Home Blog Page 3

Don’t believe everything you read on the internet

0

This image is flawed in at least five ways.

Can you find all of them?

The internet can be both a blessing and a curse when it comes to spreading ideas.

While it enables knowledge to be exchanged across borders, to billions of people, and at the speed of light, the question of trustworthiness arises.

There are thousands of people online who take great care in only showcasing information which has evidence to back it up. For example, the army of fact-checkers who keep Wikipedia accurate, hard-working journalists or scientific journals which are no longer limited by access to university libraries or subscriptions.

This is why you will always see my link directly to my sources when I write my articles about innovation and creativity. Evidence is of the upmost importance for you to trust what I write.

But unfortunately it is just as easy for anyone to make any claim they want, without any evidence to back it up. In some cases, lies and inaccurate information actually can be more appealing for certain people because it causes an emotional reaction rather than a rational one, allowing fake information to spread as it is shared between people

And as a result, misinformation like anti-vaccine rumours can spread quickly over the internet.

Especially if it is designed in a “share-first, think later” format like the image above.

So when you come across new ideas online, ask yourself three things:

  1. Does this information have a credible source?
  2. How does that source compare to other evidence from the scientific or journalistic community?
  3. Who would benefit from sharing misinformation?

Stay safe online.

Why Are Millions Of Men Admiring This Sex-Trafficking Accused Misogynist? His Fans speak out

0
Andrew Tate fans protest his arrest in Athens leaving netizens appalled (Image via Wikimedia Commons, Twitter/@GeorgeAvg1)

Last year, the most googled “who is” question in America was “Who is Andrew Tate?” Who you ask determines the answer. To his millions of young fans, he is a symbol of manhood, success, and wealth. However, many of his detractors see him as a dangerous social media influencer who could radicalize young men into committing violence against women. Tate has described himself as a “trillionaire” and a “misogynist”.

You may have never heard of Tate, but he is almost universally known among teenagers. In just a few months, he’s become one of the internet’s most divisive and provocative figures. He went viral in the summer of 2022, and despite TikTok removing his account due to “a hateful ideology,” #AndrewTate is still going strong.

Andrew Tate’s young fans and supporters have been protesting his arrest in Athens, Greece, despite the fact that the former kickboxer is being investigated for allegations of human trafficking. On Sunday, January 15, 2023, throngs of teenagers gathered on Ermou Street, the capital city’s pedestrian shopping district, chanting “Free Top G,” a reference to Tate.

Andrew Tate and his brother, Tristan Tate, were detained by Romanian authorities on December 29, 2022, and their assets were seized. The Athens protest was organized in response to a tweet from Tate’s Twitter handle, @Cobratate, which stated:

“Anyone who thinks I’m a human trafficker is a complete moron.”

“How far have we fallen”: Netizens criticize protesters for backing Andrew Tate
Infuriated internet users took to social media after hearing that Andrew Tate’s supporters were calling for his release.

Several people described the protest as “disgusting,” and they chastised the former kickboxer for his “bigoted” actions. Many people questioned how these young men could blindly follow online celebrities. Others noted that the protestors were unaware that Tate didn’t care about them.

Twitterati also claimed that these young followers, like their idol, could grow up to be misogynists and criminals. One Twitter user, @WIo oWI, made a sarcastic reference to the sentiment, writing:

A comment calling out the protestors (Image via Twitter/@Wlo_oWI)

Here are some more comments on Twitter criticizing the young protestors:

A comment calling out the protestors (Image via Twitter/@Laurieluvsmolly)
A comment calling out the protestors (Image via Twitter/@VictoriRaeW)
A comment calling out the protestors (Image via Twitter/@VictoriRaeW)
A comment calling out the protestors (Image via Twitter/@JohnTheodoridi8)
A comment calling out the protestors (Image via Twitter/@JohnTheodoridi8)
A comment calling out the protestors (Image via Twitter/@JohnTheodoridi8)
A comment calling out the protestors (Image via Twitter/@MaggieTziamou)

What happened to Andrew Tate?

Tate is a British-American social media personality known for promoting an alpha masculine and luxurious lifestyle and values. He has frequently faced backlash for his hate speech and misogynistic comments in interviews and on social media.

However, he has recently garnered a lot of followers among young men, who worship his ideals.

