paper had had the stringent conclusion “Here is the measles virus and here is its diameter”, but “we did not have this here.”
        That is why the 3 judges decided in favour of Dr Lanka and thus confirmed that NONE of the papers offered by Dr Bardens contained the proof for the existence of the measles virus.
        I left the links to all 6 papers. Anyone who reads them will see for themselves that there is no trace of a “measles virus” there.

      • So you support elitist dictate because it wears a white coat?
        “Dr Hamer had an exceptionally high success rate with his cancer therapy, by far the highest I have seen of any therapy. During one of several trials of the persecuted Dr Hamer the public prosecutor (Wiener-Neustadt in Austria) had to admit that after 4 to 5 years 6,000 out of 6,500 patients with mostly advanced cancer were still alive. That is over 90%, almost a reversal of the results to be expected after conventional treatment of advanced conditions”.

        I suggest this elitist priesthood are engaged in medical genocide – though down the ranks there are believers fighting the cause unaware the result of their good intentions.

        Look at the quactery of iatrogenic disease and death – and that of denied causations such as autism, alzheimers. The misery is unimaginable – but such is the power of a belief asserted and defended in place of true.

  5. Either way, with the measles vaccine we are injecting what the vaccine companies admit is a live virus into the human body. We are injecting a live virus which replicates. The virus is “watered down” a little bit but not much. It has been watered down to replicate slower but not to replicate less in the human brain.

    Look up the two main complications of measles and then ask yourself, how wise is this? How wise is it to inject a live virus into millions, perhaps billions of individuals where the live virus is known to has these complications.

    • Since there is no proof that any virus exists (not just the measles one), love or otherwise, it cannot possibly replicate.

      The ‘virus’ is the poison generated by illness. Injecting this poison, together with tons of toxins (adjuvants, heavy metals, foreign DNA from both human fetuses and animals, etc.) causes will cause nerve damage, brain damage, and much more.

      And no, it isn’t wise. It wouldn’t be IF vaccines actually worked to prevent illness, but is even more stupid, knowing that not a single vaccine in all of history has been proven to either be safe or effective. None work, and all do harm.

  6. If the measles virus does not exist, then what is what we know as the measles virus? Obviously, something causes the diseased we see as measles. The skin rash with spots all over is very consistent with what we know about other viruses. So is it a bacteria. Is it a mycobacteria?

    The classification is just a name. The viruses that we know about are so small you cannot see them with a microscope, you must use an electron microscope to see them.

    Measles does have some serious complications and it is very good that we have vaccines that prevent measles and these complications. Whatever you want to call it “virus”, “bacteria”, “infectious agent”, the vaccine works so that is what is most important.

    • If it is NOT a virus you troglodyte, then there cannot be a vaccine! You FOOL! You are simply going on faith, against evidence. Whatever they’re injecting you with, has side effects and it also doesn;t seem to cause any actual measles cases. Odd that. Failed vaccines can cause the disease they are meant to control. You are being HAD you idiot.

    • Actually, the vaccine does NOT work. Which is why, when you have any measles outbreak, the majority of people who get the measles have usually been vaccinated. In some cases, 100% have been fully vaccinated!

      People die of measles if they’re deficient in vitamin A. Which is why kids in third world countries die of measles. It would be wiser to give them food, clean water and vitamins, than giving them vaccines.

  7. the vaccine does NOT do what it is claimed to do ie prevent measles
    and
    now it appears that since measles is not identifiable as a virus how exactly is the vaccine that allegedly is effective only at eradicating “measles virus” supposed to work ?

    not to mention what about the collateral damage to the victims of the alleged vaccine who have REAL complications that are CONCLUSIVELY linked to vaccine usage ?

  8. It certainly can be a vaccine if it is not a virus. There are many vaccines against bacteria. The Diptheria vaccine is one of them. The pneumococcus vaccine protects against many strains of streptococcus. As yes you can actually see this bacteria under a microscope.

    What I am saying is that the disease is caused by an “infectious agent”. The name does not matter in some respects. They key point is you take this “infectious agent” grow it in a broth of sorts, water it down, package it into a “vaccine” and inject it into humans. It has neither been heated to kill the infectious nature nor has it been irradiated with ultraviolet light. So it is sill “infectious”. Some people would refer to this as “alive”.

    What happens when a rabid dog bits a human? Only if the bite goes into the muscle does it become a problem. Why? If the dog only bites the fatty tissue the human does not get rabies. Why is that?

  9. Well, perhaps someone should address the elephant in the room here that this presents. If measles is not a virus, but is an affliction people have gotten then, what is it? bacteria, bioweapons testing, chemical poisoning, a result of deficiencies in the human body resulting in a problem that is like, say, scurvy (no virus, merely the lack of vitamin C) , or rickets, (lack of sunlight/D-3) etc.?

    • As with any named disease or sickness, it is defined by a set of symptoms. Symptoms are the body’s way of alerting us to less than optimal functioning. We classify, categorize, name and define groups of symptoms for purposes of playing the money game. Who isn’t interested in buying into a quick fix when feeling miserable? Better yet, if it is marketed as a prevention, isn’t that particularly appealing? It’s all about the marketing. 😉

  10. The damn is breaking and Big Pharma are running out of fingers to plug it.

    How many Doctors (let alone laypeople) know that Pasteur recanted on his deathbed?

    “One of the most interesting twists in this battle for “disease prevention supremacy” primarily headlined by Pasteur and Bernard, is that Pasteur recanted on his deathbed over his entire life work, stating that “the microbe is nothing; the milieu is everything.” Another way of stating these words is that it is not the germ that causes disease, but the terrain in which the germ is found.

    Another gentleman, Rudolf Virchow, father of the germ theory, stated in his later years, “If I could live my life over again, I would devote it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat–diseased tissues–rather than causing disease.” ”
    http://blogs.naturalnews.com/germ-vs-terrain-theory-adopt-healthy/

  11. I read alot of contradicting replies on this article. It would be a good idea for this site to research this further and publish some follow ups. It would be very interesting if there actually is no Measles virus.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here