Home Blog Page 2145

Mentally Disabled Man Fatally Shot 46 Times by Cops

14

Written by: NiRA

 

Another instance of a gunshot by police had been taped on camera. Milton Hall, a homeless man aged 46 years and was mentally ill was recorded being gunned down by eight Saginaw, Michigan police officers in a video released this week by ACLU.

This event occurred in July of 2012, from the video we see a strong confrontation between the two parties (Milton and the police officers containing a K-9 police unit). Milton was reportedly having a verbal dispute with one of the employees of a local store when police arrived; Milton was armed at that time as he was holding a pen knife when he was brutally murdered.

So, what does the video shows us? In the video we can clearly see an old man fenced by cops and violently disturbed by the police dog in a Saginaw parking lot. This continued for some time and taking their steps nervously the eight officers decided to shoot and fired 46 hard bullets. However only 14 of those bullets hit Milton’s body, but they were enough to kill him. From the video which recorded the brutal series of gunshots to Milton, clearly shows that he was not causing any threat for the officers at that moment but the officers had their suspect outnumbered and pinned back at the exact time of the fighting squad style murder.

After being hit by 14 bullets Milton was lying unconscious, one of the eight officers decided and took the responsibility to turn the dying man, handcuff him and then stick his foot into his back.

After some investigation on this incident the U.S. Justice Department found all eight officers involved in it as innocent and didn’t did anything wrong to Milton. Earlier this year, in February the DOJ published joint statement with the U.S Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Michigan and the FBI, it stated:-

After a thorough investigation, federal authorities have determined that this tragic event does not present sufficient evidence of wilful misconduct to lead to a federal criminal prosecution of the police officers involved.

 

Jewel Hall, mother of Late Milton Hall, had a talk with the ACLU of Michigan related to the murder of her son in which she stated:-

When you have the U.S. government go in and look at Milton’s case for four or five months and then come out and say, “Well, it wasn’t intentional.” To shoot at somebody 46 times and it wasn’t intentional? It has given me a commitment for the little time that I have left to work with parents whose kids have been similarly killed.

What needs to change is how police deal with situations like the one that ended in my son’s death. The elected leaders and community leaders must address conditions that allow police to use excessive and deadly force with impunity.

 

Mrs Hall now dedicates her life to helping and assisting families whose loved ones have been murdered by law enforcement.

You can see a brief interview with Mrs Hall and the graphic police shooting for yourself below.

You can watch the video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Iigvm5iPkU

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

A Brand of Revolution

55

Written by: Anon DiVinci

 

When you hear the name Russell Brand, undoubtedly many different things comes to mind.  Some know him as an actor and some know him as a comedian.   Russell Brand is a man of many masks.  However, unless you follow him, you may not know him as “Russell Brand -The activist.”  Those who do follow Brand however, know that the actor/comedian is making waves with his statements and beliefs, that some call controversial.

 

Brand and his stance on government became the topic of headlines when he was interviewed in 2013 by Jeremy Paxman on the BBC’s hit Newsnight, after acquiring a role as guest editor of the New Statesmen’s revolution-themed issue.  What started as an engaging conversation/interview, quickly became a heated debate when Paxma asked Brand, “Why would anyone listen to a man who has never voted in his life?”  Anyone watching undoubtedly saw a shift in the conversation as Brand replied, “I don’t get my authority from this pre-existing paradigm, which is quite narrow and only serves a few people.  I look elsewhere for alternatives that might serve humanity.”

 

Within that 2013 interview, Brand called for revolution, stating, “If we can change things, why wouldn’t we?  Why is that naïve?  Why is that not my right, because I’m an actor?  I’ve taken the right.  I don’t need the right from you.  I don’t need the right from anybody.  I’m taking it.”  News of this call to action made headlines all over the world, and went viral on social media.

 

Following Brand’s book Revolution, Brand strikes again.  One of the topics of his new book that has garnered him a lot of criticism is his stance on the September 11th attacks.  When asked in a recent interview whether he believes the official story of the attacks, he says “What I think is interesting is the relationship that the Bin Laden family have had for a long time with the Bush family.  Do YOU trust the American government?”

 

Brand’s book Revolution has also been widely attacked due to the fury it has caused over Brand’s stance that it is pointless to vote, stating “I don’t vote as I believe democracy is a pointless spectacle where we choose between two indistinguishable political parties, neither of whom represent the people but the interest of powerful business elites that run the world.”

 

In response to Brand’s distaste for the democratic process of voting, Toni Pearce of the New Statesmen says  “If you don’t vote, you don’t matter.”  He goes on to say “If you don’t vote, the government will ignore your job, ignore your education and ignore your family.

 

Brand holds steadfast to his call to arms stating that “If we want to make a difference, then we have to be different.”  His hopes are that not only his stance but his book, brings a lot of issues to light that are often overlooked and ignored.  He feels that his status as a known actor can help bring this message to a much larger audience.