In December 2022, Tate, his brother, and two others were arrested on charges of r*pe, human trafficking, and organized crime. Following their detention, Romanian authorities raided their properties and found six women being held and exploited. They also found stacks of cash and several weapons. In light of the discovery, Romanian courts extended their detention by 30 days.

On January 4, 2023, a report by Spy News claimed that authorities also seized the socialite’s properties along with several of his cars. Less than a week later, it was reported that Andrew Tate was hospitalized after it was discovered that he developed lung nodules during a regular check-up.

As the case proceeds, authorities have two weeks to produce evidence against the Tate brothers to convince the courts, or apply to extend their detention while the investigation continues.

 

New AI Portrait App Can ‘Undress’ People Without Their Consent

0

Almost anyone who has been online in the last few days has probably noticed a sudden increase in the number of people uploading anime-style self-portraits.

Their creator, a photo-editing tool called Lensa AI, has dubbed them “Magic Avatars,” and they’ve taken over social media. Their popularity has grown in lockstep with ChatGPT, OpenAI’s next-generation Artificial Intelligence program chat-bot.

This Horrifying App Undresses a Photo of Any Woman With a Single Click

AI programs have had a banner year. With another called Midjourney taking the internet by storm, digital designers all over the world are worried they’ll be out of work soon. Text-to-image generators, the most visible of which are OpenAI’s DALL-E and Midjourney’s Stable Diffusion, have caused havoc in the creative industry.

Undressing anyone with a single click.

According to Futurism, a recording company presented an artificially intelligent rapper, but they quickly dismantled it. According to Futurism, machine learning was even used to generate full-fledged conversations with both living and deceased celebrities.

You could say AI has made significant strides recently, and let us not forget the Google engineer who was recently suspended after going public with his belief that they had created a sentient chat bot called LaMDA.

For years, experts have been working on the underlying technology, but recent advances, combined with significant financial investment, have sparked a mad dash to market. This has resulted in an explosion of consumer goods that incorporate cutting-edge technologies.

 

The only problem is that neither the goods nor the customers are ready.

For example, consider those “Magic Avatars” who appear harmless at first glance. After all, there’s nothing wrong with letting the software turn you into a vibrant avatar. In contrast to text-to-image converters, you are limited to the images you currently own.

Artists began raising concerns as soon as the “avatars” went viral, claiming that Lensa had no safeguards in place to protect the artists whose work may have been used to train the computer. On the negative side, despite Lensa’s “zero nakedness” usage policy, users found it surprisingly easy to take nude photos of themselves and anyone else they had photos of.

“The ease with which you can create images of anyone you can imagine (or, at the very least, anyone you have a handful of photos of) is terrifying,” writes Techcrunch’s Haje Jan Kamps.

Kamps tested the app’s pornographic creation capabilities by presenting it with poorly altered photographs of celebrity faces superimposed on naked people. Unfortunately for him, the manipulated photographs easily evaded all of the app’s ostensibly protective features.

“Add NSFW content into the mix, and we’re quickly careening into some pretty murky territory: your friends or some random person you met in a bar and exchanged Facebook friend status with may not have consented to someone generating soft-core porn of them,” he said.

That’s terrible, but it gets much worse. Despite Lensa’s claims that it prevents users from making child pornography, journalist Olivia Snow discovered this horrifying possibility after uploading photos of herself as a child to the app’s “Magic Avatars” feature. “I pieced together the required 10 photos to run the app and waited to see how it transformed me from awkward six-year-old to fairy princess,” she wrote in Wired. “The outcomes were horrifying.”

“The end result was fully-nude photos of an adolescent and sometimes childlike face but a distinctly adult body,” she explained. “This set elicited a certain coyness: a bare back, tousled hair, and an avatar with my childlike face holding a leaf between her naked adult breasts.”

The stories told by Kamps and Snow both highlight a frustrating aspect of today’s AI technology: it frequently behaves in ways that its designers did not anticipate, and it can even circumvent the safeguards put in place to prevent this. It suggests that the AI industry is moving faster than society and even their own technology can keep up with. This is extremely concerning, particularly in light of the findings.

Lensa told Techcrunch that users are solely responsible for any sexual content found in the app. Many people in business believe that bad actors will always exist and will continue to be terrible actors. Another common argument is that a skilled Photoshop user could create anything produced by such applications just as easily. They claim that any explicit or pornographic images are the “result of deliberate misconduct on the app.”

Both of these points of view have some validity. However, none of this changes the fact that Lensa’s software, like many others of its kind, makes it much easier for evil actors to accomplish what they could otherwise do. For the first time, anyone with access to the right algorithm can produce convincing fake nudity or high-quality renderings of child sexual abuse material.

The metaphor of Pandora’s box opening is also apparent. The Lensas of the world can try all they want to patent their technology, but copycat algorithms that circumvent the safeguards will still be developed. It will occur. It is a foregone conclusion.

Since Lensa’s debacle, there has been a growing awareness of the potential for actual people to suffer real and severe harm as a result of the premature adoption of AI technologies, such as image generators. Meanwhile, the sector appears to be adopting a full-throttle approach, with a focus on outpacing competitors for venture capital investment rather than ensuring the tools are adequately secure.

Keep in mind that nonconsensual porn is just one of many potential hazards in this situation. Another major source of concern is the ease with which political disinformation can be spread. What about automatic text creation software? Teachers are terrified at the prospect of this happening.

While AI may make our lives easier, it will undoubtedly cause many problems in the future. Where does it end when soon it will be entirely possible to fake an entire speech from a politician?

While it is likely that we will be able to bring dead actors back to life for the big screen, will you be able to trust anything digitally that you see without it being directly in front of you? My guess is that it does not.

Even a seemingly innocuous tool like “Magic Avatars” serves as a reminder that AI is still an experiment, even as it profoundly alters our reality, and that collateral damage is not a foreseen risk. This is undeniably true.

Buckle up, people.

Netflix To Officially End Password Sharing In 2023

0

We’ve all seen the Netflix memes about the number of paid user accounts versus actual users. The figures will astound you. 100 million viewers sit back and watch their favorite shows for free on the streaming service. Assume you include the lost sales revenue in this calculation. In that case, you can see why the service provider decided to limit password sharing and hold viewers accountable.

The company experienced a massive surge at the start of COVID-19, when millions of users were forced to quarantine themselves at home. This, however, did not last. As users returned to work in 2022, earnings were shaken. Shareholders saw massive drops in subscriptions, and as one might expect, plans had to be made.

After all, it’s just business, and sharing passwords makes no financial sense.
The Netflix team is obviously treading carefully with this entire rollout, as they risk massive backlash from both viewers and subscribers. At a company gathering, co-CEO Reed Hastings told senior executives that password sharing had been allowed for far too long. He also claimed that the pandemic had only obscured the true scope of the problem.

What does this mean for the 100 million people who already benefit from password sharing? If they do not sign up, they risk losing access to their favorite shows. Netflix took a risky but necessary step to ensure the continuity of the service we’ve come to expect. The exact policy and how it will be implemented are unknown at this time, but it appears that the company has a few ideas in mind.

Monitoring your IP address to avoid password sharing

One possible method of crackdown is to track IP addresses and then disable password sharing from there. They will offer those subscribers the option of paying an additional fee to share their password. They tried it in South America, charging an extra $3 to $4 per month for a second ‘home address,’ but abandoned the idea. When logging in, there was talk of validation codes and the ability to add a second user.

“Love is sharing a password”

The company tweeted in 2017 that “love is sharing a password.” They are now aware that consumers may not take the decision to change lightly. “Make no mistake, I don’t think consumers will love it right away,” Co-CEO Ted Sarandos said this month during a meeting with investors. He also emphasized the importance of the company, stating that Netflix as a brand must demonstrate the value of the move to users.

There are packages for everyone.

In order to provide more flexibility, Netflix has also made an ad-supported version/package available to users. Many people who may not have wanted to subscribe at a higher price may find the reduced subscription of $6.99 appealing. When compared to competitors like Hulu, which offers a similar option for $7.99 per month, the deal appears to be a steal. This strategy so far doesn’t seem like much of a saving grace, as the regular subscription fee is still a much more popular choice.

So if we want to keep watching shows like Stranger Things and Wednesday, we’ll have to toughen up. After all, good shows cost money to produce, so it’s only fair that Netflix asks for our help where it counts. With a low monthly fee, we can have constant access to high-quality content.

The Woman Who Hunted 10 Cartel Members That Kidnapped Her Daughter

0

Miriam Rodriguez discovered her daughter’s scarf while digging through the dirt at an abandoned ranch outside of San Fernando, Tamaulipas, Mexico.

It was a heartbreaking discovery that would later lead to the discovery of a portion of Karen’s femur among the dozens of bodies buried in the area.

Miriam, on the other hand, would not be deterred from her mission; she would find the people who kidnapped and murdered her daughter.

San Fernando was still reeling from the 2011 massacre in 2014. Los Zetas, a wing of the Gulf Cartel, had murdered nearly 200 people a few years before. The majority of those discovered in mass graves around the area were kidnap victims from bus hijackings. Many had been kidnapped to fund the cartel war, and thousands had fled the area in fear of being another target.

Karen’s brother, Luis, had already left to avoid the dangers of San Fernando, but Karen was only 20. She wished to complete her education and assist her mother at Rodeo Boots, a cowboy store.

Karen was driving when two cars surrounded her. Men armed with guns dragged her from her car and into theirs, kidnapping her. They took her to the Rodriguez family’s house and bound her up, ready to carry out their ransom plan. Instead, a family member stopped by to work on a car, startling the kidnappers.

They took both captives and fled the house.

The ransom money was borrowed from the bank by Miriam and her husband. The area had seen so many kidnappings that the bank specifically offered loans for ransom payments.

Miriam and her family did exactly what the gang ordered. They left the ransom money near the health clinic, as instructed, and went to a nearby cemetery to await further instructions. They were never approached.

Miriam requested a meeting with Los Zetas, and they agreed to meet at El Junior, a local restaurant. She begged the man who arrived to release her daughter, but he told Miriam that they didn’t have Karen. He did, however, offer to assist Miriam in locating her for a fee. Miriam assumed this man’s name was Sama based on the constant voices coming from the cheap plastic radio attached to his belt.

Miriam’s calls went unanswered after she paid the gang $2,000 in cash. However, the kidnappers did eventually call her, asking for $500 more.

Karen’s family waited for her return, never giving up hope. Until one day, Miriam, who was now divorced and living with her older daughter Azalea, declared that she knew Karen wasn’t coming home. She also told her daughter that she would not stop looking for the people who had kidnapped her. She began with Sama.

Capturing the mice

The family friend who was kidnapped with Karen was quickly released. He wasn’t worth anything to the gang, but his memories of the men who kidnapped him were priceless to a desperate mother.

Miriam prodded him for information, which confirmed Sama’s involvement in Karen’s kidnapping. She then began scouring social media for the face of the man who sat across from her in the restaurant and claimed not to have taken her child.

She discovered Sama on Facebook. He was photographed standing next to a woman dressed in an ice cream shop uniform. The store was located two hours away in Ciudad, Victoria.

Miriam had been waiting outside the store for Sama to appear to meet his partner for weeks. Miriam followed them back to their house when he finally arrived.

She changed her appearance and put on the uniform she wore when she worked for the Health Ministry many years ago. She spent the next day knocking on Sama’s neighbors’ doors, inviting them to take part in a community survey.

She didn’t want to kill him, but she did want justice. Her mission was to gather as much information about the man as possible to present to the authorities. Then, with the friend’s memory of his kidnapping and her information on Sama, they’d be able to apprehend him.

Miriam began visiting local authorities to share her information with them after she had exhausted the well. Miriam’s problem was that over 70,000 people had gone missing in Mexico, and the country’s homicide rate had more than doubled; no one cared.

She eventually found one federal officer willing to assist her.

“She had gone to every level of government, and they had all shut the door in her face. So it was the greatest honor of my career to assist her in tracking down the people who kidnapped her daughter.”

A warrant for Sama’s arrest was issued, but he had already vanished.

Miriam’s son was the one who eventually tracked down Sama. Luis was closing up his store in Ciudad Victoria when he noticed the man in so many photographs. On Mexican Independence Day, Sama was apprehended and began giving police the names of the others involved in Karen’s abduction.

The youngster

Zapata Gonzalez, 18, was apprehended based on this new information. Miriam was taken aback by the boy’s youth, and her compassion helped her elicit additional information from him, including the location of her daughter.