 

What do you think?  Do you agree with Russell Brand?  Do you agree that voting is pointless?  Do you agree that it’s time for a change and a revolution?  Let us know what you think in the comments.

______________________________________________________________

Sources:

 

First Water-ONLY Powered Generator You Can Buy

56

Written by: Tiobe

 

A Toronto, Canada company, GDS Technologies Ltd., says it has developed a portable generator that runs solely on tap water.

The GDS portable water generator comes in three models: 5,000 watts, 10,000 watts and 15,000 watts. According to inventor Gregory Potter, the 5,000-watt model can run for three days on four gallons.

A video demonstrates the 5,000-watt portable water generator in action; there is no pollution or exhaust, no hidden extension cords powering the device, no batteries to replace, it is significantly less noisy than a standard generator and the only upkeep is keeping the water tank clean and supplied with fresh tap water.

Features of the portable water generator include “rugged,” non-inflatable (or deflatable) tires, an emergency shut-off button, digital meters, a timer, covered outlets, a breaker and an optional intake valve that connects to a garden hose with automatic shut-off with a floating device within the water tank.

According to Potter, the 10,000-watt model can power two air conditioning units, but even the 5,000-watt model is suitable for running a stove, or computers and other electronics.

Models run from $5,360 Canadian to $14,885 Canadian, and will be available to the public “soon.” According to the company’s Alibaba site, GDS Technologies is currently capable of producing 400 portable water generators per month.

___________________________________________________________________

Sources:

http://www.gdstechnologies.ca/index.html

http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Portable-water-generator-runs-on-water-_50002273662.html

 

 

Apple Patent To Block iPhone Users From Filming At ‘Sensitive Events’

28

Written by: Tiobe

 

Apple Inc. has patented a technology that would allow the user – businesses, governments or law enforcement officers – remotely disable features of wireless devices, such as taking or sending photographs or video footage.

The patented technology utilizes WiFi, mobile base stations or GPS to send an encoded signal to all wireless devices within a so-called sensitive area, disabling recording functions. The patent lists potential “sensitive areas” as theaters, concert venues or religious ceremonies, but proponents of free speech worry this technology could be used by police who do not wish to be filmed in acts of brutality, for example.

“As wireless devices such as cellular telephones, pagers, personal media devices and smartphones become ubiquitous, more and more people are carrying these devices in various social and professional settings. The result is that these wireless devices can often annoy, frustrate, and even threaten people in sensitive venues,” states the patent. “Additionally, the wireless transmission of sensitive information to a remote source is one example of a threat to security. This sensitive information could be anything from classified government information to questions or answers to an examination administered in an academic setting.”

To be clear, Apple has patented the technology, but it would remain up to businesses and government agencies how and when it would be used.

Links: Protect your PC and mobile devices from hackers & governments and surf anonymously 

____________________________________________________________________________

Sources:

http://rt.com/news/apple-patent-transmission-block-408/

http://guardianlv.com/2013/08/apple-to-block-phone-features-at-sensitive-events/

 

Mexico Students Burn Down Government Buildings In Protest Over Police Corruption

10

Written by: Tiobe

 

Students and teachers from Ayotzinapa teachers college in Mexico set fire to the Municipal Palace in Chilpancingo Oct. 13 to protest police corruption and the Sept. 26 disappearance of 43 students.

The missing students were protesting new education legislation in Iguala when local police, working with local gangsters and drug cartel Guerreros Unidos, attacked them. The police chief and mayor of Iguala, Jose Luis Albarca, are under investigation in connection to the incident, but have since gone into hiding.

A mass grave was discovered Saturday, Oct. 4 containing the charred remains of approximately 20 unidentified persons. A forensic investigation of the remains is underway, though Mexico City federal prosecutors warn it can take weeks or months to identify the burnt corpses.

“I have confidence that we’ll find [the students] alive,” state governor Ángel Aguirre told reporters. Aguirre maintains the mass grave contains other, separate victims “of organized crime,” not the missing students.

For those waiting to know the fate of friends and loved ones, Aguirre’s comments just underscored the realities of a corrupt and ineffectual government: if the missing students are still alive, why have they not yet been found and returned safely home?

So Monday, Oct. 13, a crowd of around 200 individuals stormed the state capitol. After a standoff with police in riot gear, the protestors allowed police to evacuate children, women and seniors from the office building. Police also escorted men out before protestors began torching the Municipal Palace and some surrounding vehicles.

United States officials have issued warnings for travelers to avoid the northwestern part of the state of Guerrero, due to these and other violent incidents.

_________________________________________________________________________

Sources:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/protesters-burn-mexican-citys-government-offices-over-suspected-murder-of-students/2014/10/13/ddfa3392-5346-11e4-ba4b-f6333e2c0453_story.html

http://rt.com/news/195788-mexico-students-teachers-protest-burn/