The ranch was no longer a residence, and the house was riddled with bullet holes. A noose was also hung from an old tree. Miriam discovered dozens of bodies scattered around the property after discovering Karen’s scarf. Miriam demanded a second investigation, which resulted in the identification of a portion of Karen’s femur.

The childminder

Miriam and Azalea had recently eaten at a restaurant near the abandoned ranch, and she remembered talking to Elvia Yuliza while they ordered. Miriam had known Elvia for years and had found it strange how elusive she’d been at the time, but now she wondered if she knew what had happened to Karen.

A quick search revealed that Elvia had been in a relationship with one of the kidnappers who was already imprisoned and untouchable by Miriam. Miriam waited for Elvia to make a mistake, and she did. Elvia’s home had been the source of the kidnapping calls, and she was quickly apprehended.

The regenerate Christian

Miriam had a few hints that pointed to Enrique Flores, so she went to see his grandmother to see if she could get any information about her grandson from her. Miriam attended the mass to observe Flores more closely after learning that he had begun attending church.

Miriam reported her findings to the police and handed over her research on the man. To the horror of his family, he was arrested inside the church.

The floral designer

Miriam had tracked down the florist, who was selling flowers on the Texas bridge. She’d been looking for him for over a year, and she’d been given a tip about where to look.

Miriam, 56, had been looking for her daughter’s killers for several years at this point. She’d founded the Colectivo de Desaparecidos de San Fernando (The Vanished Collective), a support group for parents of kidnapped children that had quickly grown to 600 members.

She received numerous death threats from gangs and family members of those she’d assisted in putting away, but it didn’t stop her.

He recognized her and ran the day she found the florist. She caught up with him and held him at gunpoint for an hour while police arrived.

Miriam spent three years tracking down almost all of the living gang members who kidnapped and murdered her daughter. She discovered a total of ten.

She dyed and cut her hair, got fake IDs, changed her clothes, and pretended to be health workers and election officials to get close to the gang’s family members. She talked to grandmothers, neighbors, cousins, and bosses. They gave her snippets of information that helped her piece together a story about the men she was looking for.

Her investigation gained her fame in Mexico, and with it, exposure. She was a woman in her fifties who was fighting a notorious gang. She was bringing transparency to their crimes and demonstrating to other families with missing children that they should be fighting back, not hiding in the shadows and hoping their children would be found alive.

Her mission exposed her, making her vulnerable. People did not go after the cartels, and she eventually requested armed guards from the Mexican government to protect her.

She was on the trail of murderers who had disguised themselves as upstanding members of the community, and they would do anything to keep their identities hidden.

On Mother’s Day in 2017, Miriam was shot dead outside her home. She’d just handed over another gang member to police a few weeks before. Finally, she was one step closer to apprehending all of her daughter’s assailants.

Some of the men Miriam had imprisoned had escaped, and she was worried they’d come after her and her family. Despite the police’s protection, she was murdered.

For a while, San Fernando fell silent. The community was in mourning over the death of their vigilante, and her death touched many people. Even the state’s governor, Francisco Javier Garca Cabeza de Vaca, tweeted about Miriam’s death.

“The Tamaulipas government will not allow Miriam Rodriguez’s death to become yet another statistic #NoToImpunity.”

Authorities vowed to find her killers, and a plaque was erected in her honor in town.

Keeping the cause alive

Luis, Miriam’s son, took over her support group, but it quickly faded as the members became fearful. Miriam’s murder had sent a strong message to them.

A month after Miriam’s death, police in Veracruz, 500 miles from San Fernando, arrested a woman. Miriam had given the tip because she suspected the woman of murdering her daughter. She had driven a taxi from San Fernando to Veracruz with her son. The woman had tortured Karen and beaten her as she hung from her wrists. Miriam Rodriguez had located another.

In Mexico, crime has increased dramatically since 2017. On June 7, 2020, 117 murders were reported in 24 hours.

Cartel gangs have even targeted public figures in high-profile attacks. Last year, one of the gangs disguised itself as a construction worker in order to gain access to the police chief, Omar Garca. He recovered from three gunshot wounds and blamed the attack on the Jalisco New Generation Cartel. They were also responsible for the deaths of 26 people at a drug rehabilitation center in Guanajuato